By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Evidence presented by a Mississippi family challenges police claims that their 1-year-old child was killed when officers fired into a vehicle that was heading toward them. A preliminary autopsy suggests the baby was shot from the side, not the front, according to civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who argues this contradicts officers’ accounts. The shooting, which occurred after police were called to a Walmart parking lot, has led to protests and calls for transparency regarding police body camera and surveillance footage.
Read the original article here
The autopsy release concerning the Mississippi baby, Kohen Wiley, tragically killed by police gunfire, paints a starkly different picture from the initial accounts provided by law enforcement. The preliminary findings suggest the one-year-old was shot from the side of the car, a detail that directly contradicts the officers’ claims that the vehicle was heading towards them, creating a life-or-death scenario. This is a critical divergence, as civil rights attorney Ben Crump highlighted that the bullet entered Kohen’s torso on his right side and exited on his left, a trajectory that aligns with the car being shot from the side, not the front. The presence of clusters of cuts on the baby’s chest and abdomen, attributed to broken tempered glass, further supports this side-angle entry of the projectile.
The circumstances surrounding the shooting are deeply troubling, particularly the initial reason for police involvement: an alleged shoplifting of diapers at a Walmart. This alleged offense, concerning a basic necessity, feels disproportionate to the tragic outcome. The fact that Kohen and his mother are Black adds another layer to the outrage, especially in Senatobia, a town with a documented history of concerning police encounters. This incident has understandably ignited protests, fueled by a community demanding accountability and transparency in a situation where a child’s life was lost.
A significant point of contention and public frustration is the prolonged delay in releasing any video evidence. While authorities are conducting an inquiry, the absence of dashcam footage, bodycam footage, and Walmart surveillance video leaves a gaping hole in understanding the sequence of events. Civil rights attorney Ben Crump has been a vocal advocate for the release of this evidence, emphasizing that the pathologist’s findings, while informative, were based on incomplete information. The family and their legal team are insistent that these videos are crucial for solving the “puzzle” of what truly transpired that day, suggesting a deliberate withholding of information that could shed light on the officers’ actions.
The official autopsy report is not yet complete, according to the Tate County Coroner. This ongoing delay in official findings, coupled with the silence from the Mississippi Bureau of Investigation, the entity overseeing the inquiry, only amplifies public suspicion. The Senatobia Police Chief and a Walmart spokesperson have also been contacted for comment, but at this stage, a comprehensive, officially released statement detailing the incident is still forthcoming. This lack of immediate, transparent communication has become a hallmark of such tragic events, leading many to question the motivations behind the silence, often suspecting an attempt to construct a narrative that shields the officers involved.
The initial account provided by state investigators stated that officers attempted to stop the vehicle, but the driver allegedly drove towards them, almost striking one, which then prompted the officer to discharge their weapon. This narrative is precisely what the preliminary autopsy findings and the mother’s account challenge. She asserts that her friend, who was driving, was moving away from the officers. The shattered passenger-side window and the apparent bullet hole on the passenger side of the windshield, as displayed alongside photos and diagrams of Kohen’s body, further corroborate the notion that the car was not directly in the path of the officers.
The disconnect between the official narrative and the emerging evidence is profound. Questions arise about the definition of “danger” in this context. If a car is moving away, even if in the general direction of an officer, does it inherently constitute a threat warranting lethal force, especially when a child is present? The argument that a car, at low speeds, could be a deadly weapon is often used in defense of police shootings, but it raises concerns about the standard of force applied. The involvement of a potentially minor offense like shoplifting, as the trigger for such a violent response, is met with incredulity and anger by many observers, who question the prioritization of property over human life.
There’s a palpable sense of frustration and resignation among many who feel that, in the American justice system, officers involved in fatal shootings often receive preferential treatment. The concept of qualified immunity is frequently invoked as a barrier to accountability, leading to the grim prediction that the officer involved will likely face no criminal repercussions. The community’s demand for transparency extends to the release of all potential evidence, not just what the authorities deem relevant, to ensure a fair and thorough investigation. The delay in providing this evidence fuels a narrative of defensiveness and a potential cover-up, making it difficult for the public to trust the ongoing process.
The emotional toll on the family and the community is immense. Witnessing the display of photos and diagrams of Kohen’s body at a church service, alongside signs demanding justice, underscores the depth of grief and the urgent need for answers. The comparisons drawn to other high-profile cases of Black individuals killed by police, such as George Floyd, highlight a systemic issue that many believe is deeply rooted in racial bias and a pattern of excessive force. The hope is that, by releasing the video evidence and allowing an independent, transparent investigation, the truth will surface, and justice, however delayed, will ultimately prevail for Baby Kohen. The ultimate resolution will depend on the willingness of authorities to release all pertinent information and to hold individuals accountable for their actions, regardless of their profession.