By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite the persistent mythmaking surrounding his persona, a significant portion of the electorate remains unconvinced of his capabilities. Even those not troubled by alleged mendacity and malevolence acknowledge his profound incompetence, a belief seemingly hardwired in a way that election campaigns struggle to undo. This disconnect is evident in continued faith in his economic promises, demonstrating a persistent challenge in shifting established perceptions regarding his fitness for leadership.
Read the original article here
The pervasive myth of Donald Trump’s competence, a narrative carefully constructed and persistently amplified, has left us all footing a significant bill, a price paid not just in dollars and cents, but in the erosion of trust, the exacerbation of global instability, and the deepening of societal divisions. It’s a sobering thought that so many believed in this illusion of competence, particularly when the evidence to the contrary was so readily available and so consistently demonstrated. The notion that he was a masterful businessman, a shrewd negotiator, or an effective leader, despite a track record that often suggested the opposite, became a powerful, albeit flawed, rallying cry.
The allure of this myth, particularly for his fervent supporters, seems to stem from a deeper psychological need: the desire for a protector, for someone who promises simple solutions to complex problems. For those who felt overwhelmed by the intricacies of modern life, the idea of a strongman who could simply “wave his hands and make it so” was incredibly appealing. This sentiment often overlooks the inherent complexity of governing, the delicate balance required in diplomacy, and the nuanced understanding necessary to navigate economic challenges, scientific advancements, and ethical dilemmas. The myth allowed people to feel shielded from responsibility, a feeling that persisted even when confronted with glaring evidence of ineffectual leadership and disastrous policy outcomes.
We are now witnessing the tangible consequences of this widespread delusion. The current global economic shock, with oil prices soaring, is a stark reminder of how deeply interconnected our world is and how vulnerable we are to the ripple effects of erratic decision-making. While American oil companies may report record profits, and some industries might benefit from specific trade reimbursements, the broader impact on the average consumer is undeniably negative. This is the price of choosing a leader whose perceived strength was built on a foundation of fantasy rather than fact.
The continued adherence to the “Trump was competent” narrative, even after significant failures and setbacks, speaks to a broader issue of how such myths are maintained. It highlights a disconnect between public perception and demonstrable reality, a phenomenon that was arguably cultivated by a media landscape that, at times, seemed more focused on sensationalism than on substantive critique. The narrative of Trump as a business guru, amplified by reality television and persistent talking points, took root in the minds of many, leading them to believe that running a country was akin to running a business, and that his particular brand of “business” acumen would translate into effective governance.
The failure to learn from past mistakes is another costly aspect of this myth. The pandemic, for instance, was a period where the lack of competent leadership and the dismissal of scientific expertise had devastating human and economic consequences. Yet, the narrative of competence endured for many, illustrating how deeply ingrained beliefs can be, even when demonstrably wrong. This inability to confront inconvenient truths means we are constantly re-paying the price for past misjudgments, trapped in a cycle of repeating errors.
The notion that Trump was competent was not universally shared, of course. Many, particularly those who were more keenly observant of his actions and rhetoric, saw through the facade from early on. The designation of him as a “crook” or a “failure of a businessman” was not new; it was a persistent observation that seemed to fall on deaf ears for a significant portion of the electorate. The contrast between this perception and the fervent belief of his supporters underscores a profound societal schism, where differing realities are embraced and defended with equal vigor.
The global ramifications are also increasingly apparent. The decision-making that prioritizes the interests of certain individuals over global stability and human lives, and the potential for catastrophic international conflict stemming from misguided foreign policy, are direct costs we are now enduring. The idea that such actions could be considered anything less than “war crimes” or “crimes against humanity” reveals the extent to which the language of political discourse has been distorted to maintain the myth of competence.
Ultimately, the price we are paying for the myth of Trump’s competence is a heavy one. It is a price measured in economic hardship, in diminished global standing, and in the erosion of faith in democratic institutions. The myth’s persistence is a testament to the power of narrative, but its eventual unraveling, and the collective reckoning with its costs, is an inevitable consequence of confronting the unvarnished truth. The challenge now is to move forward, armed with a clearer understanding of reality, and to ensure that future decisions are guided by genuine competence, not by the seductive allure of a dangerous myth.