The Supreme Court’s recent ruling in *Trump v. United States* established a broad interpretation of “presidential immunity,” suggesting a president may be absolutely immune from criminal prosecution for actions falling within their “conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority.” This invention, not explicitly found in the Constitution, has emboldened former President Trump and his allies, who appear to believe they are shielded from future accountability for potential misconduct. Critics argue that this ruling, particularly the notion that it could shield presidents from bribery or ordering assassinations, is a misinterpretation of constitutional principles and alien to American traditions.
Read More
Recently released body camera footage depicts Tulsa police ordering the anti-war group Food Not Bombs (FNB) to cease their meal distribution to the homeless and subsequently arresting four activists. The arrests occurred after the activists asserted their First Amendment rights, while police cited the need for a special permit and public health concerns. This incident is part of an ongoing conflict where groups like FNB view feeding the needy as a form of protected expression, a stance supported by some federal court rulings, while city governments often deem unpermitted food distribution a public health issue. Despite FNB’s claims of consistent, uneventful distributions for years, Tulsa police maintained that the group had been repeatedly notified about permit requirements and had previously caused disruptions and left behind debris.
Read More
Larry Bushart has settled his federal lawsuit for $835,000 after being wrongfully jailed for 37 days over an anti-Trump meme posted on Facebook. The meme was misinterpreted by local law enforcement as a threat of mass violence, leading to Bushart’s arrest based on a flawed affidavit. This settlement serves as compensation for the injustice Bushart endured and aims to send a message to law enforcement nationwide about respecting First Amendment rights.
Read More
Two police officers who defended the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, have filed a lawsuit to block payouts from a new $1.776 billion settlement fund. The officers allege the “Anti-Weaponization Fund” is an illegal slush fund intended to benefit individuals who committed politically motivated acts, including those who assaulted law enforcement during the Capitol riot. This legal challenge contends the fund, stemming from a settlement of Donald Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS, is a “corrupt sham” that incentivizes violence and improperly rewards insurrectionists.
Read More
Tennessee officials have agreed to a $835,000 settlement with Larry Bushart, a retired police officer who was incarcerated for 37 days after sharing a Facebook meme. The meme, which referenced an Iowa school shooting and included a quote attributed to Donald Trump, was deemed threatening by authorities despite Bushart’s insistence that it was protected speech. This case highlights a rare instance where online expression led to criminal prosecution, resulting in significant personal and professional repercussions for Bushart. The settlement underscores the importance of respecting First Amendment rights, particularly in times of heightened tension and civil discourse.
Read More
The Department of Homeland Security’s argument that a CDC travel order prevents an individual’s return to the U.S. has been challenged by her legal team. They argue that her deportation occurred prior to any outbreak and that she is currently in an area without reported cases, while also highlighting her pre-existing medical conditions that require specialized care. A federal judge has previously ruled that the individual cannot be returned to her birth country due to the threat of torture, and most recently, ordered the U.S. government to bring her back to the United States, acknowledging her history of severe abuse.
Read More
During a commencement address at the Coast Guard Academy, President Trump exhibited slurred speech, reportedly struggling with words such as “strength.” This occurred amidst a speech that deviated from tradition by becoming overtly political, including airing personal grievances and praising his administration’s policies. The President’s speech also touched on themes of perseverance for the graduates, advising them to “never, ever give up” in the face of adversity.
Read More
In Morgan County, Georgia, residents facing water contamination issues from a new Meta data center have found an unexpected ally in New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Despite the county’s strong Trump-supporting base, Ocasio-Cortez traveled to the area to hear firsthand accounts of the water quality decline, which has rendered tap water undrinkable for some families. She brought samples of the contaminated water to a congressional hearing, highlighting the need for national attention on such environmental impacts from large tech facilities. This unlikely collaboration underscores a shared concern over corporate environmental practices, bridging partisan divides.
Read More
A former federal prosecutor in Florida has been indicted for allegedly emailing a sealed special counsel report concerning President Donald Trump’s classified documents to her personal account. Carmen Lineberger, who worked in the U.S. Attorney’s Office, faces charges including theft and concealment of government property. Prosecutors claim she disguised the report by renaming it “Bundt_Cake_Recipe.pdf” to circumvent a judicial order prohibiting its dissemination. The indictment also details her sending other internal Justice Department documents to herself, similarly disguised as recipes.
Read More
The Colorado Democratic Party’s central committee voted to censure Governor Jared Polis with an overwhelming 89.8% majority. This action stems from Governor Polis’s decision to commute the sentence of former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, who was convicted of tampering with election equipment. Critics argue this decision undermines election integrity and public accountability, while Governor Polis contends his decision was based on an objective review of sentencing disparities and the appellate court’s concerns about the original sentence’s consideration of free speech. The censure temporarily bars the governor from participating in party-sponsored events.
Read More