An inmate at the Metropolitan Correctional Center has reportedly told the FBI that he overheard prison guards discussing a cover-up of Jeffrey Epstein’s death on the morning he died. The inmate claimed to have heard one guard say, “Dudes, you killed that dude,” followed by a female guard’s response about covering it up if he was dead. This account raises questions about the official ruling of suicide, especially in light of a forensic pathologist’s opinion that Epstein’s injuries were more consistent with strangulation. Additionally, financial records and internet searches by one of the implicated guards have been highlighted, though the inmate’s account has not been substantiated.
Read the original article here
An inmate at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York has told the FBI he overheard prison guards discussing a cover-up of Jeffrey Epstein’s death on the very morning he died. This account, detailed in a five-page handwritten FBI report, has surfaced as part of the growing trove of documents related to the disgraced financier’s case. The inmate reportedly woke up on August 10, 2019, to a significant commotion in the Special Housing Unit, or SHU, where he was being held alongside Epstein.
Around 6:30 a.m., the inmate recalled hearing guards shouting “Breathe! Breathe!” This was followed by an officer’s alarming declaration: “Dudes, you killed that dude.” The gravity of this statement was amplified when a female guard reportedly responded, “If he is dead, we’re going to cover it up and he’s going to have an alibi — my officers.” According to the inmate’s testimony, this entire exchange was audible throughout the wing.
Later, after the news of Epstein’s death spread among the inmates, whispers of “Miss Noel killed Jeffrey” began circulating. The inmate identified the female guard in the overheard conversation as Tova Noel. Noel, along with another correctional officer, Michael Thomas, was subsequently charged with falsifying records to make it appear they had conducted their required rounds that night, when in fact, they had not. Although the charges against both officers were eventually dropped, they were both terminated from their positions.
The FBI report’s details are likely to fuel further speculation and suspicion surrounding Epstein’s demise. Adding to this, a report highlighted a notable event involving Tova Noel: her bank flagged a $5,000 cash deposit made to her Chase Bank account on July 30, 2019. This deposit occurred just a week after Epstein was found unresponsive in his cell on July 23, 2019, in what prison officials ruled as a suicide attempt.
Further complicating matters, the same report indicated that on the morning of Epstein’s death, Tova Noel conducted internet searches for “latest on Epstein in jail” on two separate occasions, at 5:42 a.m. and again at 5:52 a.m. These searches took place approximately 40 minutes before Epstein was discovered by Officer Michael Thomas.
Noel’s bank records, which are part of the official files, also revealed a pattern of receiving thousands of dollars in cash and Zelle payments in the months leading up to Epstein’s death. These financial records additionally showed that Noel was making payments on a brand new Range Rover, a detail that has drawn significant attention given the circumstances.
The inmate’s testimony suggests a profound lack of oversight and potential misconduct within the correctional facility. The idea that guards would openly discuss a cover-up, particularly in a way that was overheard by numerous inmates, raises serious questions about the integrity of the investigation and the prison’s internal protocols. The fact that the inmate claims the entire wing overheard the conversation lends weight to the possibility that these statements were not fabricated but rather genuine, albeit alarming, admissions.
The narrative presented by the inmate, combined with the financial and digital footprints of Tova Noel, paints a picture that many find difficult to reconcile with the official account of Epstein’s death. The timing of her searches and the substantial cash deposits, along with the purchase of a luxury vehicle, have all been cited as evidence of suspicious activity that warranted deeper scrutiny. The notion that a prison environment, often characterized by its strict rules and surveillance, could harbor such alleged complicity and cover-up is deeply troubling.
The question of why Tova Noel and Michael Thomas are not facing more direct questioning or congressional inquiry remains a significant point of contention for many observers. While they were fired and faced initial charges, the subsequent dropping of those charges and their subsequent departures from the federal prison system have left many unsatisfied. The public’s demand for transparency and accountability in a case as high-profile and fraught with unanswered questions as Jeffrey Epstein’s continues to grow, fueled by each new piece of information that emerges from the case files.
