Senator Bernie Sanders expressed support for President-elect Trump’s campaign proposal to cap credit card interest rates at 10%, a measure Sanders views as crucial to protecting working-class Americans from exorbitant fees currently averaging 21.5%. This contrasts with the Biden administration’s unsuccessful attempt to lower late fees. Sanders sees this as an opportunity for bipartisan cooperation, advocating for an end to what he terms “usury” by major banks.
Read More
Elon Musk’s America PAC has invested heavily in the 2022 midterms, contributing nearly $119 million to support Republican candidates in various races across the country. While the PAC’s spending, exceeding $19 million in some key House races, yielded mixed results, a significant $152 million was allocated towards supporting Donald Trump’s presidential bid. Musk’s actions demonstrate a considerable and highly publicized foray into US politics.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s choice for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, faced scrutiny after a 2017 sexual assault allegation, investigated by Monterey police but resulting in no charges, surfaced. The transition team was unaware of the detailed allegations before Hegseth’s nomination, raising concerns about inadequate vetting. While Hegseth’s attorney maintains the allegation is false, the incident and subsequent nondisclosure agreement have caused internal frustration. Despite this, President Trump continues to support Hegseth’s nomination.
Read More
Trump’s 2024 victory, while decisive in the Electoral College, stemmed more from Democratic underperformance than a massive surge in Trump support. His vote total only slightly exceeded his 2020 numbers, while Kamala Harris received nearly 10 million fewer votes than Joe Biden in 2020, largely due to the Biden administration’s unpopularity and Harris’s flawed, centrist campaign strategy. This strategic misstep, driven by party consultants and donors, alienated the Democratic base and failed to secure sufficient swing votes. Despite this loss, Democrats performed better in down-ballot races, suggesting that a broader shift away from the party did not occur.
Read More
My Supreme Court victory in *Trump v. United States* secured a historic win on presidential immunity, crucial in countering the “lawfare” attacks against me and the MAGA movement. During arguments, I successfully argued for broad presidential immunity, even extending to hypothetical scenarios involving actions such as assassinations. While acknowledging hypotheticals, my position maintained that such actions, if deemed “official acts,” would fall under this immunity. This ruling is a key defense against politically motivated legal challenges.
Read More
Donald Trump is attempting to install controversial figures like Matt Gaetz and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. into his administration, bypassing Senate confirmation through threats and potential unconstitutional actions. Should the Senate refuse to confirm his nominees, Trump intends to leverage the power of recess appointments, or even adjourn Congress himself—a drastic measure with potentially catastrophic consequences for the constitutional balance of power. This action is perceived by many as a blatant disregard for established democratic processes and a power grab. However, some believe that Republican senators will ultimately uphold their constitutional responsibilities and prevent Trump from succeeding.
Read More
Despite plans for a large-scale deportation operation, the incoming Trump administration is avoiding the term “camps” to describe the necessary detention facilities, fearing negative historical comparisons and the perception of extremism. While top advisor Stephen Miller previously used the term, the administration now recognizes the potentially damaging optics of such language. The administration is instead focusing on messaging that emphasizes “targeted arrests” and the deportation of families together. This shift in terminology reflects a strategic effort to mitigate public backlash against the proposed immigration policy.
Read More
During a recent podcast, I argued that a merciful approach to border security involves shooting and killing migrants who approach the wall after being warned, thereby deterring further illegal immigration. This “Biblical Justice,” I contend, would punish a few while deterring many, preventing the suffering of families separated during deportation. My proposal, however, is far outside of mainstream Republican policy, despite my support for President Trump. I believe a complete halt to immigration is necessary, and this drastic measure would achieve that goal.
Read More
Following President-elect Trump’s victory, Advocates for Trans Equality, Jewish Voice for Peace, and Reproductive Freedom for All have reported increased community outreach and anxiety regarding potential rights rollbacks. These groups, along with other leftist organizers, anticipate heightened challenges in advancing transgender rights, reproductive freedom, and Palestinian liberation under a second Trump administration. Despite fear, these organizations remain resolute in their commitment to advocacy and building collective power to protect hard-won rights and freedoms. They are urging community members to take proactive steps to safeguard their legal protections while preparing for an anticipated escalation in resistance.
Read More
Despite initial bipartisan support, the bill aimed at curbing anti-Israel protests faces a renewed House vote following a Rules Committee hearing. This legislation, concerningly, poses a significant threat to First Amendment rights, granting potentially abusive powers. The bill’s passage would be especially alarming given recent events, raising concerns about potential misuse by the incoming administration. The ACLU rightly celebrated its initial defeat, highlighting the bill’s inherent dangers. With a narrow GOP majority, securing passage now necessitates further Democratic support.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker