By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump’s racist rhetoric and policies, exemplified by his criticism of a Spanish-language performance and his administration’s approach to refugees and the EEOC, demonstrate a consistent pattern of divisive actions. While past electoral successes suggested these views might not be a political impediment, the article argues that Trump’s failure to deliver on economic promises is now causing him to lose support across racial lines. Democrats are therefore positioned to highlight his racism, arguing it undermines economic prosperity, while Republicans with diverse coalitions need to distance themselves from his legacy.
Read the original article here
The persistent notion that Donald Trump is fundamentally racist is not a new revelation; rather, it’s a conclusion that seems to have solidified over decades, supported by a consistent pattern of behavior and rhetoric. From his earliest business dealings to his most recent public pronouncements, the evidence often points towards a deeply ingrained prejudice.
Even in the 1970s, the Department of Justice took action, suing Donald Trump, his father, and Trump Management for violating fair housing laws and discriminating against Black renters. This legal challenge, which resulted in a settlement, foreshadowed later accusations of discriminatory practices. Fast forward to the 1980s, and a former employee at Trump’s Castle reportedly recalled an unsettling directive: when Donald and Ivana Trump visited the casino, Black staff members were allegedly removed from the floor and sent to the back. This anecdote, if accurate, paints a picture of a workplace environment steeped in racial bias, reminiscent of a much earlier era.
The infamous “Central Park Five” case brought Trump’s views into sharp national focus. While four Black teenagers were wrongly accused and convicted of a brutal assault, Trump took out a full-page advertisement in local newspapers, vociferously demanding the death penalty and a heavier police presence. Even after DNA evidence later exonerated the five, leading to the vacating of their convictions, Trump notably never apologized. To this day, he has often maintained his belief in their guilt, a stance that many view as a stark example of his persistent prejudice and a refusal to acknowledge racial injustice.
Further accounts from within his own businesses have corroborated these concerns. A former president of Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino described Trump making deeply offensive remarks about a Black accountant, questioning his ability to handle money and attributing laziness to Black people as a group. Trump himself later reportedly acknowledged the truth of some of these damaging claims attributed to him. The casino itself faced scrutiny and had to pay a significant fine for allegedly shifting Black and women dealers away from tables to cater to the prejudices of a VIP gambler.
The “birtherism” movement, which Trump heavily promoted, questioning President Obama’s birthplace and thus his legitimacy as president, is widely seen as having racist undertones. This campaign, which Trump actively participated in and claimed to have investigated himself, targeted not only Obama but also figures like Kamala Harris, suggesting a deep-seated skepticism and hostility towards minority figures in positions of power. His insinuations that a Black man could not have achieved admission to prestigious institutions like Columbia or Harvard Law based on merit further fuel the perception of his prejudiced views.
The notorious “shithole countries” remark, used to describe African and predominantly Black nations, is another stark example. This statement, widely condemned as racist and xenophobic, reveals a condescending and demeaning attitude towards entire continents and their populations. His hesitations, or outright refusals, to unequivocally condemn white supremacist groups, exemplified by his infamous “stand back and stand by” comment, have been interpreted as tacit approval or at least a reluctance to alienate those with extremist ideologies. The retweeting of posts from prominent white nationalists and neo-Nazis during his presidential campaign adds further weight to this concern.
His “law and order” rhetoric has frequently been criticized for employing racist “dog whistles” – coded language that appeals to racial biases without explicitly stating them. He is also accused of consistently stereotyping Black people in public, raising questions about his private conversations and attitudes. Leading figures within white supremacist movements have often lauded Trump, sometimes referring to him as their voice or leader, a testament to how his words and actions are perceived by those with explicitly racist agendas.
Adding to this disturbing pattern, Ivana Trump reportedly told her lawyer in the 1990s that Donald kept Hitler’s speeches by his bedside. While this is a secondhand account, it contributes to a broader narrative of concerning associations. Reports have also surfaced of Trump making derogatory comments about immigrants from Haiti, attributing AIDS to them, and making similarly disparaging remarks about Nigerian immigrants. His directive to Black and brown members of Congress to “go back” to the countries they came from is a textbook example of xenophobic and racist rhetoric.
Even within the context of his reality television shows, Trump has faced accusations of racism. On “The Apprentice,” he reportedly fired a Black contestant for being “overeducated,” implying they were unqualified despite their academic achievements. In another instance, a different Black contestant was fired, with Trump citing them as being “inarticulate,” suggesting a bias in how he perceives and evaluates Black individuals. These instances, while seemingly smaller in scope, contribute to a consistent theme of discriminatory behavior.
The cumulative effect of these numerous examples is a powerful indictment. The assertion that Donald Trump is racist is not based on a single incident or interpretation, but on a long and well-documented history. His actions and words, across various domains of his public and private life, have consistently demonstrated a pattern of prejudice that affects not only Black people but also other minority groups, including Arabs, Latinos, Asians, Mexicans, and Muslims. The sheer volume and consistency of these accusations suggest that the issue is not a matter of misinterpretation, but a reflection of deeply held beliefs and behaviors. The idea that this is somehow “news” to many, even after decades of evidence, speaks to a troubling aspect of public discourse and the willingness, or unwillingness, of segments of the population to confront uncomfortable truths about their leaders.