By John Q. Hosedrinker 
This article details how the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) opposed Representative Andy Malinowski for supporting conditions on aid to Israel, a stance increasingly popular among Democrats due to public disapproval of Israel’s actions in Gaza. The article then introduces Misty Mejia, a progressive candidate endorsed by prominent figures like Senator Sanders, who is poised to benefit from AIPAC’s opposition. Mejia’s position on the conflict is more extreme than Malinowski’s, as she has characterized the situation in Gaza as genocide and refused any AIPAC-funded trips to Israel, mirroring a successful strategy seen in a previous New York mayoral campaign.
Read the original article here
It seems the much-touted Trump prescription drug website, officially known as TrumpRx, has been exposed as, well, another colossal con. The core of the alleged scam appears to be in its deceptive claims about cost savings. Far from offering genuine discounts, it’s being reported that many, if not all, of the supposed “deals” are readily available through the drug manufacturers themselves, completely bypassing the need for TrumpRx. This revelation has naturally led to a wave of disbelief mixed with a weary sense of “told you so.” The idea that a venture bearing the Trump name might be anything less than transparent and genuinely beneficial is, for many, an almost incomprehensible notion, despite a rather extensive track record suggesting otherwise.
The immediate reaction from many observers is one of profound, almost performative, shock. The suggestion that “Don the Con” would engage in fraudulent activity is met with a sarcastic disbelief that highlights a cynical expectation. The narrative quickly coalesces around the idea that the website offers no real assistance and is, in essence, a hollow shell, a typical Trump maneuver. The prediction that “MAGA will love it” is laced with heavy sarcasm, underscoring a perceived blindness to such schemes among supporters. This sentiment is echoed by others who express no surprise, noting that the first clue to any potential problem was, quite simply, the inclusion of the word “Trump.”
The speed at which this news is being met with outrage and commentary is striking. Some express disbelief that such a thing could happen so quickly, while others are resigned to the predictable pattern of what they see as ongoing scams. The notion that not everything is “1000% off” is presented as a rhetorical question highlighting the perceived gullibility of some. The recurring theme is that anyone associating with this venture is likely to fall victim to another Trump-branded scam, joining a list that includes past endeavors like Trump Phones, Trump Homes, Trump Steaks, and the infamous Trump University. A clear warning of “Buyer beware” is implicitly, and often explicitly, being issued.
Digging into the specifics, the offer details for medications like Ozempic® paint a picture of an initial promotional price followed by a significant increase. For instance, new self-pay patients might pay $199 for the first two monthly fills of Ozempic® at certain dosages, only to face a jump to $349 or even $499 per month after the promotional period. This structure raises questions about the true long-term value proposition. Furthermore, it’s pointed out that similar medications, particularly generic versions, might be available for considerably less on other platforms, such as Mark Cuban’s prescription site. A strong suggestion is made to always check insurance copays, implying that existing insurance plans could offer better savings than this new initiative.
TrumpRx is characterized as merely a third-party platform, a PBM (Pharmacy Benefit Manager), for a wide array of 43 different drugs. This description strips away any pretense of innovation or a unique solution. The underlying accusation is that, if there’s one consistent trait associated with anything bearing the Trump name, it’s the design to enrich the individual at the expense of others. This sweeping condemnation extends beyond the website, touching upon deeply held negative opinions about the individual himself. The sentiment is clear: the website is just another example of this alleged pattern of self-enrichment.
The repetition of the phrase “Another Trump scam? Shocking!” underscores a widespread perception that this is not an isolated incident but rather a predictable outcome. The observation that “Everything Trump does is a scam and a lot of people eat it up lol” captures a sense of exasperated amusement at the apparent continued success of such ventures despite criticism. The list of past “scams” – Trump College, Trump Watches, Trump Bibles, and Trump Shoes – is brought up as evidence of this recurring pattern. Sarcasm is heavily employed, with phrases like “No, I don’t believe it. /s” serving to highlight the absurdity of expressing surprise at this point.
The timing of such an initiative is also questioned, with some suggesting it’s a desperate attempt to bolster Republican chances in upcoming elections. The assertion that “Anything he peddles is a scam” is a blunt assessment, and the claim that “Any time he opens his mouth, it is either a scam or a lie” reflects a deeply entrenched distrust. A significant piece of information emerges: a pharmacist allegedly reported that the website is essentially a re-skin of GoodRx, utilizing the same discount codes and prices. This direct comparison to an established platform that offers similar savings without the Trump association further fuels the notion of a scam.
The idea that a venture under Trump’s name would involve deception is so ingrained that it’s barely considered news anymore by some. The comparison to “Melania-coin” and the actual selling of Trump’s clothing shreds highlights a belief that any product or service associated with the Trump brand is ripe for exploitation. The link provided to GoodRx’s investor relations page, which confirms their partnership in powering TrumpRx’s pricing, solidifies the claim that this isn’t a novel savings mechanism but rather a co-opted one. The government’s approach to the website’s registration is also scrutinized, with the short one-year domain registration for a .gov website being flagged as suspicious and potentially indicative of a short-term “con” rather than a long-term government initiative.
The implication that this is being done “at the taxpayers expense” adds another layer of concern, suggesting a potential misuse of public resources or a creation of something that benefits private interests through government channels. The question posed, “Are you saying Trump has created a program under his own name where he’s able to take credit and probable financial gain for a product or service that doesn’t live up to its promise?!?” is a rhetorical device to emphasize the perceived audacity of such an alleged scheme. The phrase “GOVERNMENT SPONSORED GRIFT for the enrichment of Trump and his crony donors from the pharmaceutical industry!!” encapsulates the most damning accusation.
The term “Fraud running wild with Trump” and the description of him as a “fucking awful lying POS… exploiting the already exploited” convey a visceral anger and frustration. The repeated, almost weary, lament of “Oh no. I never could have seen that coming….” serves as a sarcastic expression of the predictability of these alleged scams. The sentiment that “Everything he’s done is predictable” leads to a call for legislative action, suggesting a need for laws that prevent politicians from attaching their names to commercial ventures. The question of whether this is even “news anymore” signifies how expected such events have become.
The contrast with the Biden administration’s efforts, specifically the Inflation Reduction Act’s negotiation of prescription drug prices, is stark. While the Biden administration is credited with establishing a mechanism for Medicare to negotiate, leading to actual savings on specific medications, the Trump administration is portrayed as offering “side shows and distractions” with no tangible accomplishments. The conclusion drawn is that this latest venture is “Just another scam that will go bankrupt,” and the fact that it’s presented as a “hands off operation” only adds to the skepticism, suggesting an attempt to distance himself from potential fallout while still reaping rewards.