John Q. Hosedrinker

Garland to Release Trump Jan. 6 Report: Too Little, Too Late?

Special Counsel Jack Smith submitted his final report on the Trump investigations to Attorney General Merrick Garland. Garland intends to publicly release volume one, concerning Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, pending the Eleventh Circuit’s decision on a temporary injunction. Volume two, related to the classified documents case, will remain confidential to protect ongoing co-defendant cases, though limited access will be granted to Congressional leadership. The Justice Department is seeking to vacate the injunction, allowing for immediate release of volume one if the appeals court rules in their favor.

Read More

Trump’s Global Gamble: A Monopoly of Mayhem

President-elect Trump’s recent comments signal a potentially aggressive second term in foreign policy. He openly discussed using military force to reclaim the Panama Canal and Greenland, while threatening economic pressure to annex Canada. Furthermore, he proposed renaming the Gulf of Mexico and demanding a significant increase in NATO defense spending. These actions demonstrate a willingness to challenge long-standing alliances and disregard international norms.

Read More

Trump Campaign Received Advance Fox News Town Hall Questions

Alex Isenstadt’s forthcoming book, “Revenge,” alleges a serious breach of journalistic ethics at Fox News. According to the book, a Fox News insider leaked the questions for a January 2024 Trump town hall to the Trump campaign, giving the candidate an unfair advantage. This incident, based on multiple sources, highlights the close relationship between Trump and some within Fox News, a relationship further illustrated by Trump’s prior consideration of Maria Bartiromo as his running mate, a choice ultimately vetoed by his team. Fox News denies the allegations but plans an investigation.

Read More

Trump Considers National Economic Emergency to Justify New Tariffs

President-elect Trump is considering invoking the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify widespread tariffs on both allies and adversaries, aiming to reshape global trade. This action would grant him broad authority to implement tariffs without needing to demonstrate national security concerns, a feature appealing to Trump. Alternative legal avenues, including sections 338 and 301 of US trade law, are also under consideration, but IEEPA offers a faster route to implementing tariffs. While no final decision has been made, the potential for a national economic emergency declaration is actively being discussed.

Read More

Judge Cannon Lacks Basis to Block Jack Smith’s Report: Analyst

Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, temporarily blocked the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report investigating President-elect Trump, prompting immediate criticism. This action follows Cannon’s earlier dismissal of the classified documents case against Trump. Legal analyst Lisa Rubin argued Cannon lacks jurisdiction to issue such a stay, given her prior ruling. The stay remains in effect until three days after the appeals court rules on the matter, a timeline raising questions about its potential duration beyond Trump’s inauguration. The report’s release is opposed by Trump and his co-defendants.

Read More

Ukrainian Special Ops Decimate North Korean Forces in Kursk Offensive

Ukrainian Special Operations Forces (SSO) recently reported eliminating 13 North Korean soldiers in Russia’s Kursk Oblast, employing both ground combat and drone strikes. The operation, part of ongoing SSO activity in the region since August 2024, involved multiple regiments and resulted in the recovery of weapons and documents suggesting the presence of North Korean officers. These actions are a response to Russia’s deployment of North Korean troops to bolster its forces facing Ukrainian offensives. The SSO’s actions have resulted in significant losses for both Russian and North Korean forces in the Kursk Oblast.

Read More

DOJ to Partially Release Trump Report; Outrage Erupts Over Withholding of Full Findings

The Justice Department intends to release special counsel Jack Smith’s report on Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election, but will withhold the section concerning classified documents at Mar-a-Lago while charges against Trump co-defendants remain pending. This decision follows a judge’s temporary block on the report’s release. The department argues the release of the election interference portion is justified and will be shared with congressional leaders, while the classified documents section will remain confidential to protect the co-defendants’ interests. The Justice Department is appealing the judge’s order, seeking to release the election interference findings completely.

Read More

Trump’s War Threats: A Distraction from Legal Troubles and the “America First” Scam

President Trump’s proposed renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America,” while symbolically significant, faces international hurdles. This action, along with his threats of coercion to acquire Greenland and regain control of the Panama Canal, are viewed as nationalistic gestures rather than practical policy solutions. These proposals, coupled with his past campaign promises, highlight a potential contradiction between his stated desire for reduced foreign involvement and his actions suggesting a renewed focus on territorial expansion and control of global waterways. His rhetoric raises concerns about the erosion of U.S. credibility and the potential for unnecessary conflict.

Read More

Florida’s Civilian Police Oversight Dismantled: DeSantis’s New Law Sparks Outrage

A new Florida law, effective July 1st, has severely curtailed the operations of civilian review boards overseeing law enforcement misconduct investigations. The law mandates law enforcement-led investigations, restricts civilian board oversight, and requires at least one retired law enforcement officer on each panel. This has led to the dissolution or suspension of at least 15 boards across the state, despite arguments that such boards build community trust and improve police-community relations. Supporters of the law contend it ensures consistency in investigations and avoids discouraging police applicants. However, critics argue the law undermines accountability and damages community trust.

Read More