A Daily Beast analysis of President Trump’s schedule over the past three months reveals a consistent pattern of late-night social media activity followed by largely clear mornings. In June, he was seen publicly in Washington D.C. before 11 a.m. only three times, with “Executive Time” dominating his early schedule on most days. This nocturnal habit, reportedly linked to sleeping in separate bedrooms with the First Lady, has been noted to result in him appearing to doze off during late afternoon public events. The White House offered no specific explanation for his schedule, instead providing a general statement about his “sharpness” and “unmatched energy.”
Read the original article here
A recent analysis by The Daily Beast has brought to light what many have long suspected: a shockingly lazy schedule for Donald Trump, reportedly 80 years old. This isn’t a newfound revelation for many, as the idea of a man who allegedly falls asleep during meetings being particularly industrious has always seemed a stretch. It appears that the Trump administration, for many observers, has functioned more like a taxpayer-funded retirement plan for an 80-year-old billionaire, rather than a dynamic engine of governance.
The notion that Trump has ever held a “real job” in the traditional sense, one that requires consistent effort and tangible output, is met with widespread skepticism. For the roughly 35% of the country still firmly within what’s described as his “cult,” perhaps the extent of his lack of work ethic comes as a surprise. However, for many others, the reported schedule paints a picture that is almost comically unsurvivable if true, detailing activities like wallowing in self-pity, staring into the abyss, and then, perhaps humorously, solving world hunger before anyone else is aware.
The imagined daily routine continues with somewhat less ambitious pursuits, like jazzercise, followed by dinner, and then a deep dive into wrestling with self-loathing. This is then juxtaposed with a more grounded, albeit grim, list: waking up, eating, experiencing accidental bowel movements, eating again, and then firing off incoherent rants on Truth Social multiple times. The cycle of eating, falling asleep during important meetings, and more late-night rants, punctuated by further eating and sleeping, paints a picture of a life remarkably devoid of demanding labor.
Adding a layer of alleged criminality to this lethargic existence, the thought is that illegal activities are simply sprinkled throughout the day. Interestingly, some express a grudging acceptance of Trump doing nothing, as his inactivity is often seen as far less harmful than his potential for action. The suggestion that he might have been better suited as a First Lady, focusing on ceremony and appearances rather than the substantive work of the presidency, resonates with some who recall his administration’s struggles to even initiate a workday in the first term.
The “cult members” who insist he works incredibly hard, so hard in fact that he falls asleep, are often met with derision, with some describing them as the “dumbest motherfuckers to ever walk the earth.” The concept of “executive time,” often touted as a period of intense work, is sarcastically dismissed as sounding like a lot of effort. Beyond his age, concerns about rapid dementia are also raised, suggesting that Trump never truly desired the responsibilities of the presidency.
Instead, the focus seems to be on self-enrichment, with suggestions that he is merely a figurehead for those pulling the strings, such as Stephen Miller or Howard Lutnick. The memory of him offering potential running mates the chance to be in charge of both domestic and foreign policy during his Republican nomination bid resurfaces, underscoring his disinterest in the actual duties of the office. His expertise, it is argued, lies solely in marketing himself and his brand, evident in his desire for prominent placements like the Arc, his name on the Kennedy Center, and even the outlandish idea of being added to Mount Rushmore.
The lack of surprise regarding his reportedly lazy schedule is palpable, with the expectation being that any action he takes will be entirely self-serving. The ability to execute thousands of insider trading movements, however, remains a point of contention or perhaps a testament to how much can be achieved with minimal direct effort, if one is sufficiently inclined towards illicit activities.
A detail about Melania reportedly making Trump sleep in the living room is shared, which, while perhaps gossipy, is seen by some as perfectly in character for an older man. However, the sentiment is that if one is going to elect individuals into such demanding roles, they shouldn’t be so elderly that their lives are expected to consist solely of lounging and napping. The contrast is drawn with the idea that he is only interested in the pageantry and self-dealing associated with the presidency, not the governing or constitutional obligations.
The notion that he worked 16-hour days, seven days a week for no pay, is sarcastically challenged. It is argued that he has masterfully demonstrated that one doesn’t need to work hard to be corrupt, incompetent, and insufferable, and that bamboozling millions is, in fact, easy work, potentially setting a new model for future political figures. A hypothetical, albeit cynical, schedule is presented, involving waking up intermittently, McDonald’s for breakfast, stock manipulation, illicit encounters, promoting cryptocurrency, more market manipulation, accepting bribes, spewing hate, and repeating the cycle.
The fact that his staff reportedly wouldn’t schedule meetings until noon during his first term because he preferred to watch and call into Fox News in the mornings is recalled. The question is posed whether anyone truly wants Trump to do more, given the consequences of his actions when he does engage. The basic adulting principle that staying up all night ranting on social media leads to an inability to function the next day is highlighted.
The question of what is truly “shocking” about this alleged laziness is raised, with suggestions to add “Laziest” to a list that already includes “most corrupt,” “most incompetent,” “most unpopular,” “stupidest,” and his status as the only convicted felon, fraudster, and adjudicated rapist. The comparison to a toddler fighting naps, moaning in a crib, and humorously referring to that as “executive time” due to Trump’s alleged habits, adds a touch of dark humor.
The recollection of an interview where Trump himself admitted the presidency was “too much work” before he even considered running is brought up, with the thought that perhaps such honesty should disqualify candidates. The idea that one should have demonstrated kindness or generosity to be considered for public office is presented, a quality many feel Trump has never exhibited.
While acknowledging that an 80-year-old has earned the right to sleep when they please, an exception is made for Trump, who is accused of lampooning others while allegedly dozing off in the White House, allowing his family and followers to exploit the country. The rapid accumulation of wealth by those associated with him is noted, contrasting it with the covert corruption of figures from Venezuela. The observation that he has “never worked a day in his life…and it shows” is a common refrain.
The suggestion that his social media posts were not written by him in real-time, but rather posted by staff at night to create an illusion of constant activity, is put forth. This isn’t seen as new, echoing a similar “work ethic” during his first term. The speculation about his and Melania’s separate bedrooms being attributed to him being a “night owl” is met with skepticism, implying it’s a convenient excuse.
Ultimately, the argument is made that if he causes less damage with his delusions, that’s a positive outcome. However, the results speak for themselves, with accusations that he hasn’t done anything constructive, aside from harming children, women, and America. The mention of him keeping “Moscow time” suggests a loyalty or subservience to external interests, further adding to the critical assessment.
The surprising resilience of his golf game, despite his age, is noted, especially in light of him previously calling Biden “sleepy.” While some express a lack of sympathy, they claim to understand the laziness given his age and alleged health conditions, but the real problem, in their view, lies with the people allowing this to happen to maintain power. The article concludes with a somewhat backhanded compliment to The Daily Beast for performing “a modicum of journalism.”
