By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Washington State has enacted a 9.9% tax on annual income exceeding $1 million, a measure that passed both the House and Senate and is slated for the governor’s signature. This “millionaires tax” is projected to generate billions annually, funding crucial state programs for low-income families, children, and small businesses, while also addressing historic tax code imbalances that disproportionately burdened lower-income residents. Despite Republican opposition and over 60 proposed amendments, Democratic lawmakers successfully passed the bill, which will take effect on January 1, 2028, and is seen as a significant victory for labor and grassroots movements.
Read the original article here
Washington State lawmakers have officially approved a “millionaires tax,” a significant legislative development that will impose a 9.9% tax on annual income exceeding $1 million. This groundbreaking measure, narrowly passed in the House by a 51-46 vote after a similar endorsement in the Senate, is now en route to Governor Bob Ferguson’s desk, with a promise to sign it into law. The journey to this point wasn’t without its hurdles, as Republicans attempted to block the bill with numerous “poison pill” amendments, aiming to derail its progress during the legislature’s shorter session. However, Democratic lawmakers, led by Speaker Laurie Jinkins, stood firm, rejecting amendment after amendment during an extended floor debate.
The impetus behind this tax stems from a growing sentiment in Washington State, a place that, unlike many others, has historically lacked a graduated state income tax. This has meant a heavy reliance on regressive taxes like sales and property taxes, contributing to multi-billion-dollar deficits that strain essential public services such as education, healthcare, and transportation. For years, the state has grappled with substantial budget shortfalls, all while billionaires who have amassed fortunes through Washington-based companies like Amazon and Microsoft have largely paid no state income tax on their immense profits. This disparity has fueled a powerful grassroots movement, supported by labor organizations like the Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO, which have been vocal advocates for a more equitable tax system.
Initially, Governor Ferguson had expressed reservations about the Senate’s version of the bill, believing it didn’t adequately allocate funds for programs supporting low-income families, children, and small businesses. However, a crucial amendment, championed by legislator April Berg, redirected 5% of the anticipated revenues to the Fair Start for Kids Act. This revision was met with strong approval from the Governor, who lauded the bill as “historic” and reaffirmed his commitment to signing it. The bill is projected to generate between $3.5 billion and $4 billion annually, impacting an estimated 20,000 to 30,000 high-income earners. Importantly, it provides exemptions for primary residences, investments, and personal property, and is set to take effect at the beginning of 2028.
During the legislative process, particularly in the Senate, some Democratic senators highlighted the urgent need for such a tax, framing it as a necessary measure to offset federal budget cuts to vital programs like Medicaid and SNAP, which they attributed to a trillion-dollar tax cut for the wealthy signed by President Trump. These arguments were met with procedural objections from Republican senators, who sought to prevent any references to the former president. The political battle over this tax has not been confined to legislative chambers; Republican efforts to obstruct the bill reportedly led to a surge of vitriolic phone calls and emails targeting the House Democratic Caucus, laced with hateful language, threats, and intimidation. This has understandably raised concerns for the safety of lawmakers, their families, and their staff, prompting some to implement security measures beyond the usual scope of public service.
The passage of this tax has ignited a lively debate, with differing perspectives on its implications and fairness. While some express relief and see it as a long-overdue step towards fiscal responsibility, others voice concerns about potential economic repercussions, such as wealthy individuals or businesses relocating. There’s also a discussion about the terminology itself, with some pointing out that “millionaires tax” might be a misnomer, as it specifically targets income over $1 million rather than accumulated wealth, and that many individuals considered millionaires may not meet this annual income threshold. This distinction is important, as it differentiates this measure from other forms of wealth taxes that have faced legal challenges in other states.
A common sentiment is that those who have benefited most from the state’s prosperous economic environment, particularly in areas like King County, should contribute more to the public good. It’s argued that the very systems and investments made possible by taxes funded public education, infrastructure, and public health, which in turn cultivated the conditions for high-income jobs and businesses to thrive. The feeling for some is that the benefits of this growth should be shared more equitably, especially when a significant portion of state tax revenue collected in wealthier areas is used to fund services in other parts of the state.
Despite concerns about the wealthy relocating, there’s a counter-argument that such threats are often exaggerated and that many high-earners are tied to their businesses and communities and may not find other locations as attractive or feasible for relocation. The legislation itself has also drawn scrutiny regarding its potential for future adjustments. Some have expressed worry that the threshold for the tax could be lowered administratively over time, effectively turning it into a broader income tax, especially given that Washington State’s constitution has historically presented obstacles to implementing a broad income tax. However, proponents argue that this measure is a necessary step to address a long-standing imbalance in the tax code, ensuring that the state can adequately fund its essential services and support its most vulnerable populations. The debate over how to best fund public services in Washington State continues, but for now, a significant change has been enacted with the approval of this millionaires tax.