By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The article critiques JD Vance’s new book, *Communion*, arguing it reveals his deep-seated cynicism and ambition, a stark contrast to his earlier, more authentic persona. It suggests Vance’s fervent loyalty to Donald Trump, even to the point of defending controversial policies like the Iran deal, stems from a desire to ascend within the political elite, mirroring his past ambition to join the Ivy League. Despite his spiritual journey, Vance appears to prioritize political advancement over genuine character, displaying a remarkable lack of self-awareness in his pursuit of power.
Read the original article here
JD Vance’s memoir, *Communion*, seems to offer a compelling, if self-incriminating, explanation for why Donald Trump might hold him in such low regard. The narrative within the book, as interpreted, paints a picture of a politician driven by an almost desperate ambition, a trait that Trump himself embodies and, perhaps, despises in others when it’s not his own. Vance’s journey from a vocal critic of Trump, famously calling him “America’s Hitler,” to a staunch defender and potential successor, reads less like a genuine evolution of thought and more like a calculated maneuver for power. This stark contrast, highlighted by his own introspection about a “craving for conquest” and a prioritization of “striving over character,” likely does not escape Trump’s notice, a man who thrives on loyalty and, crucially, on being the sole architect of his own narrative.
The memoir’s exploration of Vance’s spiritual awakening, his conversion to Catholicism, is presented in a way that, for Trump, might appear hypocritical when juxtaposed with his fervent devotion to a secular leader who demands adoration. Trump, notoriously, despises perceived flip-flopping unless it serves his own agenda, and Vance’s ideological gymnastics to align with Trump’s platform, even on issues he previously opposed, would likely be seen by Trump as a sign of weakness rather than strategic brilliance. The book’s introspective passages, where Vance admits to being “desperate to make it” and overly focused on “winning the game of life,” reveal a deep-seated ambition that Trump might interpret as a direct threat or, at best, a pathetic attempt to mimic his own success.
Furthermore, Vance’s description of observing a billionaire at an Oscars party, feeling like the “awkward kid laughing too hard at the popular kid’s jokes,” eerily mirrors the dynamic Trump often cultivates. For Trump to read that Vance, now a political insider, still harbors these feelings of being an outsider looking in, even when occupying a position of power, would likely confirm his suspicions about Vance’s inherent lack of genuine confidence and his desperate need for validation. Trump, who meticulously crafts an image of unparalleled success and effortless command, would likely find this self-awareness of awkwardness, even in his own orbit, to be a stark reminder that Vance is not a natural peer but rather someone perpetually striving for acceptance, a trait Trump can exploit but rarely respect.
The narrative of Vance’s past as a vocal Trump critic, coupled with his subsequent pivot to becoming a vocal supporter, is the most glaring indication of why Trump might hold him in such contempt. Trump is known for his unforgiving memory of perceived slights and his deep distrust of those who have publicly opposed him. Vance’s memoir, by chronicling this transformation, essentially serves as a confession of his past criticisms and a stark illustration of his willingness to abandon prior convictions for political gain. This, in Trump’s transactional view of relationships, signifies a lack of genuine principle and a susceptibility to being molded, qualities that might earn Vance a position but not his respect.
Vance’s own words within the memoir, detailing his ambition to escape his background and ascend to elite circles, like Yale Law School, reveal a deeply ingrained desire for upward mobility and a relentless pursuit of success. This ambition, while perhaps understandable, likely strikes Trump as a mirror of his own, but without the perceived originality or inherent superiority he believes he possesses. Trump’s ego is such that he sees himself as a singular entity, and anyone who appears to be actively imitating his path or strategically maneuvering for a similar level of influence is likely to be viewed with suspicion and a degree of disdain.
The memoir’s portrayal of Vance as a schemer, someone willing to “say and do anything” to achieve his goals, aligns with Trump’s own Machiavellian approach to politics. However, Trump likely believes he is the master strategist and any perceived imitation of his methods, especially by someone he views as less intellectually formidable, would be met with scorn. The book, by detailing Vance’s self-admitted cynicism and ambition, essentially offers a roadmap of how he achieved his current position, a position Trump might see as a mere stepping stone, not an earned achievement. This perceived opportunism, documented by Vance himself, would solidify Trump’s likely view of him as a lightweight, a sycophant whose loyalty is transactional and whose ambition is a pale imitation of the real thing.
Moreover, Trump’s tendency to surround himself with individuals who are not perceived as threats to his own dominance is well-documented. Vance, despite his current position as Vice President, is presented in his memoir as someone who was once an outsider, desperate to be accepted by the “cool kids.” This inherent insecurity, even when amplified by power, is unlikely to garner respect from Trump. Trump, who thrives on the adulation of his supporters and views himself as the ultimate authority figure, would likely see Vance’s documented past struggles for acceptance as evidence of his weakness and his enduring need for external validation, qualities that make him easily manipulable but not worthy of genuine esteem.
Ultimately, Vance’s memoir appears to reveal not a hidden secret, but a clear, self-authored testament to his own ambition and his willingness to adapt his principles to achieve power. For a figure like Donald Trump, who prizes his own singular status and views loyalty as a tool rather than a virtue, this detailed account of Vance’s strategic maneuvering and past criticisms likely confirms his existing low opinion. The book, in essence, provides an internal narrative that validates Trump’s potential perception of Vance as a calculating, opportunistic individual whose primary motivation is personal advancement, a characteristic Trump might recognize all too well, but only in himself.