By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The article argues that Donald Trump’s presidency has normalized previously unimaginable actions, citing examples of the First Lady’s enrichment, favorable tariff changes following gifts of luxury items, and business dealings that raise concerns of corruption. It highlights a governing style characterized by a lack of checks and balances, where fear of upsetting the President discourages dissent, and suggests the potential for authoritarian tactics, such as suppressing voter turnout, to be employed in future elections. The piece concludes by questioning the prospect of a return to traditional American leadership and democratic values.
Read the original article here
It’s hard to escape the feeling, looking at things from afar, that the United States has, in many ways, become a global spectacle, a subject of not just concern but also, unfortunately, laughter. This isn’t a new phenomenon for some observers, but it seems that Donald Trump’s ascent and tenure in the highest office have amplified this perception to a remarkable degree, turning what might have once been a source of admiration into a figure of ridicule.
The perception that the US is a laughing stock isn’t solely attributed to Trump, of course. Some argue that underlying issues have been present for decades. They point to a history of what they see as questionable domestic policies, like the persistent struggle with gun violence, where the proposed solutions often seem counterintuitive, or the complex and often criticized healthcare system, which leaves many burdened by medical debt while the ideal of universal care remains elusive. There’s also a critique of the economic model, where a market driven by powerful corporations and monopolies is sometimes framed as a “free market,” a notion that strikes some as a thinly veiled form of control, not unlike what they might associate with more authoritarian systems.
However, there’s a consensus that Trump, more than anyone else, has acted as a catalyst, bringing these perceived weaknesses to the forefront of global attention. His persona, often described as that of a clown with an “orange face,” his pronouncements, and his actions on the international stage have, for many, cemented an image of the US as something less than a serious global leader. The idea of him addressing Congress and the nation, described by some as a “whinefest with plenty of lies,” encapsulates a sentiment that his leadership is characterized by bluster rather than substance.
The election and re-election of Trump, in the eyes of many, have been particularly baffling. The argument is that after his first term, there should have been no doubt about his controversial nature and the ridicule that followed. The fact that he garnered significant support, even from educated professionals, suggests to some that there’s a deeper, perhaps unacknowledged, problem within the American electorate. This has led to a bleak outlook for some, who fear that the country may not learn from these experiences and could elect similar figures in the future.
Beyond the domestic arena, Trump’s impact on the US’s global standing is a major point of contention. Instead of strengthening the nation’s position, he’s seen as weakening it, simultaneously bolstering the ambitions of adversaries and making the US appear unreliable on the world stage. The strange handshakes and unconventional diplomatic interactions that characterized his presidency are often cited as moments when the global community collectively questioned the judgment of those who put him in power.
It’s not just about Trump as an individual, though. The sentiment is that he has become the embodiment of what many international observers already suspected about the US. Past events, like the Sandy Hook tragedy and its aftermath, or the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, or even the proliferation of what some consider mega-church scams, have contributed to a narrative of a nation with deep-seated problems. Trump, in this view, hasn’t created these issues but has rather exposed and amplified them.
The idea that Trump represents a segment of the American population is also a significant part of the discussion. He has, in this perspective, brought to the surface an “ugly side of America” that has always been present. For some international observers, particularly from neighboring Canada, the shift in perception is stark, with a preference for Canada over a country they now find themselves disliking. This isn’t just a matter of political disagreement; it’s a fundamental change in how the US is viewed and, sadly, feels to some.
The concern goes beyond mere amusement. Many believe that Trump’s actions have actively dragged the world toward instability, with the primary beneficiaries being the wealthy elite. There’s a conviction that his actions are deliberate, aimed at undermining the country’s economy, healthcare, and foreign relations, possibly stemming from personal grievances rather than national interest. This paints a picture of a leader who, far from being a champion of his nation, is actively working against it.
The argument that this trend predates Trump is also prevalent. Some argue that the US has been a “laughing stock” for decades, and Trump merely accelerated and intensified this perception. They describe America as a long-running comedy series that has shifted from a horror show to a comedy, with the latest administration’s perceived incompetence, like a “hospital boat” initiative, becoming a source of international amusement. The deep-seated issues of greed, corruption, and a system seemingly “for sale” are seen as contributing factors.
Ultimately, the notion that Trump has turned the US into a laughing stock is a complex one, interwoven with criticisms of American society, its political system, and its historical trajectory. While Trump is often identified as the primary driver of this perception, many believe he is a symptom of deeper, more pervasive problems. The laughter, for some, is tinged with a growing sense of fear and contempt as the consequences of these perceived failures become increasingly apparent on a global scale. It’s a narrative of a nation that, once admired for its ideals, is now seen by many as a cautionary tale, a subject of both pity and derision.