By John Q. Hosedrinker 
As part of an ongoing investigation into claims of widespread fraud, a federal grand jury in Arizona has subpoenaed records related to a Republican lawmakers’ review of the 2020 presidential election results. This review, which confirmed that President Donald Trump lost the election, marks a new development in the administration’s efforts to uncover evidence to support these unproven claims. Law enforcement actions have raised concerns among election officials and Democrats, who worry about potential interference in upcoming midterm elections.
Read the original article here
The FBI’s recent acquisition of voting data from the Arizona Republican Party’s 2020 election review offers a significant, albeit unsurprising, development in the ongoing scrutiny of that election’s integrity. This data, collected during a review that ultimately confirmed Joe Biden’s victory, now rests with federal investigators, potentially shedding light on the processes and claims surrounding the contentious election.
It appears that efforts to re-examine the 2020 results in Arizona, despite multiple audits and reviews confirming the outcome, have inadvertently provided the FBI with a detailed look into the very data that underscored President Trump’s defeat. This is particularly noteworthy because these reviews, including those conducted by firms like Cyber Ninjas, were initiated with the explicit intention of finding evidence of fraud that would overturn the election results.
The fact that these reviews, however flawed or biased their initial intent, consistently concluded that Biden won more votes than originally counted, makes the FBI’s possession of this data all the more interesting. It suggests that the federal agency is now examining the same information that the Arizona GOP and their hired contractors presented, information that, ironically, reaffirmed the accuracy of the original vote count.
This situation raises questions about what the FBI intends to do with this data, especially given the persistent claims of widespread fraud from former President Trump and his allies. The data itself, having been collected and analyzed by entities seeking to prove a different outcome, now serves as a point of reference for federal investigators.
It’s almost as if the very process undertaken to find fault inadvertently created a comprehensive record that confirms the election’s integrity. The irony is palpable: the efforts to uncover fraud, when meticulously documented, ended up reinforcing the legitimacy of the electoral process.
Furthermore, this development occurs amidst broader concerns about the efforts of certain groups to influence future elections. Reports have surfaced about individuals associated with efforts to overturn the 2020 election participating in summits aimed at shaping upcoming electoral strategies. The FBI’s access to this specific Arizona data could therefore be seen as part of a larger investigation into actions that may have sought to undermine democratic processes.
The involvement of figures like Cleta Mitchell, an advisor to former President Trump and a participant in calls to “find votes,” adds another layer to this narrative. Her known role in challenging election results suggests a continued engagement with the very processes that the FBI is now scrutinizing.
The very concept of “fixing future elections,” as discussed in some circles, makes the FBI’s current actions particularly relevant. By obtaining the data from a review that confirmed a loss, the agency is examining the groundwork upon which claims of impropriety were built, and which, in this instance, failed to yield the desired results for those challenging the outcome.
It is also important to note the particular firm, Cyber Ninjas, which was hired for the Arizona audit and later dissolved. The idea that such a company was tasked with searching for what many considered unsubstantiated claims, like “bamboo fibers” on ballots, highlights the unusual nature of these post-election reviews. The FBI now possesses the data generated by such efforts.
For those who have followed these developments closely, the FBI obtaining voting data from a review that *confirmed* Trump’s loss is not entirely surprising, but rather a logical next step in understanding the extent of efforts to challenge election results. It underscores the fact that, at least in this specific Arizona case, the attempts to find irregularities ultimately proved unsuccessful in altering the documented outcome.
The ongoing saga of election challenges and reviews seems to be a recurring theme, with repeated attempts to find evidence of fraud that have consistently been disproven by the very data collected. This situation in Arizona, with the FBI now in possession of the data, serves as another chapter in this ongoing narrative, one where the evidence, when examined through a rigorous and impartial lens, continues to point towards the accuracy of the original election results.