By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite efforts by the Interior Department to combat a growing algae problem using hydrogen peroxide and nanobubble ozone technology, the chosen treatment has proven ineffective. The 12 percent hydrogen peroxide concentrate, identified as the cause of the issue, not only failed to eliminate the algae but has also caused the pool’s paint to peel and significantly elevated phosphate levels. These unintended consequences have drawn negative attention to the project, which is now expected to appear worse by the time of the America250 celebration.
Read the original article here
The Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, after a $14 million renovation, is now facing a growing disaster, with reports of exploding algae blooms and peeling paint adding to the woes. This situation has understandably left many surprised and questioning the efficacy of the extensive work undertaken.
The issues began to surface with an alarming explosion of algae, transforming the once pristine waters into an unpleasant “Iranian Revolution Green.” This visual degradation, a stark contrast to its intended “American Flag Blue,” has become a potent symbol for many, reflecting broader criticisms.
Adding to the visual blight, the paint on the pool’s surfaces has started to peel significantly. This peeling paint suggests a fundamental problem with the renovation itself, raising questions about the materials used and the quality of the application.
The use of hydrogen peroxide in a desperate attempt to combat the algae has been identified as a potential culprit for the paint’s deterioration. While intended as a solution for the plant overgrowth, it’s now understood that hydrogen peroxide is also a paint remover, creating a double problem for the project.
For those with experience in construction and renovation, the current state of the reflecting pool is not entirely surprising. The challenges of paint removal, which are often more time-consuming and expensive than application, are well-known within the industry. This suggests a potential oversight or lack of foresight in the renovation planning and execution.
A prevailing sentiment is that the entire undertaking is emblematic of a “typical Trump disaster.” This perception stems from a belief that projects associated with the former administration often suffer from mismanagement, cronyism, and ultimately, failure, regardless of the initial investment.
Some have pointed to the possibility of no-bid contracts being awarded to individuals or companies with close ties to the former administration. This practice, they argue, could have led to substandard work and inflated costs, a pattern they believe is repeated in this instance.
The sheer cost of the renovation, $14 million, has become a significant point of contention, especially given the current state of disrepair. Many believe this substantial sum could have been allocated to more pressing needs or that a far better outcome should have been achieved for that price.
The situation has also raised concerns about the long-term viability of the reflecting pool. There’s a worry that the damage might be so extensive that even a competent administration might struggle to restore it without a complete and costly rebuild.
The current predicament is seen by some as a perfect, albeit unfortunate, metaphor for the perceived failures of a specific administration. The initial problem, the attempt to fix it with an inappropriate solution, and the resulting worsening of the situation, all contribute to this symbolic interpretation.
There’s a strong feeling of disappointment and frustration among those who believe the renovation was unnecessary in the first place, given the pool was not perceived to be in significant disrepair. The expenditure of such a large sum on a project with such a poor outcome is deeply concerning.
The idea of awarding another no-bid contract to a hastily assembled company, potentially linked to the former president’s family, has been suggested as a darkly ironic, albeit unwanted, next step. This scenario highlights the deep-seated distrust in the processes and outcomes associated with certain political figures.
The financial implications of such projects, particularly when they result in failure, are not lost on observers. The “cost of corruption” is a phrase that emerges, suggesting that taxpayer money is being squandered through unethical practices.
The lack of accountability for the project’s failures is another common theme. Many feel that without proper oversight and consequences, such disasters are likely to be repeated.
The possibility of a deliberate plot to undermine a particular administration has been raised, though this is often framed with a degree of sarcasm, acknowledging that incompetence itself might be the more plausible explanation.
The discussion also touches upon alternative, potentially more cost-effective, and scientifically sound solutions for algae control. The suggestion of using citric acid, a readily available and relatively inexpensive algaecide, further amplifies the perception of poor decision-making.
The comparison to other high-profile, poorly executed projects further solidifies the narrative of a pattern of failure. The “Four Seasons Total Landscaping” incident, for example, serves as a cultural touchstone for perceived incompetence and absurdity.
Ultimately, the disaster at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, following a $14 million renovation, has become more than just a story about a failing public works project. For many, it’s a symbol of perceived mismanagement, wasted resources, and a broader disillusionment with political processes and outcomes.