By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump has publicly criticized Olympic skier Hunter Hess, calling him “a real loser” after Hess expressed “mixed emotions” about representing the United States due to current events. Trump stated that if Hess doesn’t fully support the country, he should not have tried out for the team and that it is difficult to root for such an athlete. This criticism aligns with a broader backlash from Trump’s base against athletes speaking about political issues, with other conservative figures also voicing their disapproval and suggesting Hess should consider competing for another country. Similar sentiments have been directed towards figure skater Amber Glenn for her political stances.
Read the original article here
It seems we have a rather peculiar new matchup emerging, one that pits the enduring figure of Donald Trump, at 79 years old, against a rising U.S. Olympic athlete, a mere 27. This isn’t just a political clash; it’s shaping up to be “Team USA” versus “Team Trump,” with the former’s own athletes finding themselves in the crosshairs. The current situation, where a former president feels compelled to publicly criticize and target a young Olympian, is raising eyebrows and quite frankly, feels beyond the pale for many.
The core of this peculiar feud appears to stem from an Olympic athlete’s nuanced feelings about representing the United States. The athlete articulated a thoughtful perspective, suggesting that true representation aligns with personal moral values and the good aspects of the nation, rather than an unquestioning endorsement of everything the country does. This is a sentiment that many can probably relate to – the idea that loving one’s country and agreeing with its every policy are not mutually exclusive. Yet, this measured statement has apparently ignited a firestorm from Donald Trump.
The reaction from Trump, specifically, has been described as targeting the athlete, labeling them a “real loser.” This, coming from someone who once held the highest office in the land, strikes many as profoundly out of character and, frankly, unseemly. The irony is palpable when you consider the athlete has had to achieve a remarkable level of success to even qualify for the Olympics. To dismiss such an accomplishment as a “loss” seems to suggest a fundamental misunderstanding, or perhaps a deliberate misrepresentation, of what achievement truly means.
There’s a prevailing sentiment that this entire episode highlights a troubling pattern of behavior. The idea that a 79-year-old former world leader is dedicating his energy to feuding with a 27-year-old athlete, especially one performing on the global stage, is seen by many as a sign of an unhealthy obsession. It’s as if the former president has more Olympic feuds brewing than actual gold medals his nation might win. This, in itself, is viewed as the antithesis of “America First” energy – supposedly championing the nation, yet actively rooting against its own representatives when they express even the slightest deviation from a prescribed narrative.
This situation also brings into sharp focus the perceived hypocrisy within certain political movements. The athlete’s honest reflection on representation has been met with outrage from some, who then pivot to criticizing them for “mixing politics with sports.” Yet, these same individuals often seem to have no issue with politics when it’s aligned with their own viewpoints, such as when athletes are seen wearing MAGA hats or expressing overt support for Trump. This selective outrage over political speech in sports is a point of contention for many observers.
Furthermore, the athlete’s age and the natural progression of time are often brought up in contrast to Trump’s. The observation that a 27-year-old athlete will likely outlive an 80-year-old public figure is not just about longevity, but about the enduring nature of individual accomplishment and the passage of historical judgment. The hope expressed by some that athletes might even compete under a neutral Olympic flag, rather than the U.S. flag, speaks volumes about the current political climate and the desire to distance themselves from what they perceive as a problematic national identity under the current political landscape.
The notion that “Team Trump” has become a new opponent for Team USA isn’t entirely new for those who have followed his career. It’s been suggested this dynamic has been in play since 2015. The current instance, however, with a direct attack on an Olympic athlete, seems to be a particularly stark example. It raises questions about the very definition of patriotism and what it means to support one’s country and its people. The idea of loving one’s country while disagreeing with its government is a distinction that some feel is being lost in the current fervor.
The criticism leveled against Trump in this instance includes references to his past actions, such as avoiding military service, and accusations of self-enrichment through taxpayer funds. These are not new allegations, but they resurface with renewed vigor when he engages in what many perceive as petty squabbles with individuals who are simply trying to represent their nation on the world stage. The energy he expends on these feuds, particularly when he is no longer in office, is seen by many as exhausting and indicative of a persistent, almost spiteful, disposition.
The fact that this level of public animosity from a former president towards a young athlete is occurring is seen as a departure from what is considered normal presidential conduct. It’s a point of concern for many, prompting calls for people to recognize that even those who once supported him might eventually find themselves on the receiving end of his criticism. The athlete’s stance is viewed by supporters as a courageous act of defiance against what they see as a corrupt or flawed system, and their personal values are seen as a more authentic representation of the country than the current political leadership.
Ultimately, this saga highlights a deep division within the American electorate and raises fundamental questions about patriotism, political discourse, and the role of public figures. The emergence of “Team Trump” as a rival to “Team USA” in this context is a symbolic representation of these broader societal tensions, where personal and political allegiances are being tested and redefined on the international stage. The athlete, with their youth and perceived integrity, stands in stark contrast to the experienced, and often controversial, figure of the former president, creating a narrative that resonates with a significant portion of the public.