By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump’s approval ratings have plummeted to historic lows, with a net approval of negative 50 points on inflation and 80 percent disapproval on gas prices. This marks the first time Democrats have held an advantage on inflation since the 1970s. Sources suggest Trump’s frustration with media coverage of his Iran bombing actions is linked to these economic concerns, as his inability to resolve issues like the Strait of Hormuz is contributing to cost increases that are negatively impacting his standing and Republican midterm prospects. Democratic strategists view these challenges as creating potential pickup opportunities in unexpected districts, with current polling indicating a significant Democratic lead in the generic House matchup.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump’s approval ratings have reportedly hit a concerning new low, a development that has apparently left him in a state of considerable fury. Reports suggest that in various polls, his net approval on inflation has dipped to a staggering negative 50 points, a figure described as unprecedented in presidential history. Furthermore, his disapproval rating concerning gas prices stands at a stark 80 percent. This economic sentiment is particularly noteworthy as it marks the first time since the 1970s that Democrats have held an advantage over Republicans on the issue of inflation.
This sharp decline in public opinion seems to be directly linked to recent geopolitical events and their perceived mishandling. Sources close to Trump indicate that he is “furious” because the media has not portrayed his recent actions regarding Iran as strength and power. The implication is that his administration’s efforts to influence Iran’s actions, specifically regarding the Strait of Hormuz, have been unsuccessful, leading to rising costs that are now negatively impacting his approval and the Republican Party’s prospects in upcoming elections.
The narrative emerging is one of cause and effect: a perceived failure in foreign policy directly contributing to domestic economic woes, which in turn are eroding public support. The upcoming midterm elections are seen as a potential barometer for whether these travails will translate into a significant rout for the Republican party.
This situation prompts reflection on the nature of Trump’s perpetual state of agitation. Despite possessing considerable wealth and power, he seems to be characterized by a persistent unhappiness. The constant stream of “low poll” headlines can be overwhelming, and some observers question their reliability as a true measure of public sentiment, suggesting that the dynamics of political polling may have shifted.
There’s a prevailing sentiment that if Trump were truly concerned with popularity, he would pivot to more broadly appealing policies. Instead, his focus appears to be elsewhere, leading to outcomes that are widely perceived as detrimental. The idea of him simply doing “popular things” seems to be overshadowed by a perceived inclination towards actions viewed as criminal or malicious.
Many are weary of incremental polling shifts, expressing a desire for a more definitive downturn. The anger and frustration expressed by some stem from a belief that Trump has mismanaged the country, leading to widespread hardship. The notion of him escaping consequences, potentially with ill-gotten gains, is a recurring theme. The depth of fury directed towards him by some surpasses any personal anger he might be experiencing.
The historical context is also brought up, referencing post-WWII Germany where a significant portion of the population still supported Nazism, suggesting that a segment of the population will invariably support hateful ideologies. The current low poll numbers are seen by some as a positive development, a sign that his influence might be waning.
Concerns are also raised about his physical appearance, with comments about swollen eyes, hinting at underlying stress or health issues. However, it’s pointed out that Trump has openly stated he doesn’t prioritize the financial well-being of Americans and, in fact, expresses a liking for inflation. This suggests that his personal popularity might not be his primary driver, especially when his actions seem to contradict efforts to improve it.
The ultimate impact of these low poll numbers remains a subject of debate. Some argue that until he is out of office or demonstrably defeated, these polls can be misleading, potentially offering false reassurance to Democratic voters. The urgency of the upcoming elections is emphasized, with the argument that an overwhelming margin of victory is necessary to counter what is perceived as a concerted effort by Trump and his allies to rig elections, thereby undermining democracy. The fear is that another two years of Republican control could permanently alter the landscape of American democracy.
There’s a degree of irony perceived in the outcome of policies designed to increase expenses. The idea that campaigning on making things more expensive and then proceeding to do just that would negatively impact poll numbers is seen as an almost predictable consequence, yet somehow not fully grasped. Some believe his approval should be significantly lower, expressing bewilderment at the number of people who still support him.
The perspective that Trump views negative coverage as a liberal media conspiracy, despite his actions that are seen as undermining the Constitution, initiating questionable wars, and damaging the global economy, is prevalent. His privileged upbringing is contrasted with a perceived lack of genuine happiness or connection in his life, leading to a sense of his perpetual misery.
There’s a weariness with recurring headlines that portray Trump as constantly furious, breaking down, or having meltdowns, as these do not seem to lead to any tangible consequences. The enduring support he commands from a significant portion of the Republican base is seen as a crucial factor that allows him to maintain his influence, regardless of broader public opinion. While these low polls might impact the midterms, his hold on the Republican party may ensure continued loyalty from Congress.
The frustration with his constant state of rage, particularly concerning the 2020 election results, is palpable. The idea of him being “furious” seems to be a constant in political discourse, and some wonder if he is capable of experiencing anything else. The suggestion of him taking up a calming hobby like knitting is offered with a hint of sarcasm.
The question of why Republican politicians remain so beholden to him, even as his poll numbers decline, is raised. While his influence as a “kingmaker” was once tied to survival, the current dynamic is attributed to financial incentives, a consistent theme in criticisms of the party’s alignment with him. The hope is that his fury and elevated blood pressure will continue to rise.
Amidst the political commentary, there are moments of levity and focus on simpler pleasures, like the enjoyment of eggs. However, the underlying political concerns remain, including the way polls are phrased to elicit specific responses, often by presenting polarized choices that frame complex issues in a binary, politically charged manner. This manipulative polling technique is seen as a way to skew results and influence voter perception.
The question of whether Trump’s fury makes his blood pressure rise is posed, highlighting a detached curiosity about his well-being. The sentiment that his anger is irrelevant, given his perceived narcissistic personality and consistent losses, is also expressed. He is likened to a character who craves universal approval and love, suggesting a deeply ingrained need for validation.
The idea of voting for him to resign is floated as a potential, albeit unlikely, scenario. The repetition of headlines about his anger and distress, without any apparent impact, leads to a feeling of exhaustion. The enduring strength of his support within the Republican base is seen as the key factor that allows him to maintain his power, regardless of his standing in broader polls.
There is a call to action to defeat those who support and enable him, framing the upcoming election as a critical moment to prevent further erosion of democracy. The focus remains on the consequences of his actions and the perceived damage to the country’s future.