A resurfaced 2020 video shows President Trump stating that National Guard deployment requires a governor’s request, directly contradicting his recent actions in California. Despite California Governor Newsom’s request to withdraw the National Guard, Trump deployed 2,000 troops to Los Angeles, leading to arrests and escalating violence. Newsom subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging Trump illegally federalized the National Guard and threatened to deploy troops to other states without governors’ consent. Trump responded by suggesting Newsom’s arrest.
Read More
Following widespread protests in Los Angeles against ICE raids, Tom Homan, President Trump’s border czar, threatened to arrest California Governor Gavin Newsom for potential interference with law enforcement. Homan later claimed his comments were misconstrued, stating that arrest would only follow criminal acts like impeding law enforcement or harboring illegal aliens. Despite admitting neither Newsom nor Mayor Bass are accused of any wrongdoing, Homan maintained that no one is above the law. Newsom defiantly challenged Homan to make good on his threat.
Read More
Florida state Senator Ileana Garcia, a founder of Latinas for Trump, publicly denounced the Trump administration’s intensified immigration enforcement actions, stating that these actions are “unacceptable and inhumane” and contradict the values she believes in. Her criticism follows widespread protests against courthouse arrests and the revocation of temporary protected status for many immigrants, including those from Cuba and Venezuela. Garcia’s condemnation, alongside similar statements from other Florida Republicans, highlights a growing rift within the Republican party regarding the administration’s hardline immigration policies. These actions are causing significant distress within immigrant communities, despite Trump’s repeated promises of mass deportations during his campaign.
Read More
Seven hundred Marines have been deployed to Los Angeles, ostensibly to support the federalized National Guard, despite local authorities’ objections and a lack of any apparent emergency. This deployment, seemingly driven by President Trump’s political agenda, potentially violates the Posse Comitatus Act, prohibiting military involvement in domestic law enforcement. The action follows the federal government’s response to protests against ICE raids and raises serious concerns about the militarization of domestic politics and the potential for violence. Trump’s recent comments suggesting the arrest of Governor Newsom further escalate the situation and highlight the alarming trajectory towards authoritarianism.
Read More
The Trump administration seeks Supreme Court approval to circumvent the Convention Against Torture, arguing a loophole allows deportation to undisclosed countries, even if torture is likely. This tactic bypasses established procedures where immigrants can contest deportation to countries posing a credible threat of torture. The administration claims this applies even to those already deemed removable, ignoring existing legal protections and due process. The case hinges on jurisdictional arguments, with the administration asserting that courts lack the authority to review this practice, potentially leaving affected immigrants without any judicial recourse.
Read More
The Supreme Court issued a ruling allowing the Department of Government Efficiency access to sensitive Social Security Administration data, despite dissent from the Court’s Democratic justices. This decision, though perhaps predictable given precedent regarding executive branch data management, highlights the Court’s increasing use of the shadow docket to expedite cases brought by the Trump administration. Justice Jackson’s dissent criticizes the Court’s apparent abandonment of the “irreparable harm” requirement for granting emergency relief, particularly when compared to its treatment of similar requests from the Biden administration. This disparity suggests a potential double standard in the application of shadow docket rules based on the political affiliation of the involved administration.
Read More
Following immigration raids in Los Angeles, President Trump authorized the deployment of 2,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines, prompting Governor Newsom to denounce the move as reckless and a violation of state sovereignty. California subsequently filed a lawsuit challenging the deployment, arguing that Trump overstepped his authority. Days of protests, initially peaceful, escalated into clashes with law enforcement, resulting in arrests and property damage. The deployment marks a significant escalation, with the last such action without gubernatorial consent occurring in 1965.
Read More
President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to quell Los Angeles protests against ICE raids has sparked outrage. The “No Kings” coalition, organizing nationwide counter-protests against a planned military parade, condemned the administration’s actions as an escalation of tensions and an abuse of power intended to silence dissent. While some protestors engaged in violence and vandalism, Mayor Bass blamed the administration for provoking the unrest. Despite this, the “No Kings” coalition maintains its commitment to non-violent, de-escalation-trained protests planned for June 14th.
Read More
Graffiti threatening the lives of Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates was visible on a flatcar carrying military vehicles destined for a Washington, D.C. parade. The video, initially posted by the U.S. Army’s X account, garnered significant views before being removed following inquiries. The Army stated that the message did not reflect their values, and it remains unclear who created the graffiti or their affiliation with the military. The incident highlights the ongoing targeting of Fauci and Gates by conspiracy theories.
Read More
In response to ongoing protests in Los Angeles and escalating threats against federal personnel and buildings, President Trump deployed approximately 700 active-duty Marines from Camp Pendleton to supplement the National Guard. This action, taken without the consent of California Governor Newsom, represents a significant escalation of the federal response to the demonstrations. Newsom condemned the deployment, alleging a manufactured crisis and vowing legal action against the president. The deployment follows days of protests sparked by law enforcement actions against immigration demonstrators.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker