By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Hungary’s Tisza party, led by Péter Magyar, has secured a decisive election victory, ending Viktor Orbán’s 16-year rule and potentially reshaping the nation’s relationship with the EU. The win grants Tisza a super-majority in parliament, enabling constitutional amendments and a potential reversal of Orbán’s policies. This outcome is being closely watched globally, signaling a shift in the influence of right-wing populist movements.
Read the original article here
It feels like a breath of fresh air for Hungary, a nation that desperately needed some good news this year. After sixteen long years, Viktor Orbán has been ousted from power, and the sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, especially from those who have watched his tenure with concern. It’s almost poetic that his perceived alignment with certain controversial figures seemed to coincide with the erosion of his political chances. The idea of Trump and Putin now being in mourning, with their metaphorical flags at half-mast, captures the mood quite effectively.
What’s particularly striking is that Orbán actually conceded the election. This stands in stark contrast to the “rigged and fixed” narratives that have unfortunately become familiar elsewhere, leading to insurrections and undermining democratic processes. It’s almost as if a lesson can be drawn here for other nations, demonstrating that even deeply entrenched figures can eventually acknowledge defeat when the writing is on the wall. The implication is that the disinformation networks, often a cornerstone of such regimes, have ultimately failed, suggesting a long-term vulnerability for them.
The scale of the opposition’s victory is substantial, with the Tisza party securing far more mandates than Fidesz ever managed to achieve. This isn’t just a narrow win; it appears to be a decisive mandate for change. The talk of a “rock-solid 2/3 supermajority” is particularly interesting, as it raises immediate questions about the pace of policy shifts. Will these changes be swift, or will there be a period of months before the new government can fully implement its agenda?
There’s a distinct sense that endorsements from figures like JD Vance and Donald Trump have become a kiss of death in electoral politics. Each time they back a candidate, it seems to lead to a loss, prompting some to label them as “suckers and losers.” This suggests a significant negative correlation between their support and electoral success, at least in this instance. The future for Orbán in Hungary, under these circumstances, is being painted as far from pleasant.
The headline announcing this shift feels almost surreal, like something plucked from a science fiction novel. The disbelief that this is a reality underscores the long shadow Orbán cast over the country. However, the overall feeling is one of congratulatory sentiment for Hungary, coupled with a hopeful plea not to squander this newfound opportunity for a more democratic path. The notion of a “Trump touch” that transmutes everything into “shit,” as opposed to gold, is a vivid metaphor being used to describe the potential negative ripple effects for similar movements.
This outcome is being seen as a harbinger of bad news for MAGA and similar movements elsewhere. The hope is that if Hungary can achieve this, other nations might be inspired to follow suit. There’s a desire for similar political upheavals, with people in countries like Croatia hoping for a change against their own long-standing governments, though acknowledging the challenges posed by public apathy or perceived ignorance. The idea of holding Orbán accountable and potentially initiating criminal proceedings is also a strong sentiment.
The dramatic pronouncements attributed to Orbán, picturing only darkness, and the imagined response from Putin, reminding him that “no king rules forever,” capture the dramatic shift in power. The mention of “16 years” as “rookie numbers” is a sarcastic nod to the longevity of some leaders, but the overall sentiment is that this is a truly significant turning point. Finally, some good news is arriving, and the idea that anything touched by the Trump administration “turns to shit” is a recurring theme.
This is unequivocally a good day for many, with the chant “Ruszkik haza!” (Russians go home!) echoing the sentiment of reclaiming the country from perceived Russian influence. The hope is that this success will translate to upcoming elections, particularly in the US midterms. The word “prison” being floated as a potential future for Orbán underscores the gravity of the accusations and sentiments surrounding his rule.
There’s a genuine surprise that the elections were fair and transparent, leading to this outcome. The feeling is that “the world is healing,” and the probable “super-majority” for the opposition, despite Orbán’s efforts at gerrymandering, is a testament to the people’s will. The focus is now on securing the country, not just politically but also by actively dismantling Russian networks, agents, and financing, which are seen as persistent threats seeking to install puppet leaders.
The wish for Putin to witness the failure of his “fascist empire” before his demise is a powerful sentiment. A big smile is being plastered on faces as this news unfolds, and the hope is that the new leadership, Peter (presumably Peter Magyar, the leader of Tisza), can curtail the damage already inflicted. A key concern is the potential for assassination attempts or further meddling from those who stand to lose. The “Vance-effect” is being discussed, questioning the purpose of his visit and whether it inadvertently harmed Orbán’s chances.
This victory is being seen as an inspiration for others, raising the question of when similar changes might occur in other countries, such as Israel or even with Prime Minister Modi. The sheer fact that “we did it!” is being exclaimed speaks volumes about the collective effort and hope invested in this outcome. Despite the overwhelming victory, there’s still a lingering question of whether Orbán might attempt to stage a coup, given the unprecedented nature of his defeat.
It’s finally “Victover” for Orbán, a play on his name signifying his defeat. As a Hungarian, the pride is palpable; the people acted decisively when it mattered most, not after the fact when it’s easier. This event is seen as more than just a local political moment; it’s a demonstration that ordinary citizens can still influence the direction of the free world, and this time, they succeeded. The idea that Trump might not be able to achieve even “half-mast” mourning, given his age and current standing, is a pointed remark.
The overwhelming defeat suggests that tactics of denial might not be as effective when the evidence is so stark. The high voter turnout, exceeding 77 percent—a record for Hungary—is highlighted as crucial. This level of participation is seen as the most effective way to keep extreme elements at bay, as the majority of people are “normal” and want to steer their countries in a sensible direction. The comparison to US and Western European voter turnout further emphasizes the significance of Hungary’s participation.
The astonishing aspect is Orbán’s straightforward concession, without resorting to claims of foul play or attempting to disrupt the electoral process. This leads to the conclusion that Hungary might now have a better chance of developing a free and fair democracy than the United States. The phrase “An f u to you know who… You didn’t do enough!” carries a clear message of defiance and satisfaction.
The reality of a handover period, where Fidesz serves as a caretaker government for a month, is acknowledged. The speed and extent of policy changes will depend on whether the opposition secures a super-majority. It’s noted that handovers aren’t always immediate, and the deep embedding of Orbán loyalists in state institutions, media, and the legal system will likely present challenges and potential resistance to change. The speculation about his retirement plans, with suggestions he might “pull a Yanukovych and hop on the next plane to Russia,” reflects the prevailing sentiment about his political future.