By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A significant oil refinery located south of Moscow is anticipated to be out of commission for a minimum of six months. This extended shutdown follows multiple Ukrainian drone attacks that reportedly damaged key processing units responsible for the facility’s entire capacity. Industry sources indicate that repairs to the damaged distillation and Euro+ units, which together processed 11.6 million metric tons of oil this year, will take at least half a year.
Read the original article here
It appears that the Moscow Oil Refinery, a significant asset for Russia, is facing a prolonged period of inactivity, with projections suggesting production might not resume until as late as 2027, according to Reuters. This extended shutdown is a direct consequence of a recent explosion that has taken the facility offline for at least six months, a substantial blow to Russia’s oil processing capabilities.
The impact of this outage is expected to be far-reaching, creating considerable problems for Russia’s economy and its ability to finance its ongoing military operations. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that Ukraine has demonstrated a capability to target other refineries in Russia, thereby increasing the pressure and financial strain on Moscow. This strategic approach by Ukraine aims to disrupt Russia’s revenue streams, making the cost of maintaining the war increasingly untenable.
The effectiveness of Ukraine’s strategy is highlighted by the fact that they appear to be targeting components of these refineries that are particularly difficult to repair or replace. This focused approach allows Ukraine to achieve significant production shutdowns or reductions with what is described as “a lot of bang for their buck.” The hope from some observers is that these strikes will continue, potentially pushing the timeline for any repairs even further, perhaps into 2030 or beyond.
Interestingly, the concentrated air defenses in Moscow seem to have been insufficient to protect this vital refinery, highlighting a significant vulnerability. This failure to safeguard such a critical national asset is being viewed as a major misstep, a “fuck up” that will only worsen as the situation develops. The phrase “Burn baby burn!” seems to capture the sentiment of those who see this as a positive development for Ukraine and a negative one for Russia.
Furthermore, the possibility of additional strikes on the same refinery’s infrastructure during the repair process is a real concern. This makes it likely that the timeline for resuming production will be extended significantly. Ukraine’s demonstrated ability to return and strike at will means that any prediction of a return to normalcy for the refinery is inherently premature, as it could remain out of commission indefinitely if Ukraine chooses to continue its targeted attacks.
The effectiveness and precision of Ukrainian drones in these operations are noteworthy. The fact that the Moscow refinery is located a mere 15 kilometers from the Kremlin also serves as a potent warning to President Putin, underscoring Ukraine’s capacity to strike at targets within close proximity to the heart of Russian power at any moment.
The notion of “missing oil from the rains” is a humorous, albeit grim, acknowledgment of the disruption. The expectation is that the moment the refinery is slated to go back online, it will likely face another “visitor” from Ukraine, effectively keeping it in a perpetual state of disruption. Explosions, by their very nature, tend to cause lasting damage, and this incident is no exception.
There’s a certain defiant spirit expressed in the sentiment that Moscow Oil Refinery will only resume production “When I Fucking Say So!!! – Volodymyr Zelenskyy.” While understandable in its context of conflict, this highlights the power imbalance and the direct impact of Ukraine’s actions on Russian infrastructure. The question naturally arises regarding the potential impact on energy prices in the European Union, a concern that may lead to increased consideration of alternative energy sources like nuclear power.
The idea that “poking the bear” could lead to an all-out response is a recurring theme in discussions about geopolitical conflicts. However, in this specific instance, the focus is on Russia’s inability to protect its own strategic assets despite its formidable military presence. There have also been speculative whispers of an “inside job,” suggesting that internal factors might have contributed to the incident, though the prevailing narrative points to successful Ukrainian drone operations.
The question of whether the refinery will ever resume production is being raised, especially considering the limited resources available for repairs and Ukraine’s capacity to strike again before work is completed. A point of discussion is whether the damaged components were truly critical. While some argue that tanks and cisterns are often replaceable, the overall impact on production capacity and the complexity of modern refineries suggest that even seemingly less critical parts can have a significant domino effect.
Given that Russia’s primary exports consist of oil and basic weaponry, and considering China’s potential to capitalize on a weakened Russia, the continued disruption of oil production could have significant geopolitical and economic ramifications. This situation will likely increase Putin’s paranoia about further targets within Russia’s borders, especially if Ukraine can continue to take more refineries offline for extended periods. It’s worth noting that Ukraine has already targeted numerous Russian refineries, many of them on multiple occasions.
The idea of an “Oil Refinery Bingo Card” being filled up speaks to the sheer volume of successful strikes Ukraine has achieved against these vital Russian facilities. The method of these long-range drone attacks launched from Ukraine is straightforward, although some have speculated about the potential for insider information or intelligence provided by allies like the CIA aiding in identifying the most valuable areas to target within the refineries. The argument that the layout of a refinery is not a state secret also supports the feasibility of such strikes.
The assertion that Ukraine has been consistently hitting Russian oil refineries for a considerable time is accurate, and this latest incident is simply another in a series of successful attacks resulting directly from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. These operations are unequivocally attributed as Ukraine’s achievements. The repeated cycle of repairs followed by further strikes is a concerning prospect, leading to the idea that the refinery might be perpetually caught in this destructive loop.
The theory of an “inside job” persists for some, fueled by the idea that Russia might have somehow mistakenly targeted its own refinery with a missile. However, the overwhelming evidence and analysis point towards a well-executed and sustained campaign by Ukraine utilizing long-range drone technology to cripple Russia’s oil processing capabilities.