The upcoming four years represent a pivotal moment for America. To ensure continued access to unbiased reporting during this critical period, HuffPost is introducing an ad-free experience for contributing supporters. This initiative aims to safeguard the future of free and impartial journalism. The opportunity to join this effort and support HuffPost’s fearless newsroom is now available.
This article revisits a 2018 claim suggesting Russian leverage over Donald Trump, potentially dating back to a 1987 Moscow trip. The author’s initial assessment of Russian influence was around 10-20%, now raised to over 50% based on Trump’s subsequent pro-Russia stances and confirmation from a former KGB spy. While the full extent of this influence remains unknown, the author now believes that even definitive proof would have had limited impact on public opinion or Trump’s political standing, mirroring the muted reaction to previously confirmed Russian kompromat. Ultimately, Trump’s inherent weaknesses and incompetence undermined any significant leverage Russia may have held.
In a recent NOAA briefing, researchers omitted any mention of the link between January’s record high global temperatures and human-caused greenhouse gas emissions, a departure from previous practices. This omission occurred despite the briefing acknowledging record-high temperatures and despite direct questions about the role of climate change. The head of NOAA’s monitoring branch cited factors such as reduced air pollution and cloud cover as potential explanations, but this explanation fails to account for the overall warming trend. This silence comes amidst increased scrutiny of US scientific agencies under the Trump administration and a broader effort to downplay the role of climate change in government reports and communications.
A Polish farmer is threatening legal action against Elon Musk’s SpaceX after rocket debris rained down on his property. The incident, which involved a SpaceX rocket disintegrating over northern Poland, caused damage to a warehouse, a pond, and a local road, in addition to scattering toxic debris across the land. This isn’t just a matter of inconvenience; it’s a significant disruption to the farmer’s livelihood, potentially affecting his ability to cultivate his land and impacting his income. The farmer is understandably upset and determined to seek compensation for the damage inflicted.
The sheer scale of the damage caused by the falling debris underscores the seriousness of the situation.… Continue reading
Hunter Schafer’s passport was recently reissued with a male gender marker despite her having consistently identified as female. This change, she believes, is a direct result of a Trump-era executive order restricting gender marker changes on passports to those aligning with assigned sex at birth. Schafer’s experience highlights the real-world impact of this policy on transgender individuals, regardless of their social standing. She shared her story to raise awareness of the growing challenges faced by the trans community and the subtle, yet significant, ways policies can affect their lives.
Actress Hunter Schafer revealed that her renewed passport incorrectly lists her sex as male, a direct consequence of a Trump-era executive order defining sex based solely on birth assignment. Despite selecting “female” on the application, Schafer’s passport reflects the order’s mandate, overriding her gender identity. This policy, which eliminates the “X” gender marker, has faced legal challenges and impacts countless transgender individuals. Schafer shared her experience not for personal sympathy, but to highlight the broader impact on the transgender community.
President Trump’s assertion that Ukrainian President Zelensky possesses a 4% approval rating is demonstrably false. Reputable polling data consistently shows Zelensky’s approval ratings significantly higher, frequently exceeding 50% and even reaching 90% at the war’s outset. Trump’s claim contradicts multiple recent surveys from organizations like the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. This inaccurate statement, made alongside Trump’s claim that Ukraine started the war, highlights a disconnect from established facts regarding the Ukrainian political landscape.
The Associated Press filed a lawsuit against three Trump administration officials, alleging unconstitutional suppression of speech after the White House restricted AP journalists’ access to presidential events. The restrictions, directly linked to the AP’s refusal to adopt Trump’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico, are viewed as a retaliatory measure against the news agency’s editorial independence. The lawsuit, citing the First Amendment, seeks to immediately restore the AP’s access and prevent future government interference with press freedom. The White House, however, maintains its position and anticipates a court battle.
As the third anniversary of Russia’s invasion approaches, Ukraine faces a new threat: waning U.S. support fueled by Donald Trump’s pro-Russia rhetoric and calls for a swift ceasefire favorable to Moscow. Despite initial concerns about internal divisions, Trump’s attacks on President Zelenskyy have paradoxically unified Ukrainians, even among political opponents. This comes as Ukrainian forces, exhausted and facing slow but steady Russian advances, remain committed to the fight despite potential cuts in funding and weaponry. The conflict highlights a dangerous alignment between Trump’s stance and Russia’s goals, potentially jeopardizing Ukraine’s sovereignty and undermining the efforts to achieve a just peace.
President Trump’s administration, spearheaded by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, aims to dismantle the IRS, shifting the tax burden onto external entities. This initiative, evidenced by planned IRS layoffs and a $20 billion budget cut, is actively underway despite ongoing tax season. Simultaneously, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency seeks access to all taxpayer data, further indicating a radical restructuring of the tax system. The feasibility of completely abolishing the IRS, however, remains uncertain due to potential legal challenges and congressional opposition.
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood