US Election 2024

Trump Flies US Flag at Full Mast During Carter’s Mourning Period

Following former President Carter’s death, flags at Mar-a-Lago were initially lowered to half-staff but have since been raised to full-staff, despite official directives from President Biden and Governor DeSantis to maintain half-staff through January 28th. This action contradicts the established mourning period and comes after Trump expressed displeasure with the timing. Texas Governor Abbott conversely ordered state flags to be at full-staff on Inauguration Day, prioritizing the celebration of the incoming president. Trump previously offered condolences for Carter, attending his funeral services.

Read More

Texas Governor Orders Flags to Full Staff for Trump’s Inauguration, Defying Carter Mourning

In response to President Biden’s order to fly flags at half-staff for 30 days following President Carter’s death, Texas Governor Greg Abbott directed that state flags be raised to full-staff on January 20th, 2025, for President Trump’s inauguration. This decision cites a federal statute mandating flag display on Inauguration Day, contrasting with President Trump’s opposition to half-staff flags on his inauguration day. Governor Abbott’s statement acknowledged mourning for President Carter while celebrating the inauguration and the nation’s transition of power.

Read More

Poland Backs Trump’s 5% NATO Defense Spending Call

Poland’s Defence Minister, Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz, supports Donald Trump’s call for NATO members to increase defence spending to 5% of GDP, viewing it as a necessary wake-up call for Europe. Poland, already a top spender at 4.12% of GDP in 2024, aims to reach 4.7% this year and advocates for a significant increase in EU defence spending. This stance reflects Poland’s leading role in bolstering European security, particularly in light of the war in Ukraine, and its commitment to strengthening NATO’s collective defence. Kosiniak-Kamysz highlights Poland’s substantial military investment and its active support for Ukraine as evidence of its commitment to this goal.

Read More

Appeals Court Forces Release of Trump Election Subversion Report

Judge Aileen Cannon will allow the release of special counsel Jack Smith’s report on Donald Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, but temporarily blocked disclosure of the classified documents section pending a hearing. This decision follows Trump’s legal challenges delaying the report’s publication, despite the Justice Department’s historical practice of releasing such reports. While the election interference volume may be released soon, the classified documents portion remains under court-ordered restriction, potentially jeopardizing congressional and public access to these investigations. Trump and his team have yet to indicate whether they will appeal the ruling.

Read More

Trump Desperate to Bury Damning Findings: Why It Won’t Matter

Following Donald Trump’s reelection, Special Counsel Jack Smith’s cases against him concluded due to Justice Department guidelines prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting president. Smith’s resignation, characterized by Trump as a firing, prompted a flurry of attacks from the president-elect, fueled by concerns over the impending release of Smith’s final report. Trump’s efforts to block the report’s release, despite a draft review by his legal team, highlight a potential legal battle. The report’s ultimate public release remains uncertain, with the possibility of Supreme Court involvement.

Read More

Judge Allows Release of Trump Election Interference Report

Judge Aileen Cannon denied a request to extend an injunction preventing the Justice Department from releasing a portion of Jack Smith’s report detailing President-elect Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This allows the report’s release, barring further legal action, while a separate section concerning classified documents remains under injunction pending a Friday hearing. A Justice Department motion to immediately release the January 6th-related portion is still awaiting a ruling from the 11th Circuit. The report’s release comes days before Trump’s inauguration, despite his denial of wrongdoing and prior indictments.

Read More

Trump’s Economic Silence: A Distraction or a Sign of Things to Come?

Donald Trump’s recent public appearances have shifted focus away from economic issues, despite his past campaign promises to curb inflation. This change coincides with positive economic indicators under President Biden, including low unemployment and inflation. However, Trump’s proposed policies, such as tariffs, could negatively impact the economy in the long term, a point Democrats are increasingly emphasizing. Democrats aim to highlight this potential economic downturn as Trump’s responsibility, framing any future economic woes as a direct consequence of his actions.

Read More

Trump’s Tariffs: A Hunger Games for the Little Guy

The recent surge in Bitcoin’s value and Wall Street’s optimistic forecasts for 2025 paint a picture of booming wealth for the super-rich, contrasting sharply with an 18 percent increase in homelessness. Trump’s economic policies, particularly threatened tariffs, are expected to disproportionately benefit large corporations with resources for lobbying and navigating complex exemption processes, leaving small businesses struggling with increased costs and uncertainty. This widening class divide exacerbates existing economic inequalities, with the biggest businesses poised to exploit the situation while smaller enterprises face significant challenges. Economists predict that while business confidence may rise, hiring and investment may not reflect this optimism.

Read More

Trump, Musk, & Zuckerberg Attack EU Digital Regulations

A major offensive against European digital regulations and competition policy, spearheaded by Donald Trump and prominent American tech CEOs like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, is underway. Zuckerberg, previously a target of Trump’s ire, now pledges allegiance, echoing Musk’s rhetoric against “censorship” and aligning with Trump’s agenda to challenge global government oversight of American businesses. This coordinated effort, evidenced by Musk’s involvement in European political debates and Zuckerberg’s public criticism of EU fines, has sparked considerable concern in Brussels. The European Parliament plans to address this challenge through a future debate on EU digital regulation.

Read More