During a recent press conference, President Trump was criticized for misstating the end date of the Civil War while discussing birthright citizenship. He incorrectly cited 1869 as the war’s conclusion, sparking widespread online mockery. This gaffe led users to question his knowledge of American history and ability to pass a citizenship test, especially as he advocated against birthright citizenship, a concept rooted in the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court’s ruling could impact who qualifies for automatic citizenship based on birth within the United States.
Read More
Following recent military actions, President Trump stated that Iran must allow international inspections to verify its nuclear program, and that the United States is open to talks next week. However, Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi has indicated that the possibility of new negotiations is complicated by the recent American attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, which caused “serious damage”. The U.S. and Israel have both claimed to have severely damaged Iran’s nuclear capabilities, though the extent of the damage and the future of inspections remains uncertain. Iran has yet to decide whether to allow IAEA inspectors to assess the damage.
Read More
The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision restricting federal judges’ ability to issue universal injunctions, impacting cases like those challenging President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship. This ruling, split along ideological lines, enables the Trump administration to advance its policies and reinforces claims of judicial overreach. The case involved nationwide injunctions used to halt the order’s enforcement while lawsuits progressed. Ultimately, the court determined that universal injunctions likely surpass the authority granted to federal courts by Congress.
Read More
The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling, partially blocking nationwide injunctions against Donald Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett writing the majority opinion. The court’s decision limits the ability of lower courts to issue broad injunctions, aligning with arguments that such measures overreach the executive branch’s policy-making authority. Justice Sotomayor, in her dissent, argued the ruling would disproportionately impact the vulnerable. The court did not address the merits of the birthright citizenship order itself, maintaining the status quo while returning the case to lower courts to reconsider the scope of their orders.
Read More
As part of the discovery process, SMART Legislation submitted extensive document requests and questions to the Rockland County Board of Elections regarding the 2024 election results. The requests seek information on voting machines, software, security protocols, and communications with vendors, including software updates. The inquiries also questioned the use of technologies like Starlink’s Direct to Cell service. Furthermore, the lawsuit, with a full hand recount requested, highlights discrepancies in vote counts and statistical improbabilities within the 2024 election data. The next court hearing is a compliance conference set for September 22, 2025, at the Rockland County Courthouse.
Read More
This article explores the consumer shopping habits of readers. It informs consumers of the possibility of earning a commission through the article’s links. The Shopping Trends team, which is separate from the CTV News journalists, is responsible for the content. The article also provides some information for the readers about the Shopping Trends team.
Read More
The Trump administration has announced the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti, affecting over 520,000 Haitian nationals residing in the United States. This decision, set to expire on August 3, 2025, and take effect on September 2, 2025, reverses a prior extension granted by the Biden administration. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) claims that improved conditions in Haiti no longer warrant TPS, despite ongoing political instability and a rise in gang violence that has created a humanitarian crisis. Haitian immigrants and advocates are expressing strong opposition to the decision, citing the severe risks of returning to a country facing widespread insecurity and economic hardship.
Read More
The Miami City Commission voted to delay the November 2025 election to November 2026, effectively extending the terms of current officials, including term-limited Mayor Francis Suarez and Commissioner Joe Carollo. This decision has ignited controversy, with critics labeling it a “power grab” and alleging it disenfranchises voters who had already filed to run for office. Florida officials, including the Attorney General and Governor, have raised concerns over the legality of the shift, citing the city charter’s requirements for odd-year elections and voter approval for amendments. Despite this, the City Attorney cited a precedent from North Miami, upheld by the Third District Court of Appeals, which supports the commission’s ability to make such changes.
Read More
The Trump administration has discussed offering Iran significant incentives to return to the negotiating table, including potentially providing $20-$30 billion for a civilian nuclear program. These talks have occurred even amidst military strikes between Iran and Israel, with the US emphasizing that any agreement would require zero Iranian uranium enrichment. Preliminary proposals also involve easing sanctions and allowing Iran access to billions of dollars in frozen funds. US officials are seeking a “comprehensive peace agreement,” with the terms being discussed through regional intermediaries.
Read More
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Trump administration, allowing them to take steps to implement the proposal to end automatic birthright citizenship by limiting the scope of nationwide injunctions. In a 6-3 decision, the court determined that injunctions should apply only to the specific states, groups, and individuals that sued, enabling the policy to potentially proceed in states that did not challenge it. The ruling, which did not address the plan’s legal merits, sparked responses from plaintiffs who vowed to continue legal challenges, while the administration can now continue with its administrative work on implementation. The court also noted that the executive order would technically go into effect in 30 days.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker