By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The decision to sever institutional ties between Burkina Faso and France concerns only the framework of their relationship, not the deep historical, human, cultural, and social connections that bind the two peoples. This move is exclusively an institutional one, and does not affect the existing strong bonds between Burkinabe and French citizens.
Read the original article here
The recent decision by Burkina Faso to sever diplomatic ties with France marks a significant geopolitical shift, raising many questions about the nation’s future trajectory and its complex relationship with its former colonial power. This move, while perhaps surprising to some given the historical context, appears to be the culmination of growing frustrations and a desire for a new direction. It’s a situation that echoes similar developments in other former French colonies that have also sought to distance themselves from France, often following periods of internal coups and shifts in alliances.
The narrative surrounding this decision often points to a sense of disillusionment with France’s continued influence and perceived ineffectiveness in addressing critical security challenges. There’s a strong sentiment that while France may have offered assistance in counterterrorism efforts, this support was ultimately insufficient or perhaps even counterproductive in the eyes of many Burkinabè. This perception has fueled a narrative that places blame squarely on the French, which, in turn, garnishes a degree of domestic support for the current leadership.
Indeed, the security situation in Burkina Faso is dire, with a significant portion of the country reportedly under the control of Islamic extremist groups. This alarming reality paints a stark picture of the challenges facing the government. The departure of French and French-allied troops, coupled with the perceived lack of effective support from Russian mercenaries who were brought in as replacements, has exacerbated the crisis. The pattern of scapegoating external actors for internal failures, while perhaps a tactic to rally support, ultimately distracts from the core issues and fails to deliver tangible results on the ground.
The argument that France was actively draining Burkina Faso of its natural resources and hindering its development through mechanisms like the CFA Franc resonates with a segment of the population and offers a historical justification for seeking a complete break. This perspective suggests that the colonial past has left deep scars, and the current leadership is attempting to break free from those lingering economic and political dependencies, even if it means forging new, potentially more perilous, alliances.
However, the pivot towards Russia and China is a contentious one. While presented by some as an anti-colonial stance and a move towards genuine self-determination, critics argue that it amounts to trading one form of external influence for another, potentially more detrimental one. The presence of Russian propaganda online, for instance, suggests a coordinated effort to bolster the image of leaders like Ibrahim Traoré, portraying them as anti-Western heroes. Yet, the reality on the ground, where Russian support is seen as largely ineffective in combating the escalating Islamist insurgency, tells a different story.
The accusation that these leaders are ultimately power-hungry dictators who have sold their people out to foreign powers, rather than genuine liberators, is a serious one. The displacement of French influence has, in many observers’ eyes, paved the way for an increase in territory controlled by groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS. The effectiveness of the central government, which was reportedly in control of nearly the entire country before the French withdrawal, has diminished significantly, highlighting the potentially catastrophic consequences of this strategic shift.
Furthermore, the narrative of external blame conveniently overshadows domestic issues. While colonial legacies are undoubtedly significant, the role of corrupt leadership and internal governance failures cannot be ignored. The suspicion that leaders might resort to similar exploitative practices once external pressure is removed is a valid concern. The idea of swapping one colonizer for another, whether European or otherwise, raises serious questions about the long-term prospects for genuine sovereignty and development.
The parallels drawn with other African nations experiencing similar instability, such as Mali, underscore a broader regional trend of anti-Western sentiment and the search for alternative partnerships. However, the effectiveness and intentions of these new partners remain a subject of intense debate. The fear that this path will lead to more China/Russia-sponsored dictatorships and a proliferation of terrorist groups is a grim prediction that cannot be easily dismissed.
Ultimately, the decision by Burkina Faso to sever ties with France is a complex issue with deep historical roots and uncertain future implications. While driven by a desire to shed the remnants of colonialism and address pressing security concerns, the effectiveness of the chosen path, particularly the reliance on Russian support and the potential for new forms of exploitation, remains to be seen. The hope for a truly independent and prosperous future for Burkina Faso hinges on overcoming both external dependencies and internal challenges, a task that appears increasingly daunting given the current circumstances.