By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Previously unreleased handwritten notes reveal Jeffrey Epstein’s last-ditch efforts in jail to offer information to federal prosecutors regarding Donald Trump, suggesting “Trump is a total con artist.” These notes, scribbled on legal pads, also mentioned former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg and questioned Trump’s intellect. While Epstein’s writings did not appear to introduce new allegations, they reflected his desperation and potential attempts to secure leniency before his 2019 suicide, as investigations into powerful individuals connected to him continued.
Read the original article here
New insights emerging from Jeffrey Epstein’s affairs paint a startling picture of his final days, suggesting he attempted to leverage damaging information about Donald Trump in a bid for leniency after his arrest. Notes scribbled by Epstein himself reportedly reveal his intention to offer “dirt” on Trump, whom he characterized as a “con artist,” and even noted that Trump was “not a stable genius.” This eleventh-hour effort to secure a more favorable outcome for himself indicates a desperate attempt to bargain his way out of the serious charges he faced.
The implication that Epstein possessed compromising information on Trump, and was willing to reveal it, raises significant questions about the nature of their past association. It appears Epstein saw this as his ultimate bargaining chip, a way to extort a deal from authorities by offering to implicate a prominent public figure. The scribbled phrase, “not a stable genius,” is particularly noteworthy, potentially a direct response to Trump’s own self-proclaimed moniker. This suggests a level of animosity or perhaps a calculated assessment by Epstein of Trump’s character and vulnerabilities.
The timing of these revelations, unearthed from Epstein’s personal writings, comes as the justice department under Bill Barr sought to close the case. The narrative suggests that as soon as Epstein was arrested, Trump himself made a similar move, attempting to use any leverage he might have had over Epstein. This creates a chilling dynamic where both men, at different points, appear to have sought to use the other as a shield or a weapon. The idea that they were “partners in crime” is a sentiment echoed, and the possibility that they were each trying to make the other their “fall guy” is a powerful undercurrent in these discoveries.
Further complicating the situation is the suspicious manner of Epstein’s death shortly after his arrest, occurring under circumstances where surveillance systems were reportedly malfunctioning and guards were absent. This event, coupled with the new information about Epstein’s intent to implicate Trump, fuels speculation that his death may have been more than a suicide, especially considering the potential for him to have revealed damaging secrets about powerful individuals. The involvement of Bill Barr and his family’s historical connection to Epstein, including Barr’s father’s role in his early career and Barr’s own alleged actions concerning Epstein’s raided home, only adds layers of intrigue and suspicion.
The alleged offer to provide information on Trump, particularly if it involved sensitive or illegal activities, would have been a significant development. The fact that Epstein seemingly intended to press for investigations into Trump as part of his plea for leniency highlights the severity of the charges against him and his willingness to go to extreme lengths to avoid them. The notion that “one of the worst humans in the world” could potentially blackmail a figure like Trump underscores the immense power such individuals can wield through the acquisition and threatened release of damaging information.
The unearthed notes also hint at the deep entanglements between Epstein and powerful figures, including those in politics and business. The suggestion that Epstein’s activities, such as facilitating money laundering, would have been known to associates like Trump, makes the idea of blackmail or mutual compromise entirely plausible. The repeated mentions of Trump’s past dealings with Epstein, including his ownership of beauty pageants, which Epstein was known to patronize, create a pattern of association that now appears even more suspect.
Ultimately, these newly revealed notes suggest a desperate man, Jeffrey Epstein, attempting to use his knowledge of Donald Trump’s alleged misdeeds as a lifeline. The phrase “not a stable genius” attributed to Epstein’s notes stands as a stark and potentially damning assessment of Trump, offered at a moment when Epstein was facing the full force of the law. The events surrounding Epstein’s arrest, his subsequent death, and these late-stage revelations create a complex web of suspicion, implicating not only Epstein but also raising profound questions about the extent of his influence and the powerful individuals he may have sought to expose or exploit. The continued calls to release all pertinent files underscore the public’s desire for transparency and a complete understanding of the truth behind these dark associations.