By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Britain’s data watchdog has fined Reddit £14.5 million for failing to adequately protect children’s personal data and for not conducting a required risk assessment before January 2025. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) found that the platform unlawfully collected and used the personal information of children under 13, potentially exposing them to harmful content. While Reddit prohibits users under 13, it lacked age verification measures until July 2025, leading to children’s data being processed without their understanding or consent. The company intends to appeal this decision, which stems from an investigation launched in March 2025 into Reddit’s age assurance and data usage practices.
Read the original article here
The U.K. has handed down a significant fine to Reddit, to the tune of nearly US$20 million, over serious failures in protecting children’s data. This hefty penalty underscores a growing global concern about how online platforms handle the sensitive information of their youngest users. It appears the platform’s practices have fallen short of regulatory expectations, leading to this substantial financial consequence.
Reddit, in its defense, has publicly stated a strong commitment to user privacy and safety, asserting that they do not require users to share identifying information, regardless of age. This stance is presented as a core principle of their operation, aimed at safeguarding individuals. However, the U.K.’s regulatory body has clearly found these assurances and their implementation to be insufficient when it comes to protecting children.
The investigation and subsequent fine suggest that, despite Reddit’s stated intentions, there were significant gaps in their data protection protocols concerning minors. This raises questions about the effectiveness of their internal safeguards and whether their privacy policies were adequately enforced in practice, particularly in identifying and protecting underage users.
The timing of this fine, occurring shortly after Reddit’s initial public offering (IPO), has sparked discussion about its potential impact on investor confidence and whether this regulatory scrutiny was anticipated by the company or its shareholders. It’s a stark reminder that financial markets and regulatory compliance are intrinsically linked, and past actions can have immediate and costly repercussions.
Some viewpoints expressed suggest that the focus on fines alone might not be the most effective solution for genuinely protecting children. There’s a sentiment that governments should perhaps invest more in offline resources and safe spaces for children, rather than solely focusing on digital regulation, which can sometimes lead to overly restrictive measures.
The notion of implementing age verification systems, while intended to protect children, has also been met with skepticism. Concerns are raised about the potential for these systems to become overly intrusive, requiring extensive personal identification that could be misused. The idea of a “crypto equivalent” for age verification, akin to festival wristbands, has been proposed as a more privacy-conscious alternative, aiming to verify age without collecting unnecessary personal data.
However, the practicalities of such cryptographic solutions are complex and have been questioned, with proponents suggesting that existing technologies like Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) could be leveraged more effectively. The underlying concern remains: how to verify age without creating new vulnerabilities or mandating the collection of excessive personal information.
There’s also a broader criticism that such fines, while substantial, can be seen as merely a “cost of doing business” for large tech companies like Reddit. The argument is that the financial penalty might be less than the cost of implementing robust preventative measures, leading to a cycle where fines are paid, but fundamental issues are not fully addressed.
Furthermore, the discussion has touched upon past instances where social media platforms, including Reddit, have reportedly shared user data with government agencies, even in cases involving users critical of government policies. This raises significant concerns about the potential for data collected under the guise of child protection to be repurposed for other surveillance or data-gathering activities.
The suggestion that Reddit is “deeply committed to their privacy and safety” is being juxtaposed with reports of the platform complying with requests for user information from agencies like the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This apparent contradiction fuels skepticism about the true nature of data handling practices.
The evolution of signup processes on platforms like Reddit, now sometimes requiring phone numbers, further highlights the trend towards increased data collection, which is often justified by the need for enhanced security and age verification. This shift is viewed by some as a gradual erosion of online privacy.
Ultimately, the U.K.’s substantial fine against Reddit serves as a critical juncture, prompting a wider conversation about the balance between online safety, user privacy, and the evolving responsibilities of social media platforms in protecting vulnerable populations. The effectiveness of regulatory penalties and the search for genuinely privacy-preserving age verification methods remain at the forefront of this ongoing debate.