By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite claims of record-high poll numbers, recent surveys indicate a decline in public approval for the president. Even within pro-Trump media outlets, approval ratings hover around the mid-40s, with a majority expressing dissatisfaction with the current state of the economy and the country. These unfavorable numbers could pose significant challenges for the Republican party in upcoming midterm elections, potentially jeopardizing their control of both the House and Senate.
Read the original article here
It appears there’s a sentiment that Donald Trump, at 79, is exhibiting a peculiar form of self-comfort through boasts about polling numbers, particularly as potential electoral difficulties loom for the GOP in the upcoming November elections. The prevailing concern is that widespread voter dissatisfaction with the president could lead to significant losses for the Republican party, potentially impacting both the House and the Senate.
This feeling of unease is palpable, with many observing that Trump’s reliance on what are described as “weird polling brags” seems more like a desperate attempt to soothe himself rather than a reflection of genuine political strength. It’s as if he’s constructing an alternative reality where the numbers tell a story of overwhelming support, a stark contrast to the external indicators of public sentiment.
The input suggests a deep unhappiness with the current administration, which is seen as directly jeopardizing the Republican party’s chances in November. The prediction is stark: the GOP could very well lose control of both chambers of Congress, a significant shift that would signal a resounding rejection of the current political landscape by the electorate.
This sentiment is amplified by concerns about the integrity of the electoral process itself. There’s a pervasive worry that Republican efforts might extend beyond persuasion to more questionable tactics, such as gerrymandering and “rigging,” to maintain power. The idea that legal votes could be challenged and that the outcome might be manipulated is a recurring theme, raising anxieties about the very foundations of democratic elections.
The notion that “millions of illegals voted” is anticipated as a key talking point for Republicans seeking to delegitimize results, a strategy that some believe will be employed to undermine the votes of actual citizens. This, in turn, could lead to a deluge of legal challenges, placing immense pressure on institutions like the Supreme Court to determine the fate of democracy itself.
The idea of Republican officeholders banking on economic benefits from legislation to boost their prospects is met with skepticism. Instead, the focus remains on the negative perception of the current presidency, with some suggesting that the Republican brand has become so tarnichas that it’s akin to a toxic entity, having seemingly discarded core American values.
The comparison of current Republican actions to historical examples of denial and the acceleration of destructive policies in the face of impending collapse is a particularly strong indictment, suggesting a profound lack of self-awareness and a dangerous commitment to a failing course. This comparison, while extreme, highlights the depth of concern among those who view the current trajectory as fundamentally destructive.
The observation that Trump doesn’t seem to care about the average person’s needs – basic necessities like clean air, water, affordability, global friendships, and safety – is a significant point of contention. It’s argued that he has failed on all these fronts, and people are beginning to recognize and feel this failure, regardless of their political affiliation.
The fear that Republican politicians are more afraid of Trump than they are of their country is a recurring and concerning theme. This alleged subservience is seen as preventing effective opposition, even from the Democratic side, with the implication that even moderately competent Democratic leadership would make the current situation a non-issue.
The insistence on election results not reflecting the “win” he “knows” he has in certain states is described as tiring, suggesting a persistent disconnect from reality that is exhausting for observers. This is framed as a form of “peak self-soothing” when polls already show unfavorable numbers, demonstrating a concerning inability to accept objective reality.
The prediction that the GOP will lose the House and potentially the Senate is a strong one, with further speculation about impeachment proceedings beginning in January should Democrats gain control. The idea that enough Republicans might side with Democrats to convict Trump and remove him from office is presented as a possible outcome, with hypothetical scenarios of future Republican presidential candidacies being explored.
There’s a clear sentiment that the Republican party has become a toxic brand, so intrinsically linked to Trump that it’s seen as a liability. The argument is made that Americans are poised to abandon the party because it has lost its trustworthiness, with a cautionary note also directed at establishment Democrats who are also seen as potentially unpopular.
The description of Trump living in an “inverted reality,” where his beliefs are divorced from actual facts, is a consistent characterization. This narcissistic trait is seen as central to his behavior and his inability to acknowledge the negative consequences of his actions or the widespread unhappiness with his presidency.
The idea of impeaching figures like Vance and even Trump if Democrats gain control of Congress is a discussed possibility, representing a desire to “clean out the rot.” However, there’s also a sense of doubt about whether political actors will possess the “balls” to take such decisive action.
The assessment that some individuals within the government are “nihilistic vandals” who are structurally destroying society is a harsh but potent description of the perceived damage being inflicted. Even if these individuals are removed from power, the argument is that the repair will take decades.
The comparison to the actions of German personnel during the Holocaust, in the final stages of the war, is a deeply disturbing one. It illustrates a perceived moral bankruptcy and a desperate acceleration of destructive tasks even when facing inevitable defeat, a chilling parallel drawn by some observers.
The expectation of a “caravan” of immigrants appearing in October is raised as a potentially manufactured crisis, a tactic that could be used to influence the election. This points to a distrust of how political events might be manipulated for electoral gain.
The suggestion that a poll might have focused on how badly someone “smells” rather than their political acumen highlights the perceived absurdity and irrelevance of some of the self-aggrandizing statements being made. It’s a colorful way of expressing the disconnect between Trump’s self-perception and the reality of public opinion.
The observation that Trump surrounds himself with “yes men” who are too afraid to offer genuine feedback is a classic characteristic of autocratic leadership, preventing any form of reality check. This makes the idea of him accurately assessing his own standing even more improbable.
The point that even Biden, who faced criticism, was still getting hammered in the polls, whereas Trump, with less to show, faces a potentially rougher midterm, underscores the depth of animosity directed towards Trump. It suggests a level of personal dislike that transcends policy disagreements.
The claim that “The Democratic party ever received” Trump as their “greatest gift” is a provocative statement, implying that his presence and actions have inadvertently benefited their political cause by alienating voters from the Republican party. This is a sentiment echoed by many who see his influence as ultimately detrimental to the GOP.
The framing of the situation as “self-soothing” in the face of looming disaster is a powerful interpretation. It captures the essence of someone trying to convince themselves that all is well, even when the evidence suggests otherwise, a behavior often associated with deep insecurity and a fear of failure.