Jimmy Kimmel Has Supreme Court Precedent on His Side, or at Least, He Did
Jimmy Kimmel has Supreme Court precedent on his side, specifically referencing the 1963 case *Bantam Books v. Sullivan*. This pivotal ruling established a clear boundary: governmental entities cannot employ indirect methods to suppress constitutionally protected speech. The core of this precedent rests on the idea that the government cannot coerce or intimidate private parties into censoring others. The key question is whether the government official’s actions could reasonably be understood as a threat of adverse consequences aimed at coercing a private party to punish or suppress someone else’s speech on the government’s behalf.… Continue reading
So, about those “Don’t Tread on Me” folks and the whole Walz/National Guard situation… it seems the core sentiment here is a pretty cynical one. The general consensus, if you can call it that, is that the rallying cry of “Don’t Tread on Me” has always been, at best, a highly selective sentiment.
The initial reaction seems to be a resounding “Where are they, indeed?” The implication is that these folks, who once waved the Gadsden flag with such fervor, are mysteriously absent when the metaphorical boots start marching on other people. It’s not hard to see why. The comments paint a picture of a group primarily concerned with their own self-interests, or perhaps the interests of a very specific in-group.… Continue reading
Deep strike: Ukrainian drones hit major Russian oil plants 1,300 km from front lines – that’s the headline, and it’s a significant one. It really drives home just how far Ukraine can now reach inside Russia, delivering what amounts to a harsh dose of reality to the enemy’s doorstep, or, more accurately, their gas station. It’s a testament to the ingenuity and determination of the Ukrainian forces. This isn’t just about military targets; it’s about disrupting the very fabric of Russia’s war machine, potentially forcing them to confront their own resource limitations and perhaps even start importing fuel again, which would be quite a reversal.… Continue reading
FTC Accuses Live Nation, Ticketmaster of Colluding with Ticket Brokers. This is a headline that’s buzzing, and honestly, it’s got a lot of people feeling a mix of emotions, from frustration to a strange sense of “told you so.” It seems the Federal Trade Commission is taking aim at the behemoths of the live entertainment industry, and the accusation is a serious one: collusion with ticket brokers.
Now, what does this actually mean? Well, it suggests that Live Nation and Ticketmaster, the dominant forces in the ticketing game, may have been working behind the scenes with ticket brokers, essentially scalpers, to manipulate the market.… Continue reading
In Charlie Kirk’s Name: Trump Officials Signal Move to Limit Free Speech
It’s truly mind-boggling, isn’t it? This whole situation, the talk about limiting free speech in the name of someone like Charlie Kirk, it’s just… ironic doesn’t even begin to cover it. It’s a stark reminder, a chilling echo of historical patterns, as we’ve seen before with groups that started as fringe elements, seizing on societal anxieties and promising simple solutions. It’s a dangerous game, playing on fears and frustrations to consolidate power. And frankly, it’s all a bit insane.
The parallels, the opportunistic seizing of a tragedy for political gain – it’s all too familiar.… Continue reading
Democrats are clear: a government shutdown might be the only way to send a potent message to the Trump administration. It’s a strategy born from a deep concern about the direction the country is headed, a feeling that fundamental rights and freedoms are under attack. This is more than just political posturing; it’s a calculated move, a high-stakes gamble to recalibrate the balance of power.
The core of this argument centers on the idea that traditional methods of opposition aren’t working. Things are “really bad” as some describe it. There’s a perception that certain groups are being unfairly targeted, that free speech is under threat, and that the checks and balances of government are being ignored.… Continue reading
Poland and NATO deploy 30,000 soldiers in military drills. The recent military exercises involving Poland and other NATO allies, deploying a significant force of 30,000 soldiers, have a clear focus on readiness and deterrence. We’re seeing a very tangible demonstration of commitment to collective defense, not just a show of force. This isn’t just about flexing muscles; it’s about honing skills and building trust, making sure everyone is on the same page. The scale itself speaks volumes, sending a clear message about the seriousness of the situation and the dedication to protecting the alliance’s eastern flank.
Poland and NATO deploy 30,000 soldiers in military drills, and it’s more than just boots on the ground.… Continue reading
German journalists union criticises decision to take Jimmy Kimmel off air, and that’s where this story really begins, doesn’t it? It’s a situation that’s clearly caught the attention of a lot of people, and for good reason. The core of the issue is pretty straightforward: a prominent voice, a late-night comedian known for his political commentary, is suddenly removed from the air. And naturally, that sparks concerns about freedom of speech and the potential for censorship. When you have a union of journalists speaking out, that carries weight. They understand the importance of a free press and the dangers of suppressing voices, so their criticism carries significant weight.… Continue reading
Australian Broadcasting Corporation blocked from UK press conference after clash with Trump. This is the headline that paints a pretty clear picture, doesn’t it? It feels like we’ve stumbled into a movie plot, one where the lines between reality and a dystopian future are getting awfully blurry. We’re talking about a situation where a respected journalist, John Lyons from the ABC, dared to ask a question, a very reasonable question, about wealth accumulation. The answer? Well, instead of a cogent response, the response involved accusations of “hurting Australia” and a threat to tattle on the journalist to his Prime Minister. Seriously?… Continue reading
Alright, let’s dive into this complex situation. It seems we’re talking about a man named Khalil, and the central issue is this: a US immigration judge has ordered his deportation, but his lawyers are arguing that a separate ruling protects him. It’s a legal tangle, a clash of rulings, and a serious cause for concern, especially when we’re talking about someone’s freedom and future.
The immediate problem here is the authority of the “immigration judge.” From what I gather, this isn’t a regular judge. These judges are part of the Department of Justice, and they handle immigration-related matters. The crux of the matter seems to be that this judge’s order may not hold the same weight as a ruling from a court with more established legal authority, a court of “real judges” as someone put it.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood