By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Members of a US-wide neo-Nazi “active club” network have been participating in riot-style combat events in Virginia. These gatherings, held at a secretive compound run by the neopagan white nationalist group Wolves of Vinland, involve training and fighting alongside other white supremacist organizations. The founder of the active club movement, Robert Rundo, has described these events as a “tip-off point for a fascist cultural revolution,” highlighting the groups’ ambition to build a parallel system and a “standby militia.” Experts warn that these groups, which blend extremism with combat sports for recruitment, pose a significant public danger.
Read the original article here
Members of neo-Nazi “active clubs” have been observed participating in combat training events at a secluded compound in Virginia, raising concerns among experts about the growing threat posed by these extremist organizations. These groups, which often intertwine right-wing extremism with fitness and combat sports, utilize these activities as a method to recruit and radicalize individuals across the United States. The training regimen itself appears to be a significant component, with speculation about names like “Iron Cross Fit” or “Kallisthenics,” and some suggesting it’s a form of MMA or Krav Maga training, mirroring tactics seen in similar European groups. The intensity of these workouts is a deliberate part of their strategy, designed to build both physical prowess and ideological commitment.
The secretive nature of these gatherings, often referred to as “compounds,” immediately sparks suspicion, and this particular event in Virginia is no exception. The fact that participants include individuals with backgrounds in law enforcement, such as a former West Virginia police officer who now runs a grappling gym for children, is particularly alarming. This presence of former law enforcement personnel within these extremist circles highlights a disturbing infiltration and suggests a potential for trained individuals to lend their skills to radical causes. The “active clubs” moniker is a conscious adoption of strategies used by similar groups in Europe, indicating a coordinated effort to organize and expand their influence.
The location of these events, in or around Lynchburg, Virginia, has been noted with a sense of grim recognition, as Virginia has a history of hosting various hate groups. It’s a stark contrast to the state’s popular slogan, “Virginia is for lovers,” and underscores the reality that extremist ideologies fester even in seemingly ordinary locales. The organizers of these groups often use euphemisms or project a veneer of legitimacy, with some claiming a “Pan-European” identity, which can be a subtle precursor to more overtly racist ideologies. The shift in political climate, particularly the perceived rerouting of FBI resources away from investigating far-right extremists, has created an environment where these groups feel emboldened to organize and prepare for their stated objectives, which can include fomenting armed insurgency.
The notion of these gatherings as mere “rallies” or “training exercises” belies the dangerous paramilitary nature of these organizations. Countries that fail to treat such groups as organized crime are often described as “shitholes,” a harsh but pointed observation about the inadequacy of responses to escalating extremism. The presence of former police officers and martial arts instructors among the attendees suggests a deliberate effort to cultivate a well-trained and capable cadre. This is not about mere casual fitness; it’s about honing combat skills for ideological purposes.
The broader implications of these “active clubs” are significant, especially considering the rhetoric of some political figures, like the infamous “stand back and stand by” comment, which some interpret as a tacit encouragement for these groups. The idea that these individuals, often described as “losers” and “chuckleheads,” are preparing for potential civil conflict is a sobering thought. The irony of some participants potentially listening to bands like Rage Against the Machine while engaging in neo-Nazi activities, perhaps misinterpreting the message to align with their own grievances, adds another layer of disturbing cognitive dissonance.
While the numbers involved in any single gathering might seem small relative to the overall population, the decentralized nature of these “loose networks” and their move towards rural compounds for training is a concerning trend. It allows them to operate with a degree of anonymity and to foster a sense of community among like-minded individuals. The fact that these groups are often characterized by internal conflict, addiction, or encounters with law enforcement suggests a self-destructive element, but their underlying ideology and willingness to train for violence remain a potent threat. The emphasis on combat training, coupled with a recruitment strategy that targets vulnerable individuals through fitness and seemingly innocuous activities, makes them a potential public danger that cannot be ignored. The presence of former law enforcement within their ranks is a particularly worrying development, requiring vigilance and a robust response from authorities who are not compromised.