Pentagon readies fifteen hundred troops to possibly deploy to MN, and it’s understandably causing a stir, isn’t it? The immediate reaction seems to be a mix of shock, concern, and a whole lot of questions about what this means for the country. It’s hard not to recall past predictions about the potential for the military to be used against American citizens, and the echoes of those warnings now feel particularly loud. The idea that troops might be deployed within the US, potentially to quell unrest, certainly challenges the conventional understanding of the military’s role.
Pentagon readies fifteen hundred troops to possibly deploy to MN, and the memories of past administrations, and the way the political landscape has shifted, come flooding back.… Continue reading
Reagan-Appointed judge says Trump admin ‘failed’ to protect Constitution is a pretty striking statement, isn’t it? It’s not just some random legal analyst, but a judge appointed by Ronald Reagan, a figure often held up as a conservative icon, who is saying the Trump administration didn’t just stumble, but actively disregarded the very foundation of American governance.
The judge, William G. Young, made this declaration in the context of a case regarding the First Amendment, specifically concerning free speech on college campuses. He was addressing the Trump administration’s policies, which he believed were violating this fundamental right. The core of his concern was the potential for retribution against academics who challenged the administration’s actions, like arrests, detentions, and deportations of pro-Palestinian activists.… Continue reading
Trump says federal payments to sanctuary cities to end from February 1st. This announcement is causing quite a stir, and it’s easy to see why. The core issue boils down to a fundamental question: if you’re paying your dues, but not receiving the services, what’s the point? Many feel this action is a blatant disregard for the Constitution, a document that’s supposed to safeguard against such overreach. The frustration is palpable, with many questioning the fairness and legality of withholding funds.
The implications are far-reaching. Some see this as a potential prelude to more drastic measures, even suggesting it could be a tactic to generate civil unrest, paving the way for more authoritarian actions.… Continue reading
In the 1980s, a visit to Neuschwanstein Castle sparked reflections on King Ludwig II and his withdrawal from reality, drawing parallels to a modern leader. The author raises concerns about Trump’s increasingly erratic behavior, drawing attention to his impulsive actions, like claiming to run Venezuela without any existing plan. This behavior, alongside other bizarre incidents, raises questions about his fitness for office, echoing historical precedents where leaders’ mental states threatened governance. The author urges for the importance of the constitution and those in power to uphold it.
Read More
Pope Leo calls for Venezuela to remain an independent country. It seems like the core message here is that the Pope wants Venezuela to retain its sovereignty. This isn’t about annexing the country or changing its borders; it’s about ensuring Venezuela remains in control of its own destiny. The Pope, in his statement, is emphasizing the importance of “overcoming violence and embarking on paths of justice and peace” while safeguarding Venezuela’s independence. This resonates with the idea of self-determination, which means the right of a people to choose their own form of government and control their own affairs without outside interference.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court is failing at its most important job: upholding the Constitution and ensuring justice. It’s becoming increasingly clear that the current court isn’t acting in good faith, and is veering towards a dangerous path that prioritizes partisan politics over the fundamental principles upon which this nation was built.
The justices appear to be flirting with an expansive view of executive power, potentially enabling an unaccountable White House. This approach undermines the crucial role the founders intended for Congress, as outlined in Article I of the Constitution. The court has seemed far more lenient towards claims of executive power under certain presidents, even when compared to the approach taken towards other administrations.… Continue reading
The three runaway nuns of Kloster Goldenstein have been offered a reprieve, allowing them to remain in their former convent “until further notice.” However, this offer is contingent upon them ceasing all social media activity, which has garnered them a significant following. Church officials also require that the enclosed convent grounds be restricted to members of the order. In exchange for these conditions, the nuns will receive medical care and spiritual support.
Read More
In a recent interview with NPR, Senator Mark Kelly criticized the Pentagon’s investigation into his involvement in a video reminding active-duty troops about the illegality of following unlawful orders. The former Navy fighter pilot is facing potential court-martial for appearing in the video, which was released amid legal concerns regarding the deployment of National Guard troops. Kelly also responded to the White House’s initial condemnation of the video, where the President stated this action was “seditious behavior, punishable by death.”
Read More
Following a video released by six Democratic members of Congress urging service members to refuse illegal orders, Donald Trump reacted with threats of sedition charges. This prompted an investigation into one of the lawmakers for “serious allegations of misconduct.” The Uniform Code of Military Justice mandates obedience to lawful orders but also imposes a duty to disobey those deemed unlawful, as supported by legal precedent and historical examples of service members refusing to participate in illegal wars. Expert testimony, citing the Nuremberg Charter, UN Charter, and UCMJ, has been used in court-martial cases to defend those who refused to comply with potentially unlawful orders.
Read More
In response to perceived intimidation, Kelly recounted his military and NASA service, highlighting his dedication to the country. He emphasized his commitment to his job and the Constitution, expressing that he would not be silenced by those prioritizing power. This comes amid illegal orders from the Trump administration, including a recent ruling against the deployment of the National Guard. Kelly’s statement directly challenges the administration’s actions and perceived threats.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker