By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime assistant, Lesley Groff, disclosed during a closed-door committee interview that she arranged several phone calls between Epstein and Donald Trump prior to Trump’s presidency. Groff, who worked for Epstein for approximately 18 years, stated that while the calls were infrequent, they did occur. Groff also sought to distance herself from Epstein’s criminal activities, describing him as a “monster” and a “master manipulator.” Despite her claims of ignorance regarding Epstein’s abuses, some panel members and survivors expressed skepticism about her assertions.
Read the original article here
A former assistant to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein has reportedly stated that she personally arranged multiple phone calls between Epstein and Donald Trump in the years leading up to Trump’s presidency. Lesley Groff, who was employed by Epstein for approximately 18 years starting in 2001, apparently shared this information during a closed-door interview with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee as part of their ongoing investigation into Epstein’s activities.
The disclosure centers on Groff’s role in facilitating communication between Epstein, a convicted sex offender, and Donald Trump. This detail emerges from a recent interview where Groff, seeking to distance herself from Epstein’s criminal actions, described him as a “monster” and stated she was never privy to his true nature despite working for him for nearly two decades.
The implication of these alleged phone calls suggests a level of interaction between Trump and Epstein that goes beyond casual acquaintance, given that Groff was tasked with setting them up. This comes as various investigations and public interest continue to surround Epstein and his associates, with many eagerly awaiting the release of further documents and information.
Questions are naturally arising about the extent of Trump’s awareness and involvement with Epstein, especially in light of Groff’s specific role in arranging communications. While Trump has previously stated he had limited knowledge of Epstein, this new information, if substantiated, adds another layer of complexity to the narrative.
The nature of these calls and the topics discussed remain unaddressed, leaving room for speculation. However, the fact that an assistant would be specifically tasked with facilitating calls between the two prominent figures indicates a deliberate effort to connect them.
The ongoing investigation aims to uncover the full scope of Epstein’s network and the individuals he interacted with. Groff’s testimony, therefore, is seen by some as a crucial piece of the puzzle, potentially shedding light on established relationships and interactions that were previously unknown or downplayed.
Many are now calling for a thorough examination of these alleged communications and for further transparency regarding the content of these calls and their potential implications. The hope is that all relevant information will be brought to light to provide a clearer understanding of the relationships and activities that transpired.