By John Q. Hosedrinker 
As part of a leadership shake-up, Tulsi Gabbard’s father, Mike Gabbard, was dismissed from his role overseeing guru Chris Butler’s personal affairs due to lapses, including failing to secure fresh mangoes for breakfast. This event, along with extensive documentation provided by a former disillusioned disciple, suggests Butler wielded significant influence over Gabbard’s public career. Memos reveal Butler allegedly provided directives on legislation, policy, and public statements, even offering harsh criticism of Gabbard’s performance. Gabbard’s public statements and legislative actions often mirrored the guidance found in these documents, raising concerns about the extent of Butler’s control over her political trajectory.
Read the original article here
The question of whether Tulsi Gabbard has been the puppet of an alt-right religious guru throughout her entire political career is one that has circulated for years, with many believing the answer to be a resounding “yes.” This sentiment isn’t new; it seems to have been a lingering suspicion for a significant portion of the public and observers of politics, even before she threw her hat into the presidential ring. The narrative suggests that her political journey, from her early days to her more recent public persona, has been shaped by a specific ideological and possibly cultish influence.
Digging into this, the core of the concern seems to stem from her alleged association with Chris Butler and his organization, the Science of Identity Foundation. This group is often described as a cult, and the idea is that Butler, the guru figure, may have orchestrated Gabbard’s political rise, guiding her decisions and public stances to align with his own agenda. The input suggests that this influence began early, with her reportedly being “groomed for politics from a young age by a cult.” This foundational aspect is crucial to understanding the “entire political career” part of the question.
The alleged motivations behind this alleged puppetry are varied. Some theories posit that Gabbard’s isolationist views, purportedly instilled by Butler’s anti-establishment teachings, naturally align with or benefit certain foreign geopolitical goals, particularly those of Russia. This leads to the accusation that she may be a “useful idiot” for foreign powers, whether intentionally or not. In Russia, the perception seems to be even more direct, with journalists reportedly referring to her as “our friend,” implying a level of complicity or perceived alignment that goes beyond mere coincidence.
This perspective often colors the interpretation of her policy positions and public appearances. For instance, her alignment with the Trump administration, particularly after her presidential run, is seen by some as a clear indicator of her lack of morals or integrity, especially given the broader context of alleged foreign influence. The question is raised: why else would an “otherwise intelligent woman” align herself with a “hateful, bigoted administration”? The implication is that a significant “trade” or concession is being made, potentially for personal gain or as part of a larger, orchestrated plan.
Furthermore, there’s a persistent notion that this alleged cult influence explains her more contrarian or unexpected political stances. Her shift towards what some perceive as “grifting Republicans” is seen not as a genuine ideological change, but as a further manifestation of her being directed by external forces. The comparison is made to the broader Republican party, where some commentators suggest that “every Republican leader is some kind of freak,” living in a “miasma of lies” and supporting figures who are described with strong negative terms. This suggests a systemic issue, where figures like Gabbard are seen as symptoms of a larger problem within the right-wing political landscape.
The timing of public awareness is also a point of discussion. Many feel that this has been “known for years,” and that the mainstream media is only now “catching on.” The QAA podcast and “Behind the Bastards” are mentioned as sources that have been discussing these theories for a considerable time. This suggests a disconnect between those who have been following these narratives and the broader public perception, which may have been slower to grasp the extent of the alleged influence.
The question of whether she was initially steered to run as a Democrat by this guru is also brought up, implying that her party affiliations might also have been a strategic maneuver dictated by her alleged puppet masters. The desire for concrete explanations is evident, with some users explicitly asking for details about the cult, its beliefs, and its motivations, beyond just the general accusations.
Even amidst the serious allegations, there are moments of almost surreal observation. One anecdote vividly describes a clandestine meeting with Gabbard, where a bomb threat led to a hasty departure on a private plane, highlighting the perceived strangeness and potential danger surrounding her associates and activities. This personal account, while anecdotal, adds to the mystique and reinforces the idea that her political life might be intertwined with unconventional and concerning circles.
Ultimately, the consensus within the provided content leans heavily towards an affirmative answer. The language used – “charlatan,” “massive piece of shit,” “sold our national security off,” “phony,” “compromised” – paints a picture of deep distrust and a firm belief that Gabbard’s political career has been anything but independent. The recurring theme is that her actions and affiliations, while sometimes appearing puzzling to the uninitiated, have been consistent with a long-standing, orchestrated influence, suggesting that the idea of her being a “weird little puppet of an alt-right religious guru” is not a new conspiracy theory but a long-held suspicion that many believe has finally been illuminated. The question itself, for many, is almost rhetorical, as the answer seems self-evident based on years of perceived patterns and alleged associations.