US Election 2024

Trump Proposes Deporting US Citizens to El Salvador

Despite legal constraints, including the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment and the logistical challenges posed by U.S. Code 3621, Trump suggested expanding deportation beyond those who enter the country illegally. Deporting incarcerated U.S. citizens presents significant legal hurdles due to the need for court appearances and adherence to U.S. prison standards, which are not met in countries like El Salvador. The potential for human rights violations in countries like El Salvador further complicates such deportations.

Read More

Trump Threatens China With 50% Tariffs, Risks Economic Disaster

The US-China trade war, a long-feared scenario for tech companies, has intensified with escalating tariffs. Trump’s threat of additional 50% tariffs on Chinese goods follows China’s retaliatory measures, including tariffs and restrictions on rare earth metals. This tit-for-tat exchange leaves US tech firms facing increased costs and supply chain disruptions. China, however, displays confidence in its ability to withstand the economic pressure, citing past resilience in the face of US trade actions. The current standoff leaves the future of the trade relationship uncertain.

Read More

Trump Tariffs Trigger Stock Market Plunge: Orange Monday Panic

Major U.S. stock indexes experienced significant drops on Monday, with the S&P 500 briefly entering bear market territory, driven by uncertainty surrounding President Trump’s tariff policies. A short-lived market upswing followed unsubstantiated reports of a tariff pause, quickly dismissed by the White House. Despite a partial recovery, significant losses remain across all major indices, fueling social media commentary dubbing the event “Orange Monday” in reference to Trump’s perceived role in the market downturn. Critics largely attribute the market crash to Trump’s economic policies rather than natural market fluctuations.

Read More

Supreme Court Allows Trump to Expedite Deportations Under Alien Enemies Act

The Supreme Court temporarily allowed the Trump administration to utilize the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expedite the deportation of alleged gang members, overturning a lower court’s injunction. This decision permits the use of the wartime authority while ongoing legal challenges proceed, but mandates that affected migrants receive adequate notice and an opportunity to contest their removal. While three liberal justices dissented, and Justice Barrett partially dissented, the Court emphasized the need for due process in deportation proceedings under the Act. The ruling effectively sides with the Trump administration’s argument regarding judicial authority and the urgency of the situation.

Read More

Trump Voters Confront Economic Realities: Did He Screw Them Over?

Despite President Trump’s strong rural support, his tariffs have sparked a trade war devastating farmers, prompting calls for government bailouts to avert disaster. This economic hardship contrasts with the unwavering loyalty many farmers express towards the President. Significant Republican apprehension regarding the tariffs’ negative impact underscores a growing divide within the party. The situation highlights the complex nature of rural support for Trump and presents a strategic opportunity for Democrats.

Read More

Trump’s Kindergarten Economics: A Nation’s Economic Woes Exposed

Contrary to former President Trump’s assertions, a trade deficit does not represent an economic loss; it signifies that a nation imports more than it exports. Economists largely agree that trade deficits are not inherently negative, as a country cannot and should not produce all goods domestically. Trump’s focus on eliminating the U.S. trade deficit with China, particularly the $295.4 billion deficit in 2024, stemmed from a misunderstanding of basic economics and was driven by protectionist sentiments. His demands for China to resolve the surplus before tariff negotiations highlighted this flawed perspective.

Read More

GOP Bill Aims to Curb President’s Tariff Power

In response to President Trump’s new tariffs, a House Republican plans to introduce legislation limiting the White House’s ability to impose tariffs without Congressional approval. This bill, mirroring a bipartisan Senate proposal, would require the President to inform Congress within 48 hours of any new tariff, providing reasoning and impact analysis. Congress would then have 60 days to approve the tariff or it would expire. While facing challenges in the House, the bill has garnered initial support and could gain momentum depending on the economic impact of the new tariffs. The legislation underscores the constitutional debate over Congress’s authority on tariffs and taxes.

Read More

Canada Defies Trump: A Fight for Sovereignty, Not Just Trade

In response to President Trump’s trade war, Canada has implemented substantial counter-tariffs on US goods, totaling over C$95 billion (€61.1bn), the largest amount imposed by any country. These measures, including retaliatory tariffs on US vehicles, aim to pressure the Trump administration to reconsider its policies. Canada is collaborating with international partners, including the EU and Asian nations, to maximize pressure and believes that public pressure within the US is crucial to resolving the conflict. The minister emphasized the importance of a unified NATO to counter the potential benefits accruing to adversaries like China and Russia from Western divisions.

Read More

Trump Tells Americans Not to Panic Amidst Market Plunge

Despite global market selloffs and the S&P 500 entering bear territory, President Trump defended his new tariff policy, dubbed “Liberation Day” tariffs, predicting future “GREATNESS.” He urged critics to avoid weakness and stupidity, even coining the term “PANICAN” for those who doubt his approach. The Dow experienced a significant drop following the announcement, marking the third consecutive day of market declines. These tariffs, announced last week, have sparked a worldwide plunge in futures and foreign markets.

Read More

Trump’s $92 Million Military Parade: A Dictator’s Display of Self-Worship

Following a 2017 French military parade, Trump’s proposed U.S. equivalent faced significant opposition, with projected costs reaching $92 million for the military and over $21 million for Washington D.C. Subsequently, the plan was abandoned amidst criticism from D.C. officials and military leaders. However, recent changes in military leadership, including the dismissal of several high-ranking officials, may signal renewed efforts to pursue the parade, potentially bolstering legal defense against future challenges. This personnel shift suggests a change in the political landscape surrounding Trump’s long-held desire for a large-scale military parade.

Read More