The Trump administration has appealed to the Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of the president’s executive order regarding birthright citizenship, arguing that the long-held understanding of the 14th Amendment is “mistaken.” This appeal follows lower court rulings that have blocked the policy, citing the Constitution and precedent, including the case of *US v. Wong Kim Ark*. The administration contends the policy is crucial for border security, asserting that American citizenship should only be granted to those lawfully entitled. The ACLU, which has been involved in lawsuits against the order, has voiced opposition, calling the order illegal.
Read More
The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of an executive order that would end birthright citizenship, marking the second time this year the issue has been brought before the justices. The administration’s appeal argues that the long-held understanding of the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to those born in the U.S., is “mistaken.” The order was blocked by lower courts, with the administration now seeking a final ruling to resolve the issue. The executive order, signed in January, stated that the federal government will not recognize the U.S. citizenship of children born on American soil to parents who were in the country unlawfully or temporarily.
Read More
Recent government data reveals that immigrants with no criminal record now constitute the largest group in U.S. immigration detention, surpassing those with criminal histories or pending charges. This shift marks the first time under the Trump administration that the number of non-criminal immigrants in detention has exceeded those with criminal backgrounds. Furthermore, the surge in arrests has led to an increase in collateral arrests, contributing to the detention of individuals with no prior record and even some who are legally in the US. Despite DHS’s claims of targeting “the worst of the worst,” the data contradicts this narrative, raising concerns about inhumane treatment in detention facilities and a complete vilification of immigrants.
Read More
South Carolina House member RJ May, under the screen name “joebidennnn69,” has agreed to plead guilty to distributing child sexual abuse material. The former Republican, who resigned earlier this year, is accused of exchanging 220 files of child sexual abuse content on Kik. Facing up to 20 years in prison per count, May will also be required to register as a sex offender and could be fined $250,000. May, who acted as his own attorney, is scheduled to formally change his plea in federal court.
Read More
Vice President JD Vance recently addressed economic concerns, acknowledging that housing and grocery prices are too high. Despite the timing, Vance attributed the issue to the “disastrous Biden economy,” even though the Trump administration has been in power for over eight months. This statement was made amidst concerns about the struggling U.S. economy and a surge in popularity for Democratic New York mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani. Recent data revealed inflation rose 0.4 percent in August and 2.9 percent in the past 12 months.
Read More
Following a major donor’s complaint, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem expedited over $11 million in disaster assistance funds for a Naples, Florida pier project that had stalled. The pier, a significant tourist attraction, had been damaged by Hurricane Ian, and city officials were facing delays with FEMA, overseen by Noem’s department. The donor, who had contributed to Noem’s campaign, reached out to the Secretary, resulting in swift action and a subsequent visit by Noem to the pier, with the trip expenses unclear. This occurred as FEMA faced scrutiny for delays, with Noem’s policy of personally signing off on large purchases contributing to bottlenecks.
Read More
The indictment of former FBI Director James Comey has sparked controversy, with some within the Justice Department calling it one of the “worst abuses” in the department’s history. Comey is accused of making false statements and obstructing a congressional proceeding, charges he denies. The indictment came shortly after former President Donald Trump urged the pursuit of his political foes, including Comey, via social media. Trump has also suggested the indictment was part of a revenge operation against his political opponents.
Read More
On July 8, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein faced charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy in New York City. Recently, the House Oversight Committee released partially redacted files related to Epstein, revealing names like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Steve Bannon. These documents, obtained through a probe investigating the government’s handling of the Epstein case, included over 8,500 documents. The files contain itineraries and notes by Epstein detailing invitations, trips, and meetings with prominent individuals.
Read More
President Trump recently announced his intention to declassify and release government records related to Amelia Earhart’s disappearance, a move that quickly drew criticism online. The announcement, made on his social media platform, Truth Social, prompted widespread mockery, with many users urging him to focus instead on releasing the long-awaited Jeffrey Epstein files. Social media reactions ranged from humorous comparisons of the two situations to pointed questions about the priorities of the former president. Critics highlighted the contrast between the focus on Earhart and the continued non-release of the Epstein files, suggesting a misdirection of attention.
Read More
Newly released documents from House Oversight Democrats reveal Jeffrey Epstein’s connections with prominent figures, including scheduled meetings with Peter Thiel and Steve Bannon, along with a planned visit to Epstein’s island by Elon Musk. The documents, released amidst Republican efforts to halt the release of the Epstein files, are part of a larger push for transparency by Democrats. Concerns about protecting survivors’ identities led to some redactions within the documents. These revelations come as a House resolution for the Epstein Files Transparency Act is gaining momentum, facing opposition from Republican leadership and potential pressure on certain Republican co-signers.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker