By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite official assurances, the arrival of a cruise ship with a multinational passenger list has evoked unwelcome comparisons to the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic for many Canary Islanders. These residents recall the initial outbreak, which began with a German tourist on La Gomera and led to the quarantine of approximately 1,000 individuals at a Tenerife hotel. The situation serves as a potent reminder of the widespread impact the virus once had on the region.
Read the original article here
The looming presence of a ship carrying Hantavirus has cast a shadow over Tenerife, sparking a potent mix of anger and resignation among its residents. The very idea of a vessel sailing with such a dangerous contagion, potentially bringing it closer to their shores, has ignited a palpable sense of unease. This situation has prompted a wave of discussions and reactions, highlighting a profound frustration with the current approach to managing such outbreaks and a weary familiarity with the anxieties that accompany them.
Many are questioning the logic behind the ship’s movements, voicing sentiments that it should have been immediately quarantined until the incubation period for the virus had passed. The notion of tracking individuals across various locations or leaving each country to fend for itself in dealing with potential infections seems inefficient and, frankly, alarming. The perception is that the ship is on an unstoppable global journey, inadvertently carrying a plague, and this current predicament is only amplifying a pre-existing anxiety related to past negative events involving Dutch involvement on the island.
The reluctance of any nation or location to accept a ship carrying a deadly virus is understandable, and the reaction in Tenerife is seen as a natural response to such a threat. This has led to imaginative, if somewhat far-fetched, suggestions like dedicated “hospital ships” that could manage such situations without necessitating further international complications. The situation also elicits cynical humor, with one person wryly noting that they half-expected a drastic, albeit unrealistic, suggestion like nuking the ship. The swift potential spread of disease is a grim reminder of how interconnected the world has become, and the fear that if it surfaces in one place, it could rapidly appear elsewhere, is a chilling thought.
A pervasive sense of doom seems to permeate some of the reactions, with an emphatic and raw expression of frustration and fear. The thought of yet another period of prolonged confinement, even if it was shorter than the historical quarantine durations, and the return of mask mandates, brings back the unwelcome memories of recent global health crises. The historical context of quarantine, stemming from the Black Death, underscores the gravity of such measures, and the current scenario triggers a deep-seated dread of reliving such experiences.
There’s a cynical observation that the concept of contagion is dismissed by certain ideologies, suggesting a prioritization of economic gain over public health, even at the cost of vulnerable populations. The grim reality of life on board such a ship, especially for an extended period with nowhere to go, is acknowledged as a potentially miserable experience, even for those who have only been on shorter cruises. The fear of the virus spreading via indirect means, such as rats traveling along mooring ropes or even swimming ashore, adds another layer to the concerns.
The argument is made that not everyone on board is necessarily infected, and therefore, asking those who are not to remain in potential harm’s way for an extended period raises ethical questions. Furthermore, the possibility of late-stage infection means that the incubation period might begin only after disembarkation. It is also pointed out that a return to home countries would allow for more comfortable and resource-rich quarantine environments, as individuals have rights and should not be subjected to undue suffering for circumstances beyond their control. The significant incubation period of Hantavirus and the rights of those on board are crucial considerations in this complex situation.
The mention of Tenerife often brings to mind a specific past incident for some, though its exact nature remains obscure to others, possibly because it didn’t involve ships or viruses directly but left a lasting, negative impression. This phenomenon of a place becoming synonymous with a tragic event is a common human tendency, etching certain locations into collective memory. The idea that individuals who choose to board a “giant petri dish in the ocean” should then face the consequences without complaint is a harsh perspective.
There’s a darkly humorous reference to former political figures and their actions during past crises, suggesting ulterior motives behind decisions regarding the ship. The widespread reluctance to offer assistance is noted, implying a lack of collective will to address such issues. The potential destination for the ship is questioned, with a suggestion for a more remote port, and a playful, yet pointed, pun on the island’s name is made. The historical precedent of a ship failing to quarantine and leading to a devastating outbreak in Marseille serves as a stark warning of the consequences of inaction.
The grim reality of Hantavirus, capable of affecting even healthy individuals, is acknowledged, leading to a cynical observation about a societal sacrifice mirroring the vulnerability of the elderly and immunocompromised for the benefit of the wealthy. The discomfort of those on board is weighed against the potential for a global epidemic on the scale of COVID-19, with a sarcastic question about whether the world should be inconvenienced for the sake of a cruise. The inherent understanding that most passengers would likely grasp the necessity of difficult measures, even if they desire shorter, more enjoyable cruises, is also present.
Innovative solutions are proposed, such as floating quarantine wards that could operate remotely, minimizing the need for direct contact with land. The specific nature of Hantavirus, its rat origin, and the concerning possibility of person-to-person transmission, especially with the Andes strain suspected in this case, heightens the apprehension. The purpose of quarantine is reiterated as a protective measure, not punitive, and the absence of a vaccine for Hantavirus underscores the seriousness of the situation. The efficiency of keeping individuals on board for quarantine, especially when considering the logistics of transferring and quarantining them in their home countries, is presented as a practical consideration, especially when dealing with a novel global virus. The enduring association of Tenerife with past tragedies, even those unrelated to current events, highlights the psychological impact of significant incidents on a place’s identity. The mention of the Dutch being involved again adds a layer of historical resonance and perhaps a weary sense of déjà vu.