By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Mesa, AZ — A 52-year-old man, identified as Eric Baker, died Saturday night following his arrest by Mesa police officers. Officers attempted to stop Baker for a traffic violation, but he reportedly fled and resisted arrest, assaulting officers during the struggle. Although Baker was placed in handcuffs, he continued to exhibit erratic behavior and became unresponsive en route to the hospital for a pre-booking medical clearance. Despite life-saving efforts, he was pronounced dead at the hospital, and the Maricopa County Medical Examiner’s Office is investigating the cause of death.
Read the original article here
A man has died in Mesa police custody Saturday night, sparking a flurry of questions and concerns about the circumstances surrounding his death. The incident began when Mesa police reportedly observed a man riding a bicycle without a headlight near Dobson Road and University Drive around 8:30 p.m.
Following this observation, an encounter occurred that led to a brief struggle. Police state that after this struggle, the man was placed in handcuffs and arrested. The charges against him were aggravated assault on a police officer and an active felony warrant.
After the struggle, the Mesa Fire Department was called to the scene to provide medical aid. The man was then taken to the hospital for what is described as a “pre-booking medical clearance.”
It was during transport to the hospital that the man became unresponsive. Despite life-saving efforts by medical personnel, he was pronounced dead at the hospital.
Witness accounts and available video footage offer a different perspective on the encounter. One individual who claims to have captured video of the event asserts that the man was not fighting the officers, but rather pleading and crying out that he couldn’t breathe. The video reportedly shows officers pinning a man to the ground, and audio on the recording includes shouts that appear to be “stop resisting.” The use of this phrase, particularly when someone claims they cannot breathe, raises serious concerns for many.
The question of whether any officers were injured during this struggle remains unclear. There’s a strong sentiment that if there were injuries, they would have been prominently reported, suggesting that officers likely emerged unharmed from the altercation.
Adding another layer to the situation, the reason for the initial stop – a bicycle without a headlight – is seen by some as a minor infraction, especially when compared to other observed traffic violations that police might not address. This has led to criticism that police are focusing on less significant issues while more serious ones may go unaddressed.
The existence of an active felony warrant is mentioned as part of the arrest. However, details about the nature of this warrant have not been provided, leaving room for speculation. Some commenters express a sentiment that warrants are becoming increasingly common.
The medical clearance before booking is interpreted by some as a sign of the severity of the man’s condition after the encounter with law enforcement, suggesting a level of force that necessitated immediate medical attention.
The assertion from a witness that the man was crying out “I can’t breathe” is particularly resonant, given the history of similar cases involving deaths in police custody. The reported “stop resisting” commands during this situation are viewed by many as a common tactic used by police that can be employed to justify force.
The reputation of the Mesa Police Department is a recurring theme in discussions surrounding this incident. Many commenters suggest that the department has a long-standing negative reputation, and this incident, to them, does not deviate from that perception. Some link this reputation to broader societal issues, including political and religious influences.
There’s a perspective that law enforcement officers are trained to use phrases like “stop resisting” as a preemptive measure or a narrative-setting tool during arrests. This training, according to some, can be used to legitimize the use of force and ensure that an individual is charged with a crime. The intention behind such tactics, from this viewpoint, is to create a record that supports the officers’ actions.
Further complicating the narrative, some individuals claim to know the deceased and assert that he had a history of aggression and was known to be a problematic individual who frequently picked fights, often while intoxicated. These accounts suggest that his interactions with law enforcement may have stemmed from a pattern of behavior, and that his death, while tragic, might have been an unfortunate but perhaps predictable outcome given his alleged past actions. One commenter specifically states they were attacked by the man at a convenience store, and that the store employee already had called the police on him, with the incident being captured on video. This perspective implies that the initial stop might have been more than just a random encounter, as officers may have recognized the individual.
The broader context of police interactions with marginalized communities is also raised. There’s a concern that individuals perceived as homeless or poor are disproportionately targeted by law enforcement, sometimes for reasons that appear arbitrary or driven by a desire to assert authority. The lack of a strong support system for such individuals is seen as a factor that can enable this type of alleged harassment.
The use of body cameras is a point of contention for some, with skepticism about their true purpose. The argument is made that if the footage from these cameras is not readily accessible to the public, then the cameras were not primarily installed for public safety or transparency. There are also claims that body camera footage can be manipulated or that officers have a history of turning them off or failing to record crucial moments.
The notion of “pre-booking medical clearance” is interpreted by some as a way for police to mitigate potential liability rather than a genuine concern for the arrestee’s well-being, implying a belief that the individual was significantly harmed during the arrest.
Ultimately, while the official account from the Mesa Police Department outlines the sequence of events leading to the man’s death, the surrounding commentary and witness statements introduce significant doubts and raise profound questions about the use of force, police accountability, and the circumstances that led to this tragic outcome. The lack of transparency regarding the felony warrant and the specifics of the medical intervention at the hospital further fuel these concerns.