By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A recent national poll indicates a broad, albeit modest, decline in President Trump’s approval across key policy areas, including the economy and immigration. While voters express concerns about inflation and cite immigration as a top issue, a significant portion also questions current immigration enforcement tactics. This sentiment suggests a shifting public mood as the 2026 midterms approach, with erosion evident even in historically strong categories for the president.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump’s approval ratings appear to be in a downward spiral, with a recent poll indicating a decline across every major issue. This news, while perhaps not entirely surprising to many, suggests a widening disillusionment with his leadership and policies. It seems the public is increasingly scrutinizing the impact of his actions and statements, and the results are not painting a favorable picture.
Despite a confident assertion on his social media platform that he has achieved his “highest Poll Numbers I have ever received,” citing a strong country and the “best economy, EVER!” the actual polling data tells a different story. This discrepancy highlights a significant disconnect between his perceived successes and the public’s current sentiment, especially when considering the breadth of issues now showing a negative trend.
The notion that Americans are “NOT okay with the government gleefully murdering its own citizens” points to deeply held moral objections that are clearly impacting public opinion. When fundamental issues of human life and government responsibility are perceived as being mishandled, it understandably erodes trust and approval. This sentiment suggests a broader concern about the direction and ethical compass of the administration.
Furthermore, the idea that some are signaling their disapproval by stating they “want to raise the price of housing” is a sharp indicator of economic anxieties. For many, policies that seem to directly benefit the wealthy at the expense of ordinary citizens, especially during times of economic hardship, are seen as a betrayal of public trust. It’s interpreted as being “on the side of rich assholes exploiting us for us money,” which is a powerful indictment of economic policy.
The persistent reporting of falling approval ratings, even when they remain at levels many find concerningly high, begs the question of how much further they can decline. The observation that his approval “started at 100” and is constantly falling implies a narrative of continuous erosion, leaving many to wonder if it will eventually dip into negative territory. This ongoing commentary itself reflects a societal preoccupation with his standing.
A stark comparison between hypothetical future approval ratings for President Biden in January 2025 and Trump’s current standing reveals a concerning reality for some: Trump’s ratings, even as they fall, remain higher in every category. This is perceived as “horrendous” and a sign that the public may not fully grasp the implications of his leadership, leading to an exasperated plea, “God help this stupid country.”
The constant stream of headlines about his sinking approval, however, can also feel like an echo chamber, reinforcing existing frustrations without necessarily prompting concrete action. The sentiment is that “everyone’s pissed, do something besides a god damn survey,” suggesting a desire for tangible change beyond just polling data.
The potential for Trump to “sue now” over negative coverage, a tactic he has employed before, is mentioned as a predictable reaction. However, the sentiment is that such actions are ultimately futile if the core issues are not addressed. For many, his approval won’t be a headline concern until it drops to genuinely alarming levels, perhaps “below 25%.”
The comparison of his declining approval to his “sanity” going “downhill fast” is a harsh but telling commentary on his perceived state. It reflects a view that his grip on reality and his political effectiveness are both waning simultaneously. The anticipation of what “Exit Polls” might reveal suggests a waiting game for definitive electoral consequences.
Despite the falling numbers, the continued presence of his “base” is a persistent factor, with some questioning why his approval remains at levels like “38%” when so many negative headlines emerge. The cyclical nature of these reports, met with the resilience of his core supporters, leaves some feeling a sense of exasperation and a desire for a more significant shift, particularly when “he’s started to lose his racist bigoted base.”
The internal whispers from advisors, like Stephen Miller, suggesting he is doing “so good” and that “no one has done better than you in the polls,” stand in direct contrast to external polling data. This dynamic highlights the potential for misinformation or self-delusion within his inner circle, further complicating the perception of his actual standing.
The idea that his poll numbers might have only gone up in a niche, offensive category like “pants-shitters” is a crude but illustrative example of the extreme opinions held, both for and against him. This highlights the deeply polarized nature of public opinion.
The accusation that Trump is a “pedophile rapist” is a severe and deeply disturbing claim, underscoring the intense animosity and the gravity of the accusations leveled against him. The sentiment that “Literally anything trump has done would be enough to see a politician lose their career and be brought to justice” reflects a profound sense of outrage that such allegations, and others, have not led to more severe consequences. The assertion that “The president of the United States is a central figure to a child sex trafficking ring and nothing is being done about it” is a chilling indictment and a stark reminder of the serious accusations that continue to swirl around him.
The persistent question of “How did we even get here?” speaks to a broader bewilderment about the political landscape and the public’s acceptance of certain figures and behaviors. The fact that his approval remains “still at 45%” after all this is met with disbelief and frustration, with many attributing his continued support to a lack of critical thinking among voters.
The analysis that he is “failing on every major issue” and that his speeches consist of “100% rhetoric and lies, 0% truth or substance” paints a picture of a leader who is not delivering on promises. The specific mention of plans to “lower prices” without a concrete strategy, and the dismissal of tariffs’ effectiveness, illustrate a perceived lack of genuine policy expertise.
The speculation about him being a “puppet for Putin” and falling into a “honey trap” during his visit to Russia points to broader geopolitical concerns and a distrust of his foreign policy decisions. The observation that he responds only to praise or trophies highlights a perception of his ego-driven nature.
The notion that his approval could “fall into a grave” is a hyperbolic expression of hope for his political demise. The difficulty in believing he has a “nonzero rating” at this point, and the horror at the “cognitive abilities” of fellow citizens who still support him, reveal a deep level of disillusionment.
The refrain of “Unite Impeach Imprison” encapsulates a strong desire for accountability and removal from office. The repeated calls for citizens to “Wake the Fuck Up and take Charge of the U.S.” reflect a frustration with perceived inaction and a yearning for a more engaged and informed electorate.
The observation that Trump’s approval is sinking “not just with critics, but even with independents and groups he leaned on in 2024” is seen as a significant development, suggesting a broadening base of dissatisfaction. However, this is tempered by a call to move beyond what some perceive as “hopium headlines” and focus on more substantive analyses, particularly as the GOP faces the prospect of losing elections and may be tempted to “cheat.”
The idea that “Despots need good poll numbers?” ties his current situation to broader concerns about authoritarianism. The specific issues cited as reasons for public disapproval—mistreating citizens, alienating allies, the “Epstein Files disaster,” bombing countries contrary to promises, and raising housing prices—all contribute to a picture of a deeply flawed presidency.
The frustration that “Anything trump has done would be enough to see a politician lose their career and be brought to justice” is a recurring theme, highlighting a sense of injustice and a perception that he operates outside the normal rules of political accountability. The question, “Is anything real anymore?” reflects a profound disorientation with the current political climate.
The hope that his “diminishing mental capacity” will coincide with his becoming a “lame duck president” offers a glimmer of optimism, though it is tempered by a recognition that substantial change requires “new young candidates to stand up against the current corrupt old school Democratic Party veterans.”
The repeated reading of headlines about his approval “continuing to fall” leads to the conclusion that he “should be in the negatives” by now. The fact that one poll showed his approval “ticked up from 47% to 51% in January” raises questions about the methodology and the specific demographics being surveyed.
The sentiment that his approval rating is “still way too high” and that “People are stupid” reflects a deep cynicism about the electorate. The visceral reaction that he is a “Disgusting bastard should be dragged out of the White House in shackles” underscores the extreme level of opposition he faces from some segments of the population.
The disbelief that people “don’t like a geriatric pedophile that craps it’s pants on television?” captures a sense of incredulity at his continued support. Concerns about the sample size of polls, with 2,000 voters being deemed “too small of a sample size to claim any approval rating as definite,” highlight a skepticism about the accuracy and representativeness of the data presented.
Finally, the observation that “Even Republicans are sick of him. Even MAGA has started to turn on him” suggests a potential fracturing of his support base, which, if true, could have significant implications for his political future. This represents a potential turning point, where even his staunchest supporters may be beginning to reconsider their allegiance.