By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Donald Trump’s physician has stated that he remains in excellent health following his May physical exam, noting strong cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, and overall physical function. The physician recommended continued weight loss and increased physical activity, as Trump’s weight has increased by 14 pounds since his previous exam. The president scored perfectly on a cognitive test, confirming his fitness to serve. While leg swelling was noted, it showed improvement from the previous year, and a comprehensive neurological exam revealed normal mental status and physical function.
Read the original article here
The recent pronouncements from President Trump’s physician paint a rather interesting picture of his current health. On one hand, the doctor has declared him to be in “excellent health,” citing strong cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, and overall physical function, and deeming him “fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State.” This sounds like a glowing report, one that would typically suggest a robust individual at the peak of their physical and mental capabilities.
However, this declaration of “excellent health” is immediately juxtaposed with a recommendation that the President “lose weight and exercise more.” This creates a bit of a conceptual puzzle, doesn’t it? If someone is in truly excellent health, one might not expect such straightforward directives for lifestyle changes. It’s akin to being told you’re in perfect condition, but you really ought to hit the gym more often and cut back on the snacks.
The underlying implication, of course, is that while the president may not have any immediately apparent critical health issues, there are certainly areas where improvement is advised. This is a common scenario for many individuals, where the baseline health is functional, but there’s room for optimization to prevent future problems and enhance overall well-being. The doctor’s words suggest that, despite the president’s current fitness for duty, a more proactive approach to his physical condition could be beneficial.
The idea that President Trump believes humans have a finite energy level, like a battery, and that exercising depletes this energy, thus shortening lifespan, is a rather unique perspective on physical activity. This viewpoint seems to be a significant factor in his reluctance to engage in more rigorous exercise. It’s a stark contrast to the widely accepted understanding that regular physical activity, while expending energy in the short term, contributes to long-term health and can, in fact, lead to a longer and more vigorous life.
This belief system, if indeed it’s his guiding principle, would naturally lead to a disinclination towards exercise, even when medically advised. It frames the act of exercising not as an investment in health, but as a withdrawal from a limited personal resource, which is a rather pessimistic outlook on one’s own vitality. It’s a perspective that would likely clash with any doctor’s recommendation to increase physical exertion.
The statement that the doctor said he’s in “excellent health” but also needs to “lose weight and exercise more” has been met with some skepticism, prompting observations that no doctor would typically phrase it that way without further context. This suggests a feeling that the “excellent health” part might be a polite or politically motivated statement, while the core advice points to underlying concerns about his physical condition. The idea of him being “a fat fuck” is a blunt expression of this sentiment, highlighting the perceived disconnect between the official assessment and visible reality.
Some have speculated that the doctor’s phrasing might be similar to a doctor telling someone they are in “remarkable health *for a man in your shape*.” This implies a nuanced assessment where the “excellent health” is acknowledged within the context of existing physical limitations or characteristics, rather than as an absolute state of peak fitness. It’s a way of saying, “You’re doing okay, considering…” which, while technically true, doesn’t quite convey the idea of robust, uncompromised health.
There’s also a sentiment that the weight description might be inaccurate, with the actual weight being presented as “perfect” by the president himself at other times. This raises questions about the credibility of the reported figures, suggesting a potential for massaging the numbers to fit a desired narrative. The comparison to “North Korea tier propaganda” points to a distrust in the official health reports, seeing them as potentially manipulated for public relations purposes rather than as objective medical assessments.
A rather grim suggestion is that he should not lose weight and instead exercise in short, intense bursts, aiming to get his heart rate into the “healthy 200s range” once a week. This is a hyperbolic and clearly not a serious medical recommendation, used to emphasize the perceived extreme of his current condition and the need for drastic, though likely unsafe, intervention. It’s a sarcastic jab at the idea that he needs to dramatically increase his cardiovascular exertion.
The more critical perspectives highlight the potential for significant health issues given his age, diet, and weight. The mention of eating “McDonalds and dragging around at least 60 pounds of excess fat” leads to the conclusion of probable metabolic dysfunction, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and at least one heart condition. This paints a picture of a man whose lifestyle choices are likely taking a serious toll on his internal health, regardless of the outward pronouncements of “excellent health.”
A crucial question arises regarding the source of these statements: “Is this what Trump’s doctor said, or is it what Trump said his doctor said?” This distinction is vital, as it speaks to the potential for personal interpretation or even fabrication to shape the public perception of his health. If the latter is true, it implies a deliberate effort to control the narrative and present a more favorable image than might be medically accurate.
The idea that he wouldn’t engage in the necessary work for his health, because it would be too challenging, is also brought up. The notion that “the hardest challenge he has ever faced was being born” is a cynical commentary on his perceived work ethic and commitment to self-improvement, suggesting he would avoid any effort that isn’t immediately gratifying or simple.
The observation that “People in excellent health do no fall asleep in the middle of the day during a cabinet meeting” directly challenges the “excellent health” claim. Such an occurrence is presented as a clear indicator of fatigue or a more serious underlying condition, contradicting the doctor’s assessment. Similarly, the mocking of his cognitive test performance, where identifying animals is presented as a benchmark of “perfect cognitive health,” underscores a general skepticism about the validity of the health evaluations.
The proposed height and weight figures are also scrutinized, with the suggestion that if these are inaccurate, the entire report loses credibility. This points to a desire for factual accuracy and transparency in health reporting, especially for a public figure. The vivid and aggressive imagery used in some comments, urging him to “Eat more shit good to your heart’s content,” reflects a deep dissatisfaction and a desire for him to continue his current habits, ironically, as a form of self-inflicted downfall.
The doctor’s supposed advice, if not followed, is seen as a direct path to self-destruction, with the “best healthcare on earth” being unable to save him if he continues with his current diet and lack of exercise. This highlights the belief that personal responsibility and adherence to medical advice are paramount, and that even the best medical interventions have their limits when faced with consistently unhealthy lifestyle choices.
The direct contradiction between “excellent health” and the need for weight loss and exercise is pointed out, with some stating it’s “worse than I thought if they are admitting he is fat now.” This suggests that the acknowledgment of his weight is, in itself, a worrying sign, implying that his health is not as robust as initially presented. The visceral descriptions of his physical state, including “cankles,” “neck vagina,” and the need for “vitamin KFC,” are used to paint a starkly unflattering picture that contrasts sharply with the “excellent health” report.
There’s a recurring theme that Trump’s doctors, historically, have a “history of lying about his health,” dating back to the “bone spurs guy.” This suggests a pattern of perceived obfuscation or exaggeration to protect the president’s image, leading to a general distrust of any medical statements made on his behalf. The potential for legal repercussions for lying about the health of a sitting president is also raised, questioning the accountability of medical professionals in such situations.
The idea that this is “North Korea tier propaganda” and “hilarious they lie about both his height and weight” points to a widespread perception that the health reports are designed to mislead the public. The wish for doctors who would simply declare perfect health regardless of actions, and the description of him as a “fat piece of shit” that many Americans “identify with” due to shared obesity, reflect a candid and often harsh public commentary on his physical condition and its societal implications.
The final “FIFY” (Fixed For You) adding “for a man dying slowly from metabolic disease” to the “excellent health” statement encapsulates the prevailing sentiment: that the pronouncements of excellent health are a thin veneer over a more concerning underlying reality, and that his lifestyle choices are actively detrimental to his long-term well-being.