By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Recent national polls indicate a troubling trend for Donald Trump as he has slipped into negative territory with white voters. Both the Marquette Law School Supreme Court Poll and a New York Times/Siena College poll found that a majority of white adults disapprove of Trump’s job performance. This shift is significant because white voters have historically formed the core of Trump’s electoral coalition, and its weakening suggests a potential impact on future election outcomes.
Read the original article here
The notion that Donald Trump’s approval rating is currently “underwater” with white voters is a significant point of discussion, suggesting a shift in a demographic that has historically been a bedrock of his support. It’s interesting to consider that what might seem like a dramatic drop for some is still a concerningly high number for others, highlighting the deeply divided political landscape. The idea that a populist movement might confuse volume with genuine growth is a recurring theme, and it seems the Trump movement might be experiencing such a phenomenon, where vocal support doesn’t necessarily translate into sustained, widespread approval, even within his core demographic.
The erosion of support among white voters, while perhaps not stemming from a sudden change in their core values, appears to be a product of sheer exhaustion. The constant state of crisis, which might initially galvanize supporters, can over time transform from a sense of urgency into an irritating distraction. This feeling of weariness, rather than a fundamental ideological shift, seems to be a key factor in the reported decline. It suggests that the sustained intensity of his presidency, marked by continuous controversies, has begun to fatigue even those who were initially drawn to the fervor.
Interestingly, this phenomenon is not entirely new; it mirrors cycles seen in other populist movements. The idea that Trump’s approval with white voters was deeply negative from the outset, perhaps even “bottom of the ocean,” is a striking metaphor for the perceived challenges he faces in retaining that crucial demographic. The constant reporting on approval numbers, often from sources like Newsweek, can feel like a repetitive narrative, but a genuine dip in approval within the white demographic would indeed be a notable development, signaling a potential vulnerability.
While a decline in approval among white voters is a significant indicator, it doesn’t automatically equate to a surge in support for the opposition. The dynamics of voter behavior are complex, and people may disapprove of a candidate without necessarily committing to an alternative. However, the fact that his approval has fallen so drastically from initial highs, perhaps even over 50% early on, is a testament to how quickly the initial excitement has faded and the predicted “shit show” has materialized for many.
The question of Trump’s economic performance also seems to be a contributing factor to his declining standing. When promises of economic prosperity fail to materialize for the working class, it can alienate voters who were banking on those improvements. This economic dissatisfaction, combined with other factors, appears to be pushing some white voters to re-evaluate their support, even if they are described as being “slow” to do so after years of what has been termed “madness and chaos.”
The comparison to historical instances, like the violence perpetrated by extremist groups that ultimately undermined their own cause, offers another perspective. It suggests that the actions and the rhetoric associated with Trump and his movement, particularly when perceived as extreme, can alienate even those who might have shared certain desires for dominance but were not comfortable with outright bloodshed or overt displays of hate. This can inadvertently pave the way for shifts in public opinion, even among those who are not necessarily progressive.
The significant swing in Democratic performance, directly linked to Trump losing white voters, underscores the importance of this demographic. Losing a substantial portion of what is considered his “bread and butter” support base is indeed a significant challenge, comparable to a major setback in a business venture. The fact that nearly half of white voters still “approve” of him, even amidst such perceived issues, remains a concerning figure for many and points to a deep-seated division within the electorate.
The description of Trump as a “corrupt, rapist, traitor” by some, and the assertion that “decent people don’t like that,” highlights the visceral reaction he elicits from a segment of the population. This sentiment fuels the argument for a fundamental change in how political discourse and propaganda are conducted in the country, as the continued approval by a significant portion of white voters is seen as deeply disturbing. The frustration is palpable, with some expressing a desire for immediate removal, linking it to grave concerns about child welfare.
The sheer scale of the alleged disapproval, with some suggesting ratings have dropped by “800%” or even “1,200%,” while extreme, reflects the intense negative sentiment. Despite these dramatic pronouncements and the alleged controversies surrounding his presidency, including accusations of racism, pedophilia, and corruption, the persistence of significant approval among white voters remains a stark reality. This leads to a pessimistic outlook for some, who believe that even with “three years left in office,” the damage to the country will be substantial and potentially irreversible, especially when contrasting it with the perceived stability of the Obama era.
The economic aspect, again, surfaces as a crucial motivator for Trump voters. The argument is made that if the cost of living, housing, groceries, and wages had improved significantly, his supporters would be actively celebrating his achievements. The lack of tangible economic benefit for the working class, coupled with other perceived negative aspects of his presidency, appears to be a key reason why some white voters are finally questioning their allegiance. It’s suggested that after years of turmoil, a portion of his base is beginning to see through the “full of sh*t” facade.
There’s also a perception that the shift in voter sentiment might be influenced by the identity of the opposing candidate. Some believe that white voters might be less inclined to support non-white or female candidates, suggesting that Trump’s continued appeal is partly a reaction to perceived threats to their demographic dominance. This adds another layer of complexity to the discussion of why Trump’s approval, even if declining, remains a significant factor.
Skepticism about the accuracy of approval ratings, particularly when reported by media outlets like Newsweek, is also evident. The feeling that these reports are repetitive clickbait, often highlighting minor fluctuations, leads some to dismiss them until concrete electoral results provide undeniable proof. The resilience of Trump’s core base, described as being historically “stuck” at a certain percentage, is a point of concern, implying that even significant disapproval might not translate into a decisive electoral defeat.
The need for fair elections and active participation is emphasized as the only way to truly gauge and influence voter sentiment. The current state of the US electoral system is even questioned, drawing comparisons to countries where external observation is necessary. The anticipation of midterm election results is seen as a more reliable indicator than the fluctuating approval numbers.
The assertion that it’s “too late” and that Trump still holds significant sway, even with half of white voters approving, paints a grim picture for some. The idea that “maga is for pedos” and linking it to “RightWingSexualPredators” demonstrates the extreme moral condemnation some feel towards Trump’s supporters and the movement itself. This suggests a profound moral chasm, where even allegations of severe misconduct, such as participating in or covering up a pedophile ring, fail to deter a significant portion of his white base.
The persistence of his support, even with accusations of abusing power, taking bribes, attacking allies, working with enemies, destroying the economy, and constant lying, is met with bewilderment. The inability to comprehend how half of the white population can still view these actions favorably underscores the deep ideological and perceptual differences at play. The dismissal of Newsweek as a source of reliable information, suggesting it merely recycles the same headlines, reflects a distrust in mainstream media narratives that don’t align with a particular viewpoint.
The consistent reporting of similar rating drops, with the implication that the numbers are always within a narrow range and are reported as soon as they dip slightly, highlights a perceived pattern of media manipulation or at least a lack of substantive change. The comparison of Trump’s base to that of historical figures like Hitler, implying a similarly unwavering and ideologically driven core support, is a stark and controversial assessment. The advice to focus on strategies beyond the “nonsense news cycle” to sway voters suggests a need for more fundamental engagement, as the current base seems resistant to external criticism.
The prediction that his voters will “come crawling back” and are merely “dormant” until an opportunity arises is a somber one, implying that the current disapproval is not a terminal condition for his political influence. The call for fair elections, as the only true mechanism for change, reiterates the importance of electoral processes. However, the current state of the US electoral system is viewed with apprehension, suggesting that its integrity is compromised.
The phrase “underwater with white voters is a good sign” suggests a perspective that even a slight decline in this historically strong demographic is a positive development. It’s framed as a step in the right direction, implying that a full reversal of his support is the ultimate goal. The notion that he is still polling positively with a significant percentage of Americans, even if his approval is “underwater” with white voters, illustrates the broader challenge of unseating him. Ultimately, the conversation revolves around the surprising resilience of his support, the complex factors influencing it, and the ongoing debate about its trajectory and implications for the future of American politics.