By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Reports from eastern Democratic Republic of Congo indicate the M23 armed group has detained American national Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater. Prince was allegedly arrested earlier this week in Uvira, reportedly accompanying a coalition of forces that had re-entered the city. Sources claim Prince, along with his security detail, was taken from a hotel to an undisclosed location. The M23 coalition has not confirmed or denied these allegations.
Read the original article here
The rumor mill has been buzzing with claims from a Tutsi rebel group stating that Erik Prince has been kidnapped in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). This development, emerging around February 8-9, 2026, has sparked a flurry of speculation and commentary, given Prince’s well-known involvement in private military contracting and his alleged role in supporting the Congolese army in the region.
The reports specifically point to the M23 rebel group as the purported captors. This comes at a time when Prince’s private security forces were reportedly assisting the Congolese army in efforts to reclaim the strategically important city of Uvira. While some local news outlets and social media have amplified these claims, it’s important to note that as of February 10, 2026, there has been no verified report from any African government confirming Prince’s arrest or official detention.
The context of Prince’s presence in the DRC is a key piece of the puzzle. Reports from sources like Reuters confirm that Prince had indeed deployed personnel and drones to aid the Congolese government forces on the frontlines. This direct involvement in an active conflict zone raises many questions about his personal safety and the potential ramifications of such an incident.
Understandably, the news has generated a mixed reaction, ranging from disbelief to fervent hope that the claims are true. Many find the idea of Erik Prince, the architect behind private military operations, finding himself in such a situation rather astonishing. The inherent irony of the “super-rich guy *running* the private security/mercenary business” potentially facing danger, especially when his business model often involves others facing the risks, is not lost on commentators.
There’s a significant degree of skepticism surrounding the credibility of the Tutsi rebel group as a source, with some highlighting their own controversial history in the region. This inherent distrust naturally fuels the demand for concrete proof, with some even humorously suggesting traditional methods of verification. The underlying sentiment for many is that if this incident is indeed true, it might be a case of “as you sow, so shall you reap,” suggesting a karmic reckoning for Prince’s past actions.
The financial implications, however facetious, have also been brought up, with people jokingly asking how much it would cost to have him kept by the rebels, or suggesting donations to a “keep him” fund. The idea that the “world would be so improved by his absence” is a sentiment echoed by many who clearly hold a negative view of Prince and his endeavors.
Questions have also been raised about his personal involvement on the ground. If he is indeed involved in directing operations, why would he be in a city reportedly controlled by the opposing side? The assumption is that if he has been detained, it would be by the rival faction, which then begs the question of his decision-making in placing himself in such a precarious position.
For those who are familiar with Erik Prince and his business dealings, the news, while unconfirmed, has been met with a degree of dark amusement and a surprising amount of enthusiasm for his potential predicament. The overall tone suggests that for many, Erik Prince is not a figure to be sympathized with, and his absence, in any capacity, would be seen as a positive development. The lack of credible reporting beyond initial social media and local news outlets makes this a developing story, but the reactions it has already elicited paint a stark picture of public perception.