By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Steak ‘n Shake has confidently declared its 100% accuracy in political predictions following the victory of the Republican candidate it endorsed for Iowa governor, who defeated a challenger backed by President Trump. The restaurant chain supported businessman Zach Lahn, aligning with the “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) initiative, which emphasizes a move away from toxic chemicals. Lahn’s narrow win in the GOP primary marks a significant statewide primary endorsement loss for Trump, with Steak ‘n Shake celebrating their undefeated record in political endorsements. This alignment with the MAHA agenda extends to the restaurant’s recent operational changes, including a shift to 100% grass-fed beef and other “real food” ingredients.
Read the original article here
It seems Steak ‘n Shake is making a bit of a splash, or perhaps a ripple, in the political arena, albeit in a rather peculiar way. After a candidate endorsed by Donald Trump didn’t quite hit the mark in Iowa, the restaurant chain confidently declared they “remain undefeated in political endorsements.” This statement, posted on social media platform X, drew a parallel between their supposed political prowess and their commitment to serving “100% grass-fed Steakburgers and 100% beef tallow fries,” asserting they “like getting it right.”
The company’s messaging appears to suggest a strong alignment with certain political ideologies, specifically linking themselves to the use of beef tallow in their fries and chicken. This choice, while a culinary one, has become intertwined with a particular political movement. It’s fascinating how a fast-food chain can translate its menu choices into a statement of political conviction, especially when the outcome of the election in question didn’t go as planned for their chosen candidate.
This “undefeated” claim comes with a distinct flavor of irony, given the electoral result. It’s as if Steak ‘n Shake is trying to position themselves as more astute in their political predictions than the political strategists themselves. The comparison to their food preparation methods – “100% in political predictions” as they are “serving 100% grass-fed Steakburgers and 100% beef tallow fries” – is quite a statement. It implies a level of accuracy and certainty in their endorsements that is, shall we say, bold.
The choice to associate with specific political figures and stances has certainly generated a reaction. For some, this affiliation is a direct reason to boycott the establishment, viewing it as an endorsement of policies or individuals they strongly oppose. The mention of “MAHA” and “RFK Jr.” in the context of the restaurant’s stance suggests a leaning towards a specific political spectrum, which, for many, raises concerns about the undermining of established medical practices.
There’s a palpable sense of disappointment and perhaps even a touch of nostalgia from those who recall Steak ‘n Shake being a different kind of place in the past. Memories of what was once an “awesome” experience now contrast sharply with current perceptions of the restaurant as a “sad dystopian shit-tastic nightmare.” This shift in perception extends to the food itself, with comments about declining quality and significantly increased prices, even for simple items like chicken strips. The milkshake quality also seems to have taken a hit, further fueling the discontent.
The idea of a fast-food chain making definitive political endorsements, especially when those endorsements don’t lead to electoral success, is viewed by many as somewhat absurd. The implication that Steak ‘n Shake is now a proponent of a particular political stance, even to the point of being labeled “MAGA,” has led to a reassessment of patronizing the chain. For some, the political alignment is so significant that it overrides any past positive associations with the brand.
The debate around beef tallow versus seed oils also enters the picture, highlighting how culinary trends can become entangled with political discourse. While Steak ‘n Shake touts its beef tallow fries as a superior choice, some critics point to the scientific evidence regarding heart disease, suggesting that this preference aligns with a mindset that prioritizes short-term enjoyment over long-term health. This connection further solidifies the perception of a specific political alignment.
The decline in the quality of food and service, coupled with the increasing prices, seems to be a recurring theme among those who express their disillusionment. The experience of visiting a Steak ‘n Shake nowadays is often described as underwhelming, with slow service and food that is considered merely “passable” at best. This decline in the core offering of the restaurant makes the bold political statements even more jarring for some.
Ultimately, Steak ‘n Shake’s declaration of being “undefeated in political endorsements” after a Trump-backed candidate’s loss in Iowa has served as a catalyst for many to re-evaluate their relationship with the brand. For some, it’s a clear signal to stay away, while for others, it’s a confusing turn of events that tarnishes a once-fond memory of a restaurant chain. The intersection of fast food and political endorsements has, it appears, created a rather savory recipe for controversy.