By John Q. Hosedrinker 
UK bank bosses are set to convene for their inaugural meeting to establish a national alternative to dominant payment systems like Visa and Mastercard. This initiative, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to US-owned payment networks, aims to ensure the UK economy’s resilience. The proposed system, known as DeliveryCo, will be City-funded and government-backed, with the goal of being operational by 2030. While past discussions highlighted the need for a sovereign payment system, recent geopolitical tensions have amplified these concerns, underscoring the vulnerability of a near-complete reliance on foreign-owned infrastructure for the vast majority of UK card transactions.
Read the original article here
A significant shift is underway in the UK’s financial landscape, as major banks are reportedly planning to develop an alternative to the dominant Visa and Mastercard payment networks. This bold initiative, described as a move to counteract potential economic instability stemming from political actions in the United States, has been met with considerable enthusiasm and a sense of long-overdue necessity. The driving force behind this ambitious project isn’t solely governmental, but critically, it’s being funded by the very banks themselves, who perceive a lack of such an independent system as an existential threat in the current geopolitical climate.
The prevailing sentiment is that Visa and Mastercard have long enjoyed a de facto monopoly, and the increasing unpredictability of international relations, particularly concerning the United States, necessitates a strategic decoupling. This concern is amplified by the prospect of a US administration potentially wielding economic power in a retaliatory manner, prompting a need for robust backups to ensure the continued functioning of economies, both within the UK and across Europe. The idea of creating a homegrown payment system is not a new one in principle, with some European countries having established alternatives to Visa for decades, hinting at a blueprint for success that others could follow.
The inspiration for this UK initiative appears to be drawn from successful implementations in other parts of the world, notably Brazil’s Pix system and Mexico’s recent adoption of a similar central bank-run payment method. Pix, in particular, has been a runaway success, rapidly becoming the preferred method for electronic payments in Brazil, accounting for a substantial majority of transactions. This demonstrated efficacy has not gone unnoticed by major financial players, including the European Central Bank, which is also exploring options to reduce dependency on US-based financial infrastructure. The potential loss of market share for Visa and Mastercard in these significant economies is a clear indicator of the viability and appeal of independent payment solutions.
There’s a strong desire within the UK to align with European efforts in this regard, reflecting a broader trend of reducing reliance on US technology and financial services. However, the precise nature of this collaboration is a subject of discussion. While some advocate for a closer integration with existing European payment initiatives, others emphasize the importance of the UK maintaining its own sovereign capabilities, especially given its current non-member status within the EU. The concern is that political considerations could complicate any formal integration, making an independent UK solution a more prudent and secure path forward, particularly in light of the volatility introduced by political shifts.
The initiative aims to establish a payment system that is not necessarily a direct competitor to credit card offerings but rather focuses on direct debit or account-to-account transfers, similar to Canada’s Interac system. This distinction is crucial, as it addresses the core concern of having an independent clearing and settlement mechanism rather than solely focusing on credit facilities. While some express a preference for the added layer of protection offered by credit cards in the event of fraud, the emphasis is on creating a robust, self-sufficient payment infrastructure. The concept of “Wero,” a European payment initiative, is also being discussed as a potential avenue for integration or inspiration, highlighting a multi-faceted approach to building a more resilient payment ecosystem.
The strategic implications of such a move are far-reaching. The establishment of viable alternatives to Visa and Mastercard could significantly diminish the leverage held by these dominant players, potentially impacting the US dollar’s position as the world’s reserve currency over the long term. The recognition of this potential shift is prompting other nations, including Canada, to re-evaluate their own payment infrastructures and explore the export of successful domestic systems like Interac. The overall sentiment is one of cautious optimism, with a clear understanding that this is a critical step towards greater financial autonomy and security in an increasingly uncertain global economic environment. The success of this UK-led initiative could very well pave the way for a more diversified and decentralized global payment landscape, moving away from the long-standing duopoly that has shaped the way we transact for decades.