By John Q. Hosedrinker 
When questioned about reports of a girls’ school being hit during joint Israeli-U.S. strikes in Iran, President Trump dismissed the claims outright, asserting that Iran was responsible due to its military’s inaccuracy. In contrast, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth indicated that the matter was under investigation, stating that only Iran targets civilians. This divergence in statements led to Hegseth being sidelined, as preliminary assessments from anonymous U.S. officials and independent analysis by The New York Times suggest American forces may have carried out the strike. The incident occurred during the ongoing conflict, which has already resulted in significant casualties, including the deaths of at least 165 schoolgirls.
Read the original article here
The current situation with Donald Trump and Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth has certainly raised a few eyebrows, especially concerning Trump’s rather bold claim about the conflict in Iran. It appears that Hegseth, in a moment of rather public disagreement, wasn’t quite ready to toe the line on Trump’s assertion regarding a school that was hit during joint Israeli-U.S. strikes. When pressed by journalists on Air Force One about reports suggesting the Shajareye Tayabeh girls’ school in Minab was targeted by the U.S., Trump dismissed the idea outright.
Trump’s dismissal came swiftly, even as Hegseth was standing behind him. When a reporter posed the question directly to Hegseth, he offered a more cautious response, stating, “We’re certainly investigating,” and then added, “But the only side that targets civilians is Iran.” This, however, was immediately undercut by Trump himself, who jumped back in to reiterate his belief that Iran was responsible. He then went on to describe the Iranian military as “very inaccurate” in their targeting, effectively suggesting that such an error couldn’t have happened on their end, and therefore, by implication, must have been Iran’s doing.
The incident occurred during the opening salvos of a conflict that was already entering its second week. The Shajareye Tayabeh girls’ school reportedly suffered a devastating strike from three missiles in the early hours of Saturday. The death toll from this particular attack is estimated to be between 165 and 180 people, with the overwhelming majority being young girls aged seven to twelve. Funerals for these young victims were held just a few days later. Adding to the tragedy, Iranian state media also claimed that two additional schools in Parand were struck.
Despite Trump’s firm stance, preliminary assessments from anonymous U.S. officials indicated that American forces might indeed be responsible for the strike. These investigations are, of course, ongoing, and such assessments are considered tentative and subject to change. The New York Times, in its own separate analysis, also concluded that U.S. military action was the “most likely” cause. Their reporting pointed out that the school was located immediately adjacent to an IRGC naval base, which was a confirmed target, and suggested the strike was either a result of a weapons malfunction or a significant intelligence failure.
It’s interesting to note the response from Israel’s UN ambassador, Danny Danon, when questioned about the incident. He stated that Israel “do[es] not target civilians” and acknowledged that “sometimes we have accidents.” While he couldn’t comment on the specific incident, he mentioned that the IDF and U.S. troops were investigating and expressed regret for any civilian loss. This echoes a frequently repeated line from the Israeli government concerning its actions, particularly in areas like Gaza, where significant civilian casualties have occurred during ongoing bombardments.
In the midst of this, the damage to civilian infrastructure in Iran has been substantial. According to UNICEF, at least twenty schools and ten hospitals have been impacted since the commencement of what was dubbed “Operation Epic Fury.” Earlier, Trump had made a self-congratulatory post on Truth Social, promising to continue delivering “hell” to Iran and even mentioning the consideration of previously untargeted areas and groups for “complete destruction.” This aggressive rhetoric, coupled with the conflicting information about the school strike, paints a complex and concerning picture of the ongoing situation.
The White House has maintained a somewhat vague and defensive posture regarding the school strike. When directly asked about U.S. responsibility, the response was “not that I know of.” However, the evidence compiled by publications like The New York Times, including satellite imagery and verified social media content, strongly suggests the school was hit during a U.S. attack on nearby buildings. Pentagon official statements confirmed strikes on an IRGC naval base adjacent to the school. The exact determination of who is responsible for the attack has been complicated by the lack of readily identifiable weapon fragments in satellite images and the inability of independent journalists to access the scene.
National security analysts, including those with experience in the U.S. Air Force and in advising on civilian harm, have suggested that “target misidentification” is the most probable explanation, with the strike teams unaware of civilians within the building. Theories involving faulty Iranian missiles have generally been dismissed, as a single munition would be unlikely to cause such widespread devastation. The contrasting narratives – Trump’s unwavering assertion that Iran is to blame versus the emerging evidence pointing towards U.S. involvement – create a significant disconnect, highlighting the challenges in verifying information during active conflicts and the potential for political figures to shape public perception.