President Trump issued executive orders imposing 25% tariffs on all goods from Mexico and Canada, and a 10% tariff on Canadian oil and Chinese imports, citing the opioid crisis and illegal immigration as justification. These tariffs, effective immediately, include a retaliation clause to escalate if trade partners retaliate with their own tariffs. The decision, made without prior negotiation, has drawn significant criticism for potentially sparking a trade war and raising consumer prices. Despite claims that tariffs stimulate success, economists warn of negative economic consequences for both the U.S. and its trading partners, including potential recessions in Mexico and increased costs of living in the US.
Read More
Mexico anticipates the potential imposition of 25% tariffs on its goods, viewing a trade war as avoidable and detrimental to both nations. While acknowledging the severity of the drug trafficking problem and the accusations levied by the White House, the Mexican government maintains a calm approach, emphasizing the harm tariffs would inflict on the U.S. economy. President Sheinbaum’s administration, recently inaugurated, has appointed a respected public security minister to address these concerns. Ultimately, Mexico hopes to engage in constructive dialogue with the U.S., despite the current tense atmosphere and the Trump administration’s aggressive tactics.
Read More
Donald Trump’s imposition of 25% tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods has sparked a potential trade war, with Canada vowing retaliation and Mexico preparing a measured response. China, also facing tariffs, has expressed opposition, highlighting the potential for global economic repercussions. While the US has threatened further tariffs against the European Union, a senior Trump advisor suggested a trade agreement with the UK is a priority, possibly due to a more balanced trade history. Concerns of global recession and inflation, voiced by the IMF and JP Morgan, have been dismissed by the Trump advisor.
Read More
Newly released Federal Election Commission filings reveal Elon Musk contributed over $290 million to the 2024 election, primarily supporting President Trump and the Republican party, securing significant influence within the new administration. Trump’s political committees also amassed millions, enabling continued political activity despite term limits. Meanwhile, key Senate incumbents in battleground states began stockpiling funds for the 2026 midterms, while the DNC spent heavily on post-election activities. Musk’s super PAC plans to continue its efforts in the 2026 cycle.
Read More
In response to President Trump’s 25% tariffs on Canadian goods, Canada plans to implement retaliatory tariffs focused on American products readily available from alternative sources, prioritizing consumer protection. This initial phase aims to pressure U.S. exporters and politicians to oppose the tariffs. Further escalation is possible, with a “stepwise” approach to expanding levies, potentially including energy and critical minerals, though this faces political challenges within Canada. Early indications suggest this strategy may already be impacting U.S. political figures, as evidenced by Senator Collins’ concerns about the effect on Maine.
Read More
President Trump imposed a 25% tariff on nearly all Canadian goods, along with a 10% tariff on energy products, citing concerns about fentanyl and migration. This unprecedented action, effective Tuesday, is predicted to severely impact Canada’s GDP and potentially trigger a recession. Canada plans retaliatory tariffs, with Prime Minister Trudeau expected to announce specific measures. The intertwined economies of Canada and the U.S. will face significant consequences, affecting businesses, workers, and consumers on both sides of the border.
Read More
Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, Trump’s former attorney, ordered the dismissal of numerous prosecutors and sought the termination or retirement of numerous FBI agents involved in the January 6th investigation. This action, justified by an executive order ending the “weaponization” of law enforcement, is viewed by Democrats as retaliatory and a dangerous assault on the rule of law. Critics, including several high-ranking Democrats, condemn the move as an authoritarian attempt to purge the DOJ and FBI of individuals loyal to the Constitution. The FBI Agents Association warned that such dismissals would severely weaken the Bureau’s capabilities.
Read More
President Trump’s numerous actions, including a federal spending freeze, a ban on birthright citizenship, and the dismissal of multiple inspectors general, have prompted accusations from legal scholars and historians of widespread violations of constitutional and federal law. These actions, characterized as a “blitzkrieg on the law,” involved circumventing established procedures and disregarding the authority of other branches of government. The unprecedented speed and scope of these actions have raised concerns about the erosion of the rule of law and the normalization of such behavior. Legal challenges to these executive orders have resulted in temporary injunctions, highlighting the significant legal and constitutional questions they raise.
Read More
President Trump plans to impose a 25% tariff on Canadian and Mexican goods, including oil, starting Saturday, despite lacking any apparent willingness to negotiate. This action is projected to severely impact the Canadian economy, potentially causing a GDP contraction comparable to the 2009 recession, alongside increased national debt. The move threatens to unravel decades of increasingly close economic ties between Canada and the U.S., dating back to 1935, fundamentally altering their relationship. Industries like the Canadian auto sector face potential shutdown due to the tariffs.
Read More
Allegations of voting irregularities in the 2024 election, favoring President Trump, are based on analyses of “drop-off” votes in swing states. Two election integrity groups, the Election Truth Alliance and SMART Elections, noted discrepancies between presidential and down-ballot votes, particularly a significant increase in Republican drop-off rates compared to historical data. These findings, while not definitively proving manipulation, warrant further review, according to these groups. President Trump’s comments regarding Elon Musk and Pennsylvania voting machines further fueled these concerns, although no formal investigations are currently underway.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker