By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Arielle Angel experiences a recurring nightmare where she finds herself on a plane bound for Israel, triggering intense panic. This dream highlights her internal conflict and apprehension regarding her connection to Israel. The scenario often culminates in the dream plane landing, or Angel waking upon arrival and encountering her Israeli relatives, underscoring the deeply personal and emotional nature of her unease.
Read the original article here
It seems there’s a significant and growing segment within the American Jewish community that is expressing deep disillusionment with Israel. This isn’t a fringe opinion; rather, it appears to be reaching a “critical mass,” suggesting a widespread sentiment that can no longer be ignored. This growing disgust isn’t necessarily a rejection of Judaism itself, but a profound disappointment with the current political trajectory and actions of the Israeli state, particularly under leaders like Netanyahu.
Many are drawing a firm line between their Jewish identity and their critique of Israel’s policies. It’s becoming increasingly clear that for a substantial number of American Jews, criticizing Israel is not tantamount to antisemitism. Instead, they view it as a moral imperative, a necessary response to actions they deem unjust or even criminal. The idea that supporting Israel is a mandatory component of Jewish identity is being challenged, with many emphasizing that one can love Judaism and still be vehemently opposed to the current Israeli government’s actions.
This discontent is fueled by a perception that Israel has embraced extremism and that its government is engaged in actions that can only be described as “blatant corruption and war crimes.” There’s a sense that the more civilized, peace-seeking elements within the broader Jewish community are being overshadowed by what some describe as “fascist bastards” or a government acting with sheer hate. This internal struggle, the idea of Israel being at war with itself between its more “civilized side” and its extremist elements, is a recurring theme in these sentiments.
The notion that ethnic groups have exclusive, divinely ordained land rights is also being questioned, with some finding this justification for perpetual conflict to be absurdist. This perspective suggests that a universal standard of human rights and ethics should apply, rather than adhering to a belief system that could be interpreted as supremacist. The argument is often made that the conflict is not a matter of religion, but of fundamental right versus wrong, and that humanity has become too polarized, trapped in a “you’re either with us or against us” mentality.
For some, this critical shift in perspective began years ago, with specific events serving as turning points. Actions like the march into the Temple Mount are cited as moments of pure, hate-filled provocation that irrevocably damaged their connection to Israel. Others have found themselves increasingly alienated by what they perceive as Israeli actions towards Palestinians, including, in their view, apartheid, genocide, and war crimes, stating that it took a long time for them to reach this point of disgust.
This growing sentiment among American Jews is seen by some as a positive development, particularly in light of what they perceive as the Democratic Party’s potential to ignore it. The hope is that this growing disillusionment will encourage a more critical examination of U.S. foreign policy and aid. The fact that millions of Americans, regardless of their background, are willing to protest and demand change from their own government suggests a parallel desire for accountability and ethical conduct on the international stage.
The distinction between Jewish people and the state of Israel is paramount for many expressing these views. They emphasize that their opposition is directed at the policies and actions of the Israeli government, not at the Jewish people as a whole. The existence of strong friendships between Arabs and Jews, with both parties united in their opposition to Israel’s actions, further solidifies this distinction.
Concerns are also being raised about the potential for this growing critique to be misconstrued as antisemitism, with some anticipating that politicians might still label those who question Israel as antisemitic. This fear highlights the ongoing challenge of navigating the complex relationship between criticism of a nation-state and prejudice against its people.
Furthermore, there’s a tangible disconnect between the actions of the Israeli government and the ethical principles many American Jews hold dear. The idea of praying for Palestinians and for peace in their weekly Temple services underscores a commitment to humanitarian values that they feel are being violated by Israel. This indicates a strong desire to see a more beautiful and real alternative to what they perceive as the “rot” of current Israeli policies, and a call for a substantial vision for contemporary Judaism that can offer this alternative.
Finally, for some, the sheer brutality and perceived indifference to civilian lives, exemplified by polling data suggesting widespread Israeli support for the forced displacement of Palestinians and a belief that there are “no innocent people in Gaza,” has been a profound catalyst for their disgust. This, coupled with the acknowledgment that Israel has a history of territorial disputes and conflict stretching back before its existence, leads many to believe that the current path is unsustainable and ultimately detrimental to all involved, suggesting that “the great divorce finally happens, the world will become a safer place for all of us.”