By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A newly released FBI document suggests Donald Trump called a police chief in 2006, stating that “everyone” knew of Jeffrey Epstein’s illicit behavior, potentially contradicting Trump’s past claims of ignorance regarding the financier’s crimes. The document, an interview with a former Palm Beach police chief, alleges Trump’s call occurred after the department began investigating Epstein. This revelation raises further questions about Trump’s knowledge of Epstein’s actions and could lead to increased scrutiny and a potential fracturing of his MAGA support base, many of whom have long demanded transparency on the Epstein case.
Read the original article here
The latest revelations from new Epstein files are suggesting a deeper connection between Donald Trump and the convicted pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein, with a particular focus on the idea that Trump was aware of Epstein’s illicit activities. It seems the public discourse is increasingly moving past mere insinuation and towards a more direct acknowledgment of this alleged knowledge.
The notion that Trump “knew” about Epstein’s behavior is being framed not as a groundbreaking discovery, but as a confirmation of long-held suspicions. Comments reflect a sentiment that this has been an open secret for years, with many pointing to Trump’s own past statements as evidence. For instance, his 2002 remarks to New York Magazine, where he described Epstein as someone who “likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,” are being revisited as a clear indication of his awareness of Epstein’s proclivities.
There’s a palpable frustration with what’s perceived as the media’s continued hesitation to state these alleged facts plainly. Many express exasperation with headlines that use cautious language like “suggests,” arguing that the evidence is so overwhelming that such delicate phrasing is no longer warranted. The desire for directness is evident, with calls for media outlets to be more forthright about what they believe to be the undeniable truth.
The context of Epstein’s continued membership at Mar-a-Lago, even months after his indictment, is also being brought up as a point of significant concern. This detail, for some, reinforces the idea of a close relationship and shared circles, making it difficult to believe Trump was unaware of Epstein’s alleged crimes.
The discussion often circles back to Trump’s own statements and actions. His past claims of not having had the “privilege” of visiting Epstein’s infamous island are being scrutinized, with questions raised about why he would have declined invitations if he had no knowledge of Epstein’s activities. The implication is that declining such an invitation suggests an awareness of what might occur there.
Furthermore, there’s a strong belief that Trump’s own alleged predatory behavior, as characterized by some commenters, makes his alleged knowledge of Epstein’s actions almost a certainty. The sentiment is that “it takes one to know one,” suggesting a shared understanding or experience that would lead to an awareness of such crimes.
The idea that Trump was “part of the pedo orgies” and that he and Epstein were “best party buddies for years” is a recurring theme. Some even propose a “Triumvirate” of Epstein, Maxwell, and Trump as the orchestrators of a “CR & Pedicide Ring,” asserting that all three are guilty of rape and murder, with one having evaded justice.
The new files, according to the prevailing sentiment, demolish the “didn’t know” defense. The sheer volume of mentions in emails and appearances in photos is presented as irrefutable evidence of Trump’s awareness and potential involvement.
The personal statements attributed to Trump within the context of these files are particularly damning. The allegation that Trump told cops, “Everyone knew about Epstein,” is seen as a critical piece of information, essentially admitting that awareness of Epstein’s conduct was widespread. This statement, if accurate, directly implicates Trump by acknowledging a general knowledge of Epstein’s activities.
Some of the most disturbing claims emerging from these new files, as presented in the discourse, are direct accusations of Trump’s participation in heinous acts against children. These include explicit allegations of rape, physical assault to ensure compliance, and even involvement in situations leading to the death of infants born from these assaults. The call for media to “call a spade a spade” is amplified by these grave accusations.
The perceived disconnect between the gravity of these allegations and the seemingly lenient treatment of individuals like Ghislaine Maxwell, who was allegedly moved to a minimum-security prison, is also a point of contention and fuels skepticism about the justice system.
There’s also a broader critique of the political landscape and the perceived complicity of certain groups. Some believe that particular segments of the population, influenced by their political or religious affiliations, are unwilling to accept any negative information about Trump, regardless of the evidence presented.
The historical context of Trump’s acquisition of beauty pageants, like Miss USA, is also brought into the conversation as a potential source of victims, further linking him to the exploitation of young women.
The idea that Trump was not just aware but was actively involved, perhaps even a “supplier” or “fellow child rapist,” is a strong current in these discussions. The phrase “knew? he was his freaking supplier!!” encapsulates this viewpoint.
Ultimately, the prevalent sentiment is that the new Epstein files, rather than introducing new information, serve to solidify and confirm what many already believed. The discussion is characterized by a sense of urgency and a demand for accountability, with many expressing a deep dissatisfaction with the perceived lack of justice and the ongoing debate surrounding Trump’s alleged knowledge and involvement.