By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Days after the completion of a $14 million renovation, the Lincoln Memorial’s Reflecting Pool exhibited an unprecedented level of algae growth for June. Satellite data analysis revealed that the shallow water contained more algae than at any recorded point in the month over the past five years. This occurrence, following extensive refurbishment, raises questions about the effectiveness of the recent upgrades.
Read the original article here
The Lincoln Memorial’s Reflecting Pool has recently experienced one of the most significant algae blooms recorded in years, a troubling development that has emerged shortly after a substantial $14 million renovation project was completed. This striking transformation of the iconic pool from its intended shimmering blue to a murky green has naturally raised questions and concerns about the effectiveness and execution of the extensive refurbishment.
Days after the pool reopened following the $14 million investment, satellite data revealed an unprecedented level of algae. Specialized analysis of light-reflectance data, gathered by the European Sentinel-2 satellite, indicated more algae present in the pool in a single week than had been recorded in any June for at least the past five years. This metric, known as the normalized difference chlorophyll index (NDCI), which estimates the presence of chlorophyll-a (a pigment found in algae), showed a significant spike, placing the algae levels among the highest measured in any month over the preceding two years.
Compounding the issue of the overwhelming algae bloom, portions of the new coating applied during the $14 million renovation are already reported to be peeling away from the pool’s bottom. This dual problem of algae proliferation and deteriorating paint suggests a more complex set of challenges than initially anticipated and raises concerns about the longevity and quality of the work performed.
The situation has predictably led to a flurry of speculation and finger-pointing regarding accountability. There’s a prevalent sentiment that the National Park Service will likely attribute blame to the coating manufacturer and the contractor responsible for the application. Conversely, the contractor is expected to point fingers back at the National Park Service and the manufacturer, while the coating company may shift responsibility onto the contractor and the park service.
Adding a political dimension, some anticipate that former President Trump might dismiss the algae bloom as a “Democrat hoax” and attempt to frame his project as a success, despite the visible issues. This perspective is further fueled by comparisons made by some of his appointees, likening the algae situation to winning against Iran, a comparison that many find jarring and inappropriate given the context of a national monument’s aesthetic and functional decline.
The ultimate outcome of this unfolding situation appears to be a cycle of blame and a lack of clear accountability, with taxpayers ultimately bearing the cost. The expectation is that the Reflecting Pool will likely require a significant, potentially doubled, investment to restore it to its previous condition, a cost that could have been avoided with more effective planning and execution.
The choice of a darker color for the pool’s coating, intended to create a more vibrant blue, might have inadvertently contributed to the algae problem. Darker surfaces tend to absorb more heat, leading to warmer water temperatures. Warmer water is a known catalyst for increased algae growth, creating a feedback loop that exacerbates the problem.
Even the potential remedies proposed, such as adding hydrogen peroxide at low concentrations, have come under scrutiny. While peroxide can increase a water body’s capacity to hold dissolved oxygen, which can be beneficial, it’s also suggested that in this context, it might further damage the bond between the paint and the cement, leading to more peeling and a worsening of the structural integrity of the renovation.
The entire episode has become a potent symbol for many, seen as a metaphor for broader issues of failed projects and questionable resource allocation. The $14 million spent on what is now a visibly struggling landmark raises serious questions about where taxpayer money has gone and whether it was utilized effectively and responsibly, especially when considering the comparatively modest actual expenditure on the renovation itself versus the awarded sum.
The circumstances surrounding the renovation, including the possibility of no-bid contracts and companies with apparent inexperience in such specialized work, have fueled suspicions of financial impropriety. The idea that this was less of a genuine renovation and more of a “cash grab” or a means to launder money has gained traction among critics, who see it as a reflection of a pattern of behavior.
Furthermore, the very nature of the coating applied may have fundamentally altered the pool’s ecosystem. Historically, the granite composition of the Reflecting Pool acted as a natural filter as water leaked into the surrounding ground, requiring only periodic refilling. By sealing the pool with polyurethane, this natural filtration process has been eliminated, making it incredibly difficult to manage water quality and prevent algae blooms, even with mechanical filtration systems.
The unfolding algae crisis at the Reflecting Pool serves as a stark and highly visible reminder of the complexities involved in infrastructure projects, the importance of expert consultation, and the potential for unintended consequences when large sums of public money are involved. It’s a situation that continues to draw attention, prompting reflection on the decisions made and the future of this cherished national landmark.