President Trump’s announcement of a 125% tariff increase on Chinese goods and a temporary 10% reduction for other nations has sparked widespread criticism. This action, predicted by some, follows Trump’s long-standing advocacy for protectionist trade policies, including proposals made during his 2024 campaign. Claims that this drastic tariff increase is unexpected are refuted by Trump’s consistent campaign rhetoric and previous actions. The current economic crisis is thus not a surprise, but rather a foreseeable consequence of Trump’s stated policy goals, intensified in his second term by decreased political constraints and heightened loyalty from within the Republican party.
Read More
Trump’s announcement of raising tariffs on Chinese goods to 125%, effective immediately, has sent shockwaves through the global economy. The abruptness of the decision, coupled with previous seemingly contradictory actions, points to a chaotic and potentially reckless approach to trade policy. The claim that this is simply a “buy the dip” opportunity for the wealthy rings true when considering the timing and the market’s immediate reaction. A 90-day pause on other tariffs, following a declaration that no such pause would occur, adds to the bewilderment and raises concerns about potential insider trading.
This impulsive move completely disregards the intricate complexities of international trade.… Continue reading
President Trump temporarily reduced tariffs on imports from most U.S. trade partners to 10% for 90 days, while simultaneously raising tariffs on Chinese imports to 125%. This action followed the imposition of reciprocal tariffs by nearly 90 nations and China’s subsequent tariff increase on U.S. goods to 84%. The announcement prompted a significant surge in the stock market, with the S&P 500 experiencing its largest single-day gain in five years. Trump cited concerns about overreaction from other countries as the impetus for the tariff reduction.
Read More
Democratic strategist James Carville voiced serious concerns about Donald Trump’s potential actions, warning of a genuine threat to the U.S. democratic process. Carville highlighted Trump’s disregard for laws and the Constitution, suggesting a willingness to employ undemocratic tactics, including potentially declaring martial law to subvert the 2026 election. He emphasized the escalating danger, urging high alert regarding Trump’s authoritarian tendencies and intentions to harm the country. Carville’s assessment underscores the gravity of the situation, painting a picture of a potential constitutional crisis.
Read More
Trump is being sued by a Democrat he removed from a US civil rights agency. This legal battle, unfolding against a backdrop of already intense political polarization, adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing discussions about power, accountability, and the very nature of political appointments.
The lawsuit itself is a direct consequence of Trump’s actions during his presidency. He wielded considerable power in appointing and removing officials, a power inherent in the executive branch. However, the legal challenge suggests that the manner in which he exercised this power in this specific case may have violated legal norms or exceeded permissible boundaries.… Continue reading
Secretary Kristi Noem’s recent X post, showcasing a law enforcement operation, drew immediate criticism for her unsafe handling of a firearm. The video shows Noem pointing the weapon directly at an officer’s head, prompting condemnation from Senator Ruben Gallego and others for exhibiting poor muzzle discipline and disregard for firearm safety protocols. Critics across the political spectrum denounced the photo op as unprofessional and inappropriate, with some highlighting the incident in the context of Noem’s past actions. The incident sparked a wider debate regarding the optics of such staged events.
Read More
While President Trump claims foreign leaders are desperately seeking deals and “kissing his ass,” a Politico report contradicts this, revealing that several countries, including the Philippines and the U.K., have been unable to reach the administration for discussions regarding tariffs. Despite these claims of unreturned communication, Press Secretary Leavitt insists that the administration is receiving numerous calls. This discrepancy highlights a significant communication breakdown between the Trump administration and other world leaders.
Read More
Trump’s recent announcement of a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs, excluding China, has sent shockwaves through global markets and sparked a firestorm of debate. The immediate market reaction was a dramatic surge, leading many to accuse the President of blatant market manipulation. The sheer speed and scale of the jump suggest insider knowledge may have played a significant role, allowing certain individuals to profit handsomely before the news became public.
The 90-day pause, while presented as a temporary reprieve, leaves many feeling uneasy. The uncertainty surrounding the future of these tariffs creates a climate of instability, hindering long-term economic planning and investment.… Continue reading
In response to new US tariffs on various imported goods, Canada has implemented reciprocal 25% tariffs on select US automobile imports and parts. These retaliatory measures, announced by Finance Minister Champagne, target vehicles and components non-compliant with the CUSMA agreement or containing non-Canadian/Mexican content. The action follows President Trump’s imposition of global tariffs and ongoing trade disputes with Canada. This tit-for-tat escalation comes amidst heightened tensions between the two North American neighbours.
Read More
UnitedHealth successfully blocked a shareholder proposal, twice, that would have mandated an analysis of the healthcare access impacts of the company’s practices, such as prior authorization. The proposal, spearheaded by the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, was withdrawn to preserve the possibility of resubmission next year. UnitedHealth utilized new SEC guidance to file a second challenge, preventing the proposal from reaching a shareholder vote. This action drew criticism for potentially disenfranchising investors and silencing concerns about material risks related to healthcare access and affordability.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood