By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Donald Trump has again expressed interest in Venezuela becoming the 51st U.S. state, a notion previously met with strong opposition. However, acting President Delcy Rodríguez has adopted a more reserved stance this time, prioritizing a transactional, self-survival approach over traditional anti-U.S. sentiment. This shift is driven by the Trump administration’s phased plan to address Venezuela’s crisis and its decision to work with Rodríguez over the political opposition, leading to eased sanctions and U.S. recognition of her leadership.
Read the original article here
The mere mention of the United States potentially gaining a 51st state, specifically Venezuela, has been met with a resounding lack of public response from the South American nation. It appears that any pronouncements regarding such a monumental shift in geopolitical status have simply landed with a thud, eliciting little to no official or widespread reaction.
This peculiar silence isn’t born out of agreement or enthusiasm, but rather from a strategic, and perhaps weary, decision to ignore what is largely perceived as nonsensical rhetoric. The idea that Venezuela could become the 51st state seems to fall into the category of pronouncements that are not taken seriously, much like the fluctuating suggestions of Greenland, Canada, or Cuba being next in line.
The prevailing sentiment appears to be one of an eye-roll, followed by the most sensible course of action: silence. This mirrors a reaction one might have to a ridiculous insult from a middle schooler, where engaging only amplifies the situation. In this case, ignoring the pronouncements creates less disturbance in the broader context of international relations.
There’s a discernible confusion surrounding the timeline and logic of such proposals. If the United States is grappling with an influx of immigrants, many of whom are Venezuelan, the idea of offering them statehood, which would enable legal entry, seems counterintuitive. It effectively negates the very idea of deportation or border control, presenting a circular and illogical scenario.
The proposition raises more questions than it answers. For instance, what would be the stance of those who currently advocate for stricter immigration policies, the so-called MAGA base, if millions of Venezuelans were suddenly to become U.S. citizens? The idea seems fundamentally at odds with their established viewpoints.
Furthermore, the discussion around making Venezuela a state seems to overshadow more pressing and, arguably, illegal actions. The notion of intervening in another country’s leadership, even if for complex reasons including oil, is a far graver matter that often gets sidelined by the latest attention-grabbing statement.
For many, the lack of a response from Venezuela is a testament to the understanding that such statements from the former president are often fleeting and unreliable. They are viewed as “bullshit” that is highly unlikely to materialize, rendering any official retort unnecessary.
The strategy of staying silent is seen as the most effective tactic. It’s akin to dealing with an elderly relative suffering from dementia or a toddler having a tantrum; by not engaging with the outlandish plan, the individual eventually moves on to the next fixation. This approach prevents escalation and avoids giving any perceived legitimacy to the proposal.
The official policy of silence from Venezuela is seen as the correct and mature response. Why should every delusional statement from a political figure be entertained and debated? It’s a sign of things going awry when such outlandish ideas become headlines.
The implications of Venezuela saying “yes” to statehood are also considered. It would undoubtedly create significant internal political debate within the U.S., particularly concerning the partisan balance in Congress and the potential for millions of new voters. The idea of suddenly absorbing such a population and the associated responsibilities, like social security and minimum wage, is a complex one.
Venezuelans are perceived as being accustomed to politicians making grand, often empty, pronouncements. Their current silence reflects a mature understanding that engaging with such statements is unproductive and unnecessary. It allows them to maintain their independence and avoid giving any pretext for further intervention or military action.
The idea of making Venezuela a state before even considering long-standing issues like Puerto Rico’s status further highlights the perceived capriciousness of the proposal. It’s not about the welfare of Venezuelans, but rather, some suggest, about access to resources like oil.
The notion of the U.S. suddenly embracing millions of immigrants as citizens is so improbable that it prompts disbelief, with some even joking about jumping into the ocean if such a scenario were to occur. The connection to unrelated matters, like the Epstein files, further illustrates the chaotic and tangential nature of these discussions.
The correct response, according to many, is to remain silent until the idea is forgotten and a new distraction emerges. To respond with a firm “no” might even provoke further unwanted attention or action. It’s a strategy of waiting out the storm, as the pronouncements are rarely followed by concrete action.
The potential consequences of annexing Venezuela are vast, touching upon economic, social, and political spheres. The idea of immediately granting citizenship to millions, along with the associated rights and responsibilities, presents an enormous challenge.
The economic impact of such a move, including the potential for inflation and changes to U.S. entitlement programs, is a significant concern. Moreover, the added responsibility of protecting a vastly expanded border would fundamentally alter the U.S.’s geopolitical landscape.
The comparison to how Canada reacted to a similar, albeit different, situation in the past serves as a cautionary tale. The potential for a country to actually accept such a proposal and demand statehood is a scenario that could lead to unforeseen complications.
Ultimately, the silence from Venezuela regarding the idea of becoming the 51st state is a pragmatic and reasoned response to what is widely viewed as political theater. It’s a recognition that engaging with such ephemeral and improbable proposals is a waste of energy and offers no tangible benefit.