Nearly 900 economists, including two Nobel laureates, have signed a letter condemning President Trump’s tariff policies as “misguided” and a potential cause of recession. The letter argues that these tariffs, based on flawed economic reasoning, contradict principles of liberty and will harm American workers through price increases. Signatories, representing a range of political viewpoints, criticize the administration’s “reciprocal” tariffs as economically unsound. Despite current volatility, the letter expresses hope that sound economic principles will ultimately prevail.
Read More
Harvard University rejected the Trump administration’s demands for sweeping changes to its operations in exchange for $9 billion in research funding. These demands, which included audits of academic programs and alterations to governance, were deemed unlawful infringements on the university’s independence and constitutional rights. The administration subsequently froze $2.2 billion in grants and $60 million in contracts. Harvard maintains its commitment to fighting antisemitism but insists these objectives will not be achieved through governmental overreach. The threatened funding cuts jeopardize vital research partnerships crucial to American innovation and global competitiveness.
Read More
President Trump’s recent physical examination, conducted by White House physician Sean Barbabella, revealed ostensibly positive results, including strong cognitive and physical health assessments. However, the inclusion of Trump’s “frequent victories in golf events” in the report suggests an attempt to appease the president’s ego rather than provide an objective health assessment. This prioritization of placating Trump’s ego over honest evaluation raises significant concerns regarding his mental health. The physician’s actions highlight a broader pattern within the White House of prioritizing Trump’s emotional needs over delivering difficult truths.
Read More
Widespread protests erupted across the US on Saturday, marking the second major wave of demonstrations this month against the Trump administration. Over 400 rallies, largely organized by the 50501 movement, took place nationwide and internationally, expressing opposition to perceived threats to democratic ideals and the second Trump presidency. Participants voiced concerns ranging from government overreach to the erosion of democratic principles, aiming to build a mass movement impacting future elections. The protests, drawing inspiration from historical events, aimed to pressure both politicians and the public into resisting Trump’s policies.
Read More
President Trump’s Truth Social post featured a manipulated image of Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s hand, allegedly showing an MS-13 gang tattoo. The image, however, was digitally altered to include labels and characters spelling “MS-13,” a fact noted by social media users who criticized the president for misleading the public. Trump’s actions follow his refusal to comply with court orders to return Abrego Garcia to the United States, despite lacking evidence of gang affiliation. While some defended Trump, arguing the alterations were obvious, others questioned the president’s interpretation of the tattoo itself.
Read More
Rep. Thanedar is calling for President Trump’s impeachment due to the deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to El Salvador, despite a Supreme Court order preventing his removal. The Trump administration claims the deportation was an “administrative error,” but has since refused to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return, defying a federal judge’s order. This defiance, according to Thanedar, constitutes an impeachable offense under Article Two of the U.S. Constitution. Further, the Salvadoran President has stated he will not return Abrego Garcia, despite the ongoing legal battle.
Read More
In *A.A.R.P. v. Trump*, the Supreme Court issued a late-night order halting the Trump administration’s deportation of Venezuelan immigrants. The administration allegedly moved these immigrants to a Texas facility, provided inadequate notice of deportation in English to primarily Spanish-speaking individuals, and planned immediate removal under the Alien Enemies Act, potentially violating a prior Supreme Court ruling. This action seemingly circumvented the Court’s previous mandate for due process before deportation. Justices Thomas and Alito dissented, with a further statement expected from Justice Alito.
Read More
The Supreme Court issued an emergency order halting the Trump administration’s attempt to deport Venezuelan migrants to an El Salvadoran prison before they could challenge their deportation. This late-night intervention, a highly unusual rebuke, stemmed from the administration’s alleged violation of a previous court order and its deceptive actions toward multiple courts. The Court’s swift action, bypassing lower courts and even a dissenting justice’s full opinion, suggests a lack of trust in the administration’s claims. The 7-2 vote, including Chief Justice Roberts and other typically more conservative justices, signals a potential shift in the Court’s approach towards the administration’s actions.
Read More
In response to increased US deportations, Mexico launched “México te abraza,” a national employment program offering immediate job opportunities to returning citizens. Partnering with the CCE, over 220 companies have committed 63,880 jobs across all 32 states, exceeding an initial 50,000-job pledge. These positions span various sectors and skill levels, with salaries ranging from $424 to over $2,000 USD monthly. The initiative aims to provide dignified employment and leverage the skills of returning Mexicans.
Read More
The Supreme Court issued an emergency order halting the Trump administration’s plan to deport Texas migrants to El Salvador under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act. This action prevents the removal of detainees within the Northern District of Texas pending further court review, reversing lower court decisions that refused to halt the deportations. Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the majority opinion. The ruling follows the ACLU’s appeal after a lower court judge found he lacked jurisdiction over the matter. The stay applies only to migrants detained in the specified district.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker