By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Since the beginning of the decade, Israel has not prosecuted its citizens for killing Palestinian civilians in the occupied West Bank, fostering a climate of impunity for widespread violence. This alarming trend has prompted former prime minister Ehud Olmert to call for international criminal court intervention to address state-backed settler violence, which he claims is aided by Israeli police and military. Senior former Israeli security commanders have also issued a public letter warning that inaction against “Jewish terrorism” poses an existential threat to the nation, highlighting recent incidents where settlers and police have killed multiple Palestinian civilians. Data indicates that since 2020, Israeli soldiers and settlers have killed at least 1,100 Palestinian civilians, with a quarter being children, and no charges have been filed in these cases.
Read the original article here
It’s a stark reality, and a deeply troubling one at that: since the start of this decade, there have been no prosecutions in Israel for the killing of Palestinian civilians in the occupied West Bank. This isn’t a minor oversight or an isolated incident; it’s a pattern that raises profound questions about justice, accountability, and the value placed on human life.
Consider the case of Shireen Abu Akleh, a respected Palestinian-American journalist. In 2022, she was tragically killed by an Israeli sniper in the West Bank. She was clearly identifiable, wearing a bright blue press jacket, and was shot directly in the head. Yet, an Israeli investigation found no wrongdoing. Even more disturbingly, her funeral procession was subsequently attacked by Israeli police who beat the casket bearers with batons. This suggests a systemic issue where investigations into the deaths of Palestinians often conclude without accountability.
This lack of prosecution isn’t limited to specific incidents; it seems to be the norm. The input suggests a sentiment that Israeli crimes are met with little more than a “verbal slap on the wrist,” if that. The implication is that there’s an ingrained belief system, perhaps encapsulated in the phrase “the most moral army in the world,” that shields soldiers and officials from consequences, regardless of the severity of their actions.
The broader context of the occupied West Bank, viewed by some as an area of “violent occupation and extraction,” further complicates the issue. When the state is seen as an “accessory” to facilitate and justify this, it becomes difficult to imagine a scenario where those perpetrating violence against the occupied population would be held accountable. This perspective frames Israel not as a state with a military, but as an army with a state, where the military’s objectives supersede legal and ethical considerations.
The idea that “any life other than Israeli is worthless” is a sentiment that appears to be echoed by the actions and inactions observed. This isn’t just about soldiers; the input also points to settlers as contributing to this climate of impunity, with some even described as “extremist Jewish terrorists” or “settlers in uniform.” The narrative suggests that dual-citizen ethnonationalists are actively encouraged to settle on Palestinian land, exacerbating the conflict and the potential for violence.
The international response, or lack thereof, is also a significant point of discussion. The input criticizes both Democratic and Republican administrations in the US for not adequately addressing these issues, with one perspective suggesting that the difference between the parties was merely about honesty in their lack of care for Palestinians. However, there’s also an observation that this has begun to change, with more voices questioning the relationship with Israel and American support for it showing signs of decline.
Furthermore, the input raises a broader question about the adherence to international law, such as the Geneva Conventions and the ICC. The argument is made that “no one has followed the rules,” citing examples from Russia and Ukraine to Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, and even Israel and the USA. This paints a picture of a global landscape where war crimes and human rights abuses are unfortunately commonplace, and the mechanisms for accountability are often ineffective.
The notion that prosecuting oneself for such actions would be akin to Nazis prosecuting themselves for the Holocaust is a powerful, albeit disturbing, analogy. It suggests a level of self-protection and denial that prevents genuine accountability. The input implies that the very founding principles of the country are intertwined with actions that could be considered “fascist” and “authoritarian.”
The comparison to the US healthcare system, where “billionaires kill thousands of us each year,” highlights a general critique of powerful entities operating with impunity. However, the core focus remains on the situation in the West Bank, where the systematic failure to prosecute those responsible for killing Palestinian civilians is the central grievance.
Ultimately, the recurring theme is the profound lack of accountability for the killing of Palestinian civilians in the occupied West Bank. The input suggests a deep-seated issue within the Israeli system, amplified by a perceived international indifference or ineffectiveness. The hope expressed is that the tide is slowly turning, with more awareness and questioning leading to potential future change, but the present reality, based on the provided input, is one of continued impunity.